Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login21 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
11 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must submit a tender that complies with the contracting authority's conditions, including submitting documents according to Form 2 and Form 3, and ensuring the project manager possesses the required professional qualifications for construction management.
The bidder must submit Form 1 to confirm their net turnover for the last three financial years and provide a list of reference contracts demonstrating fulfillment of qualification criteria.
Form 2 is a tender participation application where the bidder confirms agreement with tender conditions and compliance of their bid.
Bidders must submit a detailed cost table outlining the expenses for all renovation works, including nameplate installation, cleaning, painting, bench finishing, tree planting, and other related tasks.
The contracting authority requires the submission of the project manager's CV, confirming their availability for contract execution.
This document is a joint bid authorization letter, empowering one bidder to represent other joint bidders in the public procurement.
The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on the total cost of works, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
Bidders must confirm they have no exclusion grounds under RHS § 95 para 1, have a net turnover of at least EUR 100,000 for the last three financial years, and have completed at least two similar construction or renovation works in the last 60 months.
This document provides instructions for bid submission, formatting, and deadlines, along with references to the technical specification and contract terms.
This document contains the draft construction works contract, including general and special conditions, which is necessary for tender submission.
The technical specification details the scope, materials, and installation requirements for the renovation works at the Maarjamäe Memorial to Victims of Communism, including the design and installation of an additional nameplate.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for renovation works at the Maarjamäe Memorial is generally well-structured with clear requirements and good data consistency. However, it lacks specific provisions for sustainability and innovation.
The tender adheres to standard public procurement procedures, specifying clear exclusion grounds and eligibility criteria. The CPV code is provided, and the procedure is identified. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are reported, contributing to a good score. However, the absence of explicit green procurement or social considerations slightly lowers the score.
Requirements are clearly documented through various forms and attached documents, including technical specifications and contract drafts. The scope of work is well-defined, and evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting based on total cost, indicating a clear approach. The tender is largely easy to understand.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and submission deadlines. Key documents like technical specifications and contract templates are attached. However, the contract start date is explicitly stated as indicative, and financing information is not detailed, leading to a moderate completeness score.
The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and criteria are objectively stated (lowest price). The estimated value is disclosed. While there are no explicit requirements tailored to specific companies, the financial turnover requirement and the number of similar works, while standard, could potentially be restrictive for very small, specialized companies. Overall fairness is good.
E-submission is mandated, which is a positive for practicality. However, the contract start date is stated as indicative, which can create uncertainty. Financing details are not provided, and while the contract duration is specified, the lack of specific financing information can impact the practical execution planning for bidders.
Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are well-populated and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logical and sequential, contributing to a high score for data consistency.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While it is stated as an EU funded project (implied by typical tender structures but not explicitly confirmed), the lack of dedicated sustainability criteria results in a moderate score. The renovation work itself might have inherent sustainability benefits depending on the materials used, but these are not highlighted.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required