Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation works at Raekoja plats 6 / Rüütli 2

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307309
Value
€600,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 12, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of the bid excluding the contracting authority's reserve and VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€600,000
Duration
6 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement contract is the reconstruction of rooms and technical systems in parts of the building located at Raekoja plats 6 / Rüütli 2 in Tartu.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-08 11:00:00.
--Additional information required for bid submission is available in "Lisateave.doc".
--The contract terms and conditions are defined in "Hankeleping.doc".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The contracting authority may exclude economic operators from the procedure if they are subject to criminal convictions for certain offenses (as per "alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused.pdf").
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable (as per "vastavustingimused.pdf").
--Bidders must adhere to restrictions on the involvement of subcontractors (as per "vastavustingimused.pdf").
--Bidders must comply with the conditions for submitting a bid (as per "vastavustingimused.pdf").
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The technical specifications for the repair works are detailed in "Tehniline kirjeldus.zip" (format not supported for AI analysis).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid will be evaluated solely based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score (as per "hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf").
--Bidders must complete the bid price table detailing construction costs (as per "Pakkumuse hinnatabel RP6.xlsx").

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307309_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will vet subcontractors for criminal convictions to ensure reliability during contract execution.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307309_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines compliance conditions regarding joint bidder authorization, trade secrets, subcontractor engagement restrictions, and bid submission requirements, making it a mandatory part of the tender submission.

Pakkumuse hinnatabelXLS
Pakkumuse hinnatabel RP6.xlsx -- 28.0 KB

The bid price table details the breakdown of construction costs that bidders must complete to submit their financial offer for the renovation works at Raekoja plats 6 / Rüütli 2.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307309_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

In the tender 'Raekoja plats 6 / Rüütli 2 renovation works', bids are evaluated solely on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307309_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 65.8 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the company, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not a document to be filled out.

HankelepingDOC
Hankeleping.doc -- 83.0 KB

The tender contract is the foundational document defining the terms and legal framework for the execution of works.

LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.doc -- 42.5 KB

This document provides additional information for the Raekoja plats 6 / Rüütli 2 renovation works tender, which is necessary for bid submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for renovation works in Tartu is generally well-structured with clear documentation, though some documents are not machine-readable. The evaluation is primarily cost-based, and sustainability aspects are limited.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. There is no indication of disputes. The process seems compliant with regulatory frameworks.

Clarity80/100

The tender's description is concise and clear. Requirements are documented in various attached files, and the evaluation criteria (solely on cost) are specified. Conditions for submission are also outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the inclusion of non-analyzable file formats (like .zip and .xml) for technical descriptions and ESPD raises concerns about full accessibility of all necessary information for some bidders.

Technical specification document (.zip) not machine-readable.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. While the criteria are objective (lowest price wins), the reference to specific exclusion grounds in a separate PDF requires bidders to ensure they have access to and understand all referenced documents. There are no explicitly tailored requirements favoring specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is facilitated, and a clear contract duration is stated. However, the lack of a direct URL to the contract start date and financing information might slightly reduce practicality for some bidders. The reliance on multiple external documents for requirements can also be cumbersome.

Contract start date not explicitly provided.
Financing information not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated consistently. The tender status indicates no ongoing disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and within reasonable procurement timelines.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded, leading to a lower score in this category.

No explicit green or social procurement criteria.
No focus on innovation.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details.
Well-defined CPV code and location.
Electronic submission and e-procurement platform used.
Objective and clearly stated evaluation criteria (lowest price).

Concerns

Technical specification document (.zip) is not machine-readable for AI analysis, potentially hindering full bidder understanding without manual extraction.
Limited sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Contract start date and financing details could be more explicit.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all critical technical documents are provided in machine-readable formats.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation criteria in future tenders.
3. Provide explicit details on contract start dates and financing sources.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline