Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Acquisition of a crawler excavator with attachments

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307354
Value
€130,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 26, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of the offer20%
Warranty period20%
Compliance with technical specifications20%
Ease of use20%
Response speed20%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€130,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€173,923
Avg. Bids
2.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
160 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The company OÜ Saki Talu wishes to acquire a crawler excavator with a working weight of 9500-10500 kg, along with attachments. The procurement will proceed upon receiving a positive response from PRIA.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender presents a strong opportunity for bidders offering a technically compliant, cost-effective, and highly reliable crawler excavator. Maximizing scores in warranty, response speed, and ease of use, alongside a competitive price, will be crucial for success.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Reliability and Support: Delivering a technically superior excavator with an industry-leading warranty and rapid response to ensure minimal downtime for OÜ Saki Talu.

Value Beyond Price: Offering a comprehensive package that combines competitive pricing with exceptional long-term value through superior warranty and ease of use.

Key Opportunities
High weighting on warranty and response speed offers a significant opportunity to differentiate.
The subjective 'ease of use' criterion allows for demonstration of superior product design and operator comfort.
The absence of specific green or social procurement requirements simplifies focus on core technical and commercial aspects.
Key Challenges
Intense competition on price due to the 20% weighting.

Focus on demonstrating value beyond the initial purchase price through superior warranty, reliability, and ease of use to justify a slightly higher but more valuable offer.

Subjectivity in 'ease of use' evaluation requires a tangible demonstration or strong descriptive evidence.

Provide detailed specifications on ergonomic features, intuitive controls, and operator comfort. If possible, offer a demonstration or video showcasing ease of operation.

Meeting the strict warranty requirement (60 months/5000 hours without maintenance contract) may be challenging for some.

Ensure the offered equipment and manufacturer's warranty fully meet or exceed this requirement. Clearly state the terms and conditions of the warranty.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A reputable supplier of heavy machinery with a proven track record in providing excellent after-sales support, including rapid response to technical issues and comprehensive warranty coverage. The ideal bidder will have a strong understanding of the Estonian market and a commitment to customer satisfaction.
Key Requirements
New crawler excavator weighing between 9500-10500 kg meeting specific technical specifications (engine power, emission standards, hydraulics, auxiliary lines).
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation or sanctioned territories.
Offered goods must not be subject to sanctions.
Warranty period of at least 60 months or 5000 working hours (incl.), valid without a maintenance contract.
Demonstrated ease of use of the excavator.
Fast response time to malfunctions.
Key Discriminators
Offering a warranty significantly exceeding the minimum requirement (e.g., 72 months or 6000 hours).
Demonstrating a proactive and highly responsive after-sales service network with guaranteed rapid response times (e.g., within 2-4 hours for critical issues).
Providing detailed evidence and potentially a demonstration of superior operator ergonomics and intuitive controls that directly contribute to 'ease of use'.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local training for OÜ Saki Talu operators on the new excavator's features and maintenance, enhancing their operational efficiency and skills.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of the offer20.0%

Benchmark competitor pricing and aim for a highly competitive offer. If unable to be the absolute lowest, ensure the price is justified by superior features in other scoring areas.

Warranty period20.0%

Offer a warranty that comfortably exceeds the 60 months/5000 hours minimum, ideally 72 months/6000 hours or more. Clearly articulate the terms and conditions.

Compliance with technical specifications20.0%

Ensure 100% compliance with all technical specifications. Provide clear documentation and cross-references to the technical specification to demonstrate full adherence.

Ease of use20.0%

Highlight ergonomic design, intuitive controls, operator comfort features, and ease of maintenance. Support claims with manufacturer data or testimonials if available. Consider offering a demonstration.

Response speed20.0%

Clearly define the response time to malfunctions (e.g., within X hours of notification) and detail the service infrastructure and technician availability to support this claim. Offer a faster response time than competitors if feasible.

Recommendations7
Exceed Minimum Warranty Requirements
CriticalMed effort

Offer a warranty period of at least 72 months or 6000 working hours, significantly exceeding the 60 months/5000 hours minimum. This will secure maximum points and act as a strong differentiator.

Secures maximum points for warranty criterion, enhances perceived value and reliability.
Demonstrate Superior Ease of Use
CriticalMed effort

Provide detailed documentation on ergonomic features, intuitive controls, operator comfort, and ease of maintenance. If possible, arrange a demonstration or provide video evidence to support claims of convenience.

Maximizes score in a subjective but high-weighting criterion, directly addressing the contracting authority's evaluation method.
Commit to Rapid Response Times
CriticalMed effort

Clearly state a response time to malfunctions that is faster than typical industry standards (e.g., within 2-4 hours for critical issues). Detail the service network and technician availability to support this commitment.

Secures maximum points for response speed, demonstrating reliability and commitment to minimizing downtime.
Strictly Adhere to Sanctions Compliance
CriticalLow effort

Thoroughly vet all potential subcontractors and suppliers to ensure no connection to the Russian Federation or sanctioned territories. Provide explicit confirmation as required.

Avoids mandatory exclusion, ensuring bid viability.
Competitive Pricing Strategy
HighMed effort

While aiming for the lowest price, ensure it is sustainable and does not compromise quality or the ability to meet other stringent requirements. Justify any price premium with superior performance in other evaluation criteria.

Maximizes score for cost criterion, balances price with overall value.
Highlight Manufacturer's Reputation and Support
HighLow effort

Emphasize the manufacturer's global reputation for quality, durability, and excellent after-sales support. This reinforces the reliability and long-term value of the offered excavator.

Builds confidence in the offer, supports claims of reliability and ease of use.
Thorough Technical Specification Review
MediumMed effort

Conduct an exhaustive review of 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' to ensure absolute compliance. Any deviation, however minor, can lead to point deductions. Document compliance meticulously.

Ensures maximum points for technical compliance, avoids penalties.
Competitive Positioning
Position your offer as the most reliable and user-friendly solution, backed by an unparalleled warranty and service commitment, rather than solely focusing on being the cheapest. Emphasize the total cost of ownership and operational efficiency.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-14 06:00:00.
--Key evaluation criteria include the cost of the offer, warranty, compliance with technical specifications, ease of use, and response speed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must confirm that they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation or sanctioned territories for the performance of the contract.
--The offered goods must not be subject to sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--None specified.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for a new crawler excavator weighing between 9500-10500 kg.
--The excavator must meet specific technical requirements for engine power, emission standards, hydraulics, and auxiliary lines.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The estimated value of the tender is 130,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307354_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.8 KB

The bidder must confirm that subcontractors or suppliers involved in the contract performance are not linked to the Russian Federation or sanctioned areas, and that the offered goods are not subject to sanctions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307354_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 7.2 KB

The main evaluation criteria for the tracked excavator procurement include bid price, warranty, compliance with technical specifications, usability, and response time.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 21.4 KB

The tender seeks a new crawler excavator weighing 9500-10500 kg with specific technical requirements for engine power, emission standards, hydraulics, and auxiliary lines.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a crawler excavator is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit details on contract duration and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The requirement regarding sanctions against the Russian Federation is a specific but legally permissible exclusion ground.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required excavator is clear, and technical specifications are detailed in an attached document. Evaluation criteria are mentioned, although their weighting is not explicitly detailed beyond 'relative_weighting'. Conditions for submission are understandable.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value and a clear deadline. However, the contract duration is missing, which is a significant omission. The number of attached documents is specified.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. The criteria are objective, and e-procurement is mandated. The exclusion criteria related to sanctions are applied universally to all bidders and do not appear to unfairly target specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are specified. However, the contract start date is not provided, and financing information is absent. The lack of contract duration also impacts practicality.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is clear.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. The funding source is not specified, and it is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Objective evaluation criteria mentioned
Specific exclusion criteria related to sanctions

Concerns

Missing contract duration
Missing contract start date
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract duration.
2. Include details on the contract start date and financing.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation criteria.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline