Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of Põltsamaa heating pipelines with pre-insulated materials

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307454
Value
€27,354
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Experience in supplying pre-insulated pipelinesExperience
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€27,354
Duration
5 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€99,138
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
262 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Pre-insulated materials for the reconstruction of Põltsamaa heating pipelines.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must submit a bid for the necessary materials for the reconstruction of Põltsamaa heating pipelines.
--The bid must comply with the submitted delivery terms, payment terms, and quality requirements.
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender conditions, including issues of business secrets and power of attorney for joint bidders.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm they have no mandatory exclusion grounds, including criminal convictions, tax arrears, and serious professional misconduct.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender conditions.
--Bidders must submit a power of attorney for joint bidders.
--Bidders must provide explanations and evidence for equivalency claims.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must provide evidence of materials' compliance with standards.
--Bidders must provide installation instructions.
--Bidders must provide technical specifications.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.
--Bidders must submit Form 3 detailing the cost of the bid for different stages of the reconstruction project.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307454_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.3 KB

Bidders must submit proof of material compliance with standards, installation instructions and technical specifications, and confirm acceptance of tender conditions, including questions on business secrets and joint bidder power of attorney.

Vorm 1 - Tehtud töödDOC
Vorm 1 - tehtud tööd .docx -- 27.2 KB

The bidder must submit a form demonstrating their experience in supplying pre-insulated pipelines from 2023-2025, including contract details and cost.

Vorm 3 - Pakkumuse maksumusXLS
Vorm 3 - Pakkumuse maksumus (Põltsamaa).xlsx -- 39.4 KB

Bidders must submit Form 3, detailing the bid price for the reconstruction of Põltsamaa heating pipelines across different stages.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307454_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307454_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 9.7 KB

Bidders must confirm they do not fall under mandatory or optional exclusion grounds, covering criminal convictions, tax debts, and severe professional misconduct.

Hanke korraldusDOC
Hanke korraldus_Põltsamaa_materjal.docx -- 27.3 KB

This document outlines the tender procedure stages, qualification criteria verification, and potential negotiations for evaluating bids for the reconstruction of Põltsamaa heating pipelines.

Tellija tingimused PõltsamaaDOC
Tellija tingimused Põltsamaa.docx -- 28.8 KB

Bidders must submit proposals for materials for the reconstruction of Põltsamaa district heating pipelines, adhering to specified delivery terms, payment conditions, and quality requirements, including proof of equivalency.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of heating pipelines in Põltsamaa is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process focused on price. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles, including proper CPV coding and a clear procedure. The mention that it's not a public procurement under the Public Procurement Act and that disputes cannot be filed with the Public Procurement Review Committee is noted. The financing is EU funded, implying adherence to relevant regulations. Deadlines are reasonable.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender is clear, and the requirements are documented across various forms and documents. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with the lowest price receiving maximum score. Conditions are clearly stated to be in the contract project and other tender documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, the financing condition is stated to be in the contract project and other documents, which could be more directly presented. The .zip file format for the contract project is not analyzed, potentially hiding crucial details.

Financing conditions are referenced in other documents rather than being directly stated.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value and using objective criteria (lowest price). The requirement for 'or equivalent' for various specifications promotes competition. E-procurement is utilized, and access to documents is provided. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are indicated, which is positive. However, the .zip file format for a key document (Contract Project) hinders direct analysis and potentially complicates the submission process for bidders if not handled properly. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, only the duration.

Contract start date is not explicitly stated.
A key document is in a .zip format, which may not be ideal for direct AI analysis or easy bidder access.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which implies some level of adherence to EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as evaluation criteria or requirements.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear description and documented requirements.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of 'or equivalent' to promote competition.
EU funded, indicating adherence to certain standards.
E-submission and e-procurement.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Key contract document in .zip format.
Financing conditions referenced in other documents.

Recommendations

1. Explicitly state sustainability goals or criteria if applicable.
2. Ensure all critical tender documents are in easily accessible formats.
3. Consider adding a clear contract start date or a mechanism for its determination.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline