Skip to main content
Tenders

Pothole repair of public roads in Narva-Jõesuu city 2026

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307362
Value
€88,710
Location
Estonia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 18, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€88,710
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of this procurement is to carry out pothole repairs on paved and asphalt surfaces in the city of Narva-Jõesuu (including Sinimäe, Olgina, Viivikonna, Sirgala, Soldina, Pimestiku, Udria, Perjatsi, Laagna, Puhkova, Tõrvajõe, Kudruküla, Hiiemetsa, Hundinurga, Auvere, Arumäe villages).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (19)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS19
--Submit powers of attorney.
--Confirm acceptance of conditions.
--Submit costs according to forms.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but general procurement law applies.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must provide a Hankepass (tenderer's own confirmation) as initial proof instead of certificates from authorities or third parties.
--Must have relevant MTR registration.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated beyond the scope of the technical description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly stated beyond the bid amount.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307362_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.1 KB

Bidders must submit power of attorney, confirm acceptance of terms, and provide cost proposals according to forms, along with relevant MTR registration.

Lisa 3 Maksumuse esildisDOC
Lisa 3 Maksumuse esildis.docx -- 17.3 KB

The bidder must submit their cost proposal for asphalt concrete and paved surface patching works, considering a potential 15% change in the scope of work.

Lisa 4 Pakkumuse esitamise vormDOC
Lisa 4 Pakkumuse esitamise vorm 2026.docx -- 17.1 KB

This document is a bid submission form where the bidder confirms agreement with tender conditions and provides their details.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307362_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender evaluates the total cost of bids, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307362_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 40.0 KB

The procurement passport (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats.

Hanke alusdokumendidDOC
Hanke alusdokumendid.docx -- 37.0 KB

The tender documents for Narva-Jõesuu city's public road pothole repair include general information about the procurement procedure, contracting authority, and the subject of the contract.

Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 1 Hankelepingu projekt 2026.docx -- 37.7 KB

This document is a draft of the public road pothole repair contract for Narva-Jõesuu, outlining general terms and contract annexes such as the handover-acceptance certificate.

Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 2 Tehniline kirjeldus 2026.docx -- 43.2 KB

This technical specification details the technical requirements for pothole repair on public roads in Narva-Jõesuu, including materials, work methods, and responsibilities.

Lisa 5 Pakkuja esindaja volikirja vormDOC
Lisa 5 Pakkuja esindaja volikirja vorm 2026.d... -- 13.7 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing an individual to represent the bidder's company name and sign the bid for the Narva-Jõesuu municipality's public road pothole repair tender.

Lisa 6 Ühispakkumuse volikirja vormDOC
Lisa 6 Ühispakkumuse volikirja vorm 2026.docx -- 16.7 KB

This document is a power of attorney confirming the formation of joint bidders and designating the leading bidder for actions related to the procurement procedure, contract conclusion, and execution.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for pothole repair in Narva-Jõesuu is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and could benefit from more detailed technical specifications.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement laws, with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The use of Hankepass as initial proof is a common practice in EU procurement, generally accepted.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements for submission are documented. Evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score. Conditions of compliance are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like the draft contract, technical specifications, and submission forms are attached or summarized. However, the absence of explicit detailed technical requirements beyond the scope description might leave some room for interpretation.

Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective (lowest price). E-procurement is utilized. The requirement for Hankepass instead of certificates from authorities is a standard simplification, promoting fairness. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL is implicitly available through the tender portal. The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, which is a minor drawback.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, which limits the scope for sustainability considerations within this specific tender's framework.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria
Absence of social or innovation considerations

Strengths

Clear description of works and location
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Reasonable submission deadline and contract start date

Concerns

Limited detail in technical specifications
No explicit sustainability or innovation requirements
Financing information not detailed

Recommendations

1. Consider adding more detailed technical specifications for materials and methods.
2. Incorporate specific green procurement or social clauses if applicable to future tenders.
3. Provide more explicit details on financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline