Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login12 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
6 documents available with AI summaries
The tender document outlines requirements for joint bids, cost submission, equivalency, and bid submission conditions that bidders must meet.
The bid cost table is a required form to enter the design and construction costs for the installation of additional lighting for pedestrian crossings.
The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.
The procurement passport is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not a document intended for completion.
The contracting authority seeks design and construction services for installing additional lighting at pedestrian crossings in Narva city, requiring a detailed work schedule.
The draft contract outlines the terms and legal framework for the design and construction of additional lighting for pedestrian crossings.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for pedestrian crossing lighting design and construction in Narva is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical submission details could be clearer.
The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and reasonable deadlines. The mention of a 'reverse procedure' for qualification checks is a standard practice. No immediate legal disputes or compliance issues are flagged.
The description of the project is clear, specifying the locations and the dual nature of the services (design and construction). The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 'bid cost' with relative weighting, implying the lowest price gets the highest score. Requirements are documented in various attached files.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, deadlines, and duration. However, the specific start date of the contract is not explicitly mentioned, and while financing is implied by the estimated value, explicit details are absent. The number of attached documents is stated, but their specific content beyond summaries is not fully detailed.
The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the evaluation criterion (lowest bid cost) is objective. Access to documents is provided. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a fair competition.
E-submission and e-procurement are specified. A URL for documents is not directly provided in the summary, but the existence of 7 documents suggests they are accessible. The contract duration is implied by the tender validity (4 months), but a specific contract start date is missing. Financing information is limited to the estimated value.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical and consistent.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which often comes with sustainability requirements.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required