Skip to main content
Tenders

Internal External Decoration

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
017217-2026
Value
£127,000
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Budget
£127,000
Duration
11 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Per Internal External Decoration Documents attached

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Internal External Decoration is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a CPV code and specifying an open competition procedure below the threshold. The absence of disputes and a clear procedure contributes positively. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern in some jurisdictions.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the CPV code is specific. The attached documents are expected to contain the detailed requirements. The main clarity issue stems from the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the tender notice itself.

Missing evaluation criteria specified in the notice.
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are present. The contract duration and start date are also specified. However, the lack of explicit details on exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, relying solely on attached documents, reduces completeness.

No specific requirements listed for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, or submission.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the deadline, while potentially short, is provided. The lack of specific tailored requirements for companies is a positive. The primary concern is the absence of explicitly stated objective evaluation criteria.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Practicality65/100

The tender provides a submission deadline and contract start date. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission, document URLs (beyond the general mention of attachments), and financing details limits its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified.
No specific document URLs provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for the deadline and contract start are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these aspects.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization.
Value and deadline disclosed.
CPV code provided.
Open competition procedure.

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Lack of detailed submission requirements.
No mention of sustainability or innovation.
Potential for a short submission deadline.

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria within the tender notice.
2. Provide more detailed submission requirements.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation elements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline