Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction works for the 2nd stage of Kohila village family park

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307467
Value
€137,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 23, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€137,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement of construction works for the 2nd stage of Kohila village family park, including the creation of a net pyramid area, interactive play equipment, and an outdoor gym.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must adhere to the conditions and requirements for participation in the tender procedure as described in the tender basis document (Hanke alusdokument.docx).
--The tender requires the submission of a bidder's own confirmation (Hankepass) as initial evidence, in the format specified by the contracting authority.
--Specific requirements regarding joint bids, trade secrets, submission conditions, cost, and equivalence are detailed in the document "vastavustingimused.pdf".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority may exclude economic operators who have been convicted of offenses such as fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, as stated in the conditions for checking subcontractors.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm compliance with conditions and provide their data using Form 2 Osalemise taotlus_293619.docx.
--Joint bids require a Power of Attorney (Vorm 1_ Ühise pakkumuse volikiri.docx) authorizing one party to represent all.
--The tender is not divided into parts, requiring a comprehensive solution for quality and coordinated results.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The subject of the contract is the construction works for the 2nd stage of Kohila alevi family park, including the installation of a net pyramid area and an interactive play structure, as per the technical specification (Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit an initial cost statement (Vorm 3 Maksumuse esildis.xlsx) detailing construction costs for different stages, both excluding and including VAT.
--The contracting authority primarily evaluates bids based on the total cost of the bid, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307467_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will vet subcontractors for criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307467_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.6 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint bids, trade secrets, bid submission conditions, cost, and equivalency, necessary for participating in the Kohila village park 2nd phase construction tender.

Vorm 2. Osalemise taotlusDOC
Vorm 2 Osalemise taotlus_293619.docx -- 12.0 KB

This form is an application to participate in the tender, where the bidder confirms compliance with conditions and provides their details.

Vorm 3. Maksumuse esildisXLS
Vorm 3 Maksumuse esildis.xlsx -- 17.5 KB

The contracting authority requires the bidder to submit an initial cost estimate detailing the cost of construction works for different stages, both excluding and including VAT.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307467_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the total bid cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307467_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.8 KB

The tender passport (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Hanke alusdokumentDOC
Hanke alusdokument.docx -- 17.1 KB

This document outlines the tender procedures and requirements for the construction works of the 2nd phase of Kohila village family park, which bidders must comply with.

Lisa 1. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 2.9 MB

This document is the draft contract for the Kohila village family park's 2nd stage construction works, outlining contract terms, contractor obligations, and penalty clauses.

Lisa 2. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 1.7 MB

The subject of the tender is the construction works for the 2nd stage of Kohila village family park, including the installation of a net pyramid area and an interactive play device according to the provided technical specification.

Vorm 1. VolikiriDOC
Vorm 1_ Ühise pakkumuse volikiri.docx -- 12.4 KB

This power of attorney is required for joint bids to authorize one party to represent all parties in the tender procedure and contract signing.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the Kohila family park construction is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks specific provisions for sustainability and could improve in terms of e-submission practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are reasonable within the context of the tender's scope. The 'Type: E' and 'Procedure: A' codes suggest a standard open procedure.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. Key documents like the technical specification and contract draft are referenced, contributing to clarity. Evaluation criteria are specified.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents such as the technical specification, contract draft, and submission forms are available. However, the 'Required: No' status for some important documents like the technical specification and contract draft is a minor concern for completeness.

Some crucial documents (Technical Specification, Contract Draft) are marked as 'Required: No'.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access and disclosure of value. The evaluation criteria, primarily based on the lowest price, are objective. The use of e-procurement and standard forms enhances accessibility. No specific company tailoring was detected.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement, which is positive. However, the reliance on specific document formats (e.g., .docx, .xlsx) and the lack of a direct URL for all required documents might slightly reduce practicality for some bidders. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Reliance on specific document formats might pose minor usability challenges.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are consistently populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status '11' is consistent with an active tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit requirements or criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, which limits the sustainability score.

No specific green procurement criteria.
No explicit social or innovation aspects mentioned.

Strengths

Clear and well-defined scope of work.
Comprehensive set of supporting documents provided.
Objective evaluation criteria focused on price.
Use of e-procurement platform.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Some key documents marked as not required.
Contract start date not specified.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria into the evaluation process.
2. Clearly state the contract start date.
3. Ensure all essential documents are marked as required for submission.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline