Skip to main content
Tenders

Partial reconstruction of pier No. 13 at the Old Port

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307342
Value
€560,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 13, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price (excluding VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€560,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is the partial reconstruction of pier No. 13 at the Old Port, including the preparation of work drawings. The technical specification is provided in Annex 1 of RHAD.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The successful bidder must sign and return the contract to the contracting authority no later than 7 calendar days after receiving the prepared contract.
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-06 12:00:00.
--The final completion date for the work is no later than eight (8) months from the signing of the procurement contract, with an additional up to 1 month accounted for by the contractor for the fulfillment of obligations between the parties.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must prove they do not have grounds for exclusion as stipulated in RHS § 95.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must have at least one properly fulfilled contract for port quay construction works in the last 60 months.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with public procurement conditions.
--The goods must not be subject to sanctions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit data on completed contracts using Form 3, proving the existence of at least one properly fulfilled port quay construction, repair, or reconstruction contract in the last 60 months.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid price must be submitted according to the structure.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307342_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 39.2 KB

The contracting authority will vet subcontractors for criminal convictions related to corruption or terrorism before their involvement in contract execution.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307342_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.8 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with public procurement conditions, submit the bid price according to the structure, ensure goods are not subject to sanctions, and adhere to environmental requirements.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud lepingu andmed Lisa 3 vormil.DOC
Lisa 3 Täidetud lepingu andmed viitenr 307342... -- 46.1 KB

Bidders must submit completed contract data on Form Annex 3, proving the existence of at least one properly fulfilled port quay construction, repair, or reconstruction contract within the last 60 months.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307342_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307342_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 12.6 KB

Bidders must confirm the absence of exclusion grounds as per RHS § 95 and demonstrate at least one properly executed port quay construction contract within the last 60 months.

Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusolek kvalifitseerimise tingimustele tuginem...DOC
Lisa 5 Teise isiku (alltöövõtja) nõusoleku vo... -- 24.2 KB

This document is a subcontractor's consent form, confirming that the bidder may rely on the subcontractor's qualifications to meet eligibility criteria.

Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Lisa 6 Ühispakkujate_volikiri viitenr 307342.... -- 16.3 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing one bidder to submit a tender on behalf of other joint bidders.

RHAD Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekPDF
RHAD (lihthange) viitenr 307342.pdf -- 294.9 KB

This document outlines the proposal for submitting a bid for the partial reconstruction of Vanasadam quay no. 13, detailing the procurement procedure, deadlines, and participation conditions.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the partial reconstruction of Vanasadam quay no. 13 is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. Key areas for improvement include the explicit detailing of sustainability aspects beyond 'Green Procurement' and ensuring all necessary document formats are accessible for analysis.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure, a specified CPV code (though general), and a reasonable submission deadline. No disputes or suspensions are noted. The procedure is identified as 'LM' (Limited procedure) which implies a specific legal framework. The duration and validity periods are clearly stated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and essential requirements are documented. The evaluation criterion (lowest bid price) is explicitly stated. Conditions for submission and contract signing are detailed. The technical specification is referenced, though its full content isn't analyzed due to format.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, some key documents (Lisa 2 and Lisa 9) are in unsupported formats (.zip), and another (Lisa 11) in .xls, preventing full AI analysis. The financing condition refers to an attached project, which is appropriate.

Some key tender documents are in unsupported file formats (.zip, .xls), hindering complete analysis.
Fairness85/100

The tender is fair, with full document access (except for format issues mentioned) and the value is disclosed. The evaluation is based on a single, objective criterion (lowest bid price). E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, promoting accessibility. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are listed, enhancing practicality. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration from signing. Financing information is referenced in the contract project. The site visit date is provided, which aids practicality for bidders.

Contract start date is not explicitly defined, relying on contract signing.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive step. However, there are no specific social criteria or explicit focus on innovation detailed within the provided text. It is not indicated as EU funded.

Lack of explicit social criteria or detailed innovation requirements.
Not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Strengths

Clear identification of evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable deadlines and clear procedural information.
Explicit mention of 'Green Procurement'.

Concerns

Key documents are in unsupported file formats.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Limited detail on social and innovation aspects of sustainability.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are provided in universally accessible formats.
2. Explicitly state the contract start date or the mechanism for its determination.
3. Elaborate on specific social and innovation objectives within the sustainability framework.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline