Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of surfaces on gravel roads in Järvamaa in 2026

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307308
Value
€1,257,475
Location
Estonia
Published
March 13, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of gravel road surfacing construction in Järvamaa in 2026100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,257,475
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
79
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of surfaces on gravel roads in Järvamaa in accordance with the conditions set out in the public procurement documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for gravel road construction in Järvamaa is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on meticulous cost optimization, demonstrating robust technical capability through detailed adherence to specifications, and leveraging the Hankepass effectively to avoid exclusion. While social and innovative aspects are absent, demonstrating efficiency and reliability in execution will be key differentiators.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Value: Delivering the lowest cost for high-quality gravel road construction.

Technical Excellence: Proven expertise in gravel road surfacing, meeting all Transpordiamet specifications.

Reliable Execution: A track record of timely and efficient project delivery.

Key Opportunities
Significant opportunity to win based on price due to the 100% cost evaluation weighting.
Leveraging the Hankepass as a tool for efficient self-declaration and to proactively address potential exclusion grounds.
Demonstrating a deep understanding of the specific technical requirements for gravel road construction in Järvamaa.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost savings in materials, labor, and logistics, and explore efficient construction methods. Consider economies of scale if applicable. Ensure no essential elements are omitted that could lead to claims or rework, which would negate initial cost savings.

Potential for disqualification due to errors or omissions in the Hankepass or failure to meet exclusion grounds.

Dedicate significant time to accurately complete the Hankepass, cross-referencing all information with company records. Conduct internal due diligence on all subcontractors regarding exclusion grounds. Seek legal counsel if any ambiguity exists regarding exclusion criteria.

The unavailability of AI analysis for critical technical specification documents (ZIP files) requires manual, in-depth review.

Allocate sufficient human resources with relevant technical expertise to meticulously review and understand all three technical specification documents (HD III-1, HD III-2, HD III-3). Ensure that the cost breakdown directly reflects the requirements within these documents.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in road surfacing, particularly gravel roads, possessing strong cost management capabilities and a thorough understanding of Transpordiamet's technical specifications. The company should have a clean record regarding exclusion grounds and be proficient in navigating e-procurement platforms.
Key Requirements
Compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, including accurate Hankepass completion.
Detailed adherence to technical specifications outlined in HD III-1, HD III-2, and HD III-3.
Submission of a completed cost list in Excel format, reflecting the lowest possible competitive price.
Confirmation of agreement with tender notice conditions.
Subcontractor background checks for fraud, money laundering, or financing terrorism.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated cost efficiency through optimized material sourcing and construction methodologies.
A flawless track record in previous road construction projects for public authorities, highlighting reliability and quality.
Proactive and transparent communication throughout the bidding process and project execution.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or sourcing of local materials where feasible and cost-effective, framing it as an efficiency benefit. For example, 'Commitment to utilizing local aggregate suppliers within a 50km radius to reduce transport costs and support the local economy.'
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of gravel road surfacing construction in Järvamaa in 2026100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest 'TOTAL' cost breakdown (excluding reserve and VAT) by meticulously analyzing all cost components, optimizing material procurement, labor efficiency, and equipment utilization. Ensure the cost breakdown precisely aligns with the technical specifications to avoid future cost overruns or claims.

Recommendations7
Meticulous Hankepass Completion and Due Diligence
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure the Hankepass is completed with absolute accuracy, cross-referencing all data with official company records. Conduct thorough background checks on all proposed subcontractors to proactively mitigate any risks related to exclusion grounds (fraud, money laundering, financing terrorism).

Prevents immediate disqualification and ensures eligibility.
Aggressive Cost Optimization and Detailed Breakdown
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a highly competitive cost proposal by scrutinizing every cost element. This includes material sourcing, labor rates, equipment efficiency, and logistics. The Excel cost list must be detailed and directly reflect the requirements in the technical specifications to avoid any ambiguity or potential for claims.

Maximizes score in the 100% cost-weighted evaluation.
In-depth Technical Specification Analysis
CriticalHigh effort

Allocate experienced technical personnel to thoroughly analyze and understand the detailed technical specifications in HD III-1, HD III-2, and HD III-3. Ensure all proposed methods, materials, and quality control measures directly align with these requirements.

Ensures technical compliance and avoids potential issues during execution.
Confirm Agreement with Tender Conditions Early
HighLow effort

Explicitly confirm agreement with all tender notice conditions as required. This is a straightforward but mandatory step that should be addressed early in the bid preparation process.

Ensures compliance with submission requirements.
Subcontractor Vetting Process
HighMed effort

Establish a robust vetting process for all subcontractors to ensure they meet the required background checks regarding criminal proceedings for fraud, money laundering, or financing terrorism. Obtain necessary declarations and documentation from them.

Mitigates risk of disqualification due to subcontractor issues.
Highlight Proven Track Record in Similar Projects
MediumMed effort

While not a formal evaluation criterion, subtly reference past successful projects of similar scope and complexity, particularly those executed for public authorities like Transpordiamet, to build confidence in your company's capability and reliability.

Builds trust and perceived reliability, indirectly influencing the evaluation.
Consider Local Sourcing/Employment (if cost-effective)
LowLow effort

If feasible and without compromising cost-competitiveness, consider incorporating a commitment to local sourcing of materials or local employment. Frame this as an efficiency or community benefit that aligns with responsible business practices.

Adds a positive, albeit minor, dimension to the bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the technical quality required by Transpordiamet. Emphasize efficiency in operations and a lean cost structure. Highlight a strong understanding of the specific gravel road construction needs in Järvamaa, demonstrating specialized expertise.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender notice conditions.
--Submit a completed cost list in Excel format.
--Mark any business secrets if applicable.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Background documents mention exclusion grounds and qualification conditions are available in the e-procurement environment.
--Subcontractor background checks will be conducted regarding convictions in criminal proceedings for fraud, money laundering, or financing terrorism.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The Hankepass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof of qualifications and exclusion grounds, to be filled out electronically.
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender notice conditions.
--The tender documents mention qualification conditions are available in the e-procurement environment.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The project involves the construction of gravel road surfaces in Järvamaa in 2026.
--Detailed technical specifications are provided in the following documents: HD III-1 Tehniline kirjeldus 15151.zip, HD III-2 Tehniline kirjeldus 15167.zip, HD III-3 Tehniline kirjeldus 15168.zip.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 1257475.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost list in Excel format.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307308_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 29.9 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding convictions in criminal cases for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307308_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender notice conditions, submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel, and declare any business secrets if applicable.

HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV Kululoend.xlsx -- 18.9 KB

The contracting authority seeks bids for the construction of a dust-free surface on a gravel road in Järvamaa, presenting a detailed cost breakdown for various works and materials.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307308_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The contracting authority Transpordiamet will evaluate bids for gravel road surfacing construction in Järvamaa in 2026 primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307308_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.9 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof of qualification and exclusion grounds as required by the contracting authority, to be filled out electronically.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 34.6 KB

The tender's base document contains general information about the contracting authority, procurement procedure, reasons for not dividing into lots, and bidder exclusion grounds and qualification conditions, all available on the e-procurement platform.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

79
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is well-structured with clear requirements and a fair process, although it could benefit from stronger sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance80/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure and a relevant CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable given the complexity. No obvious disputes are flagged.

Clarity85/100

The description is concise and refers to detailed technical specifications within the tender documents. Criteria for evaluation are mentioned as 'relative_weighting', implying a structured approach within the full documentation.

Completeness75/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and key dates. However, the full extent of required documentation is heavily reliant on accessing the e-procurement environment, which might lead to issues for bidders not fully familiar with it. Some specific document types are zipped, hindering direct AI analysis.

Reliance on e-procurement environment for full document access.
Fairness90/100

The tender process emphasizes e-submission and e-procurement, promoting transparency. Objective criteria are mentioned, and the value is disclosed. There are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality70/100

The tender specifies e-submission and e-procurement. The contract duration is clearly stated. However, specific financing information is not detailed in the provided summary, and the reliance on external zipped documents for technical details could add a layer of complexity.

Lack of explicit financing information.
Dependence on zipped files for crucial technical specifications.
Data Consistency95/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no flags for suspension or disputes.

Sustainability40/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive step. However, no specific social aspects or innovation focuses are detailed in the summary, and it is not indicated as EU funded.

Lack of detailed information on social criteria and innovation.
Not explicitly EU funded.

Strengths

Clear procedural steps and e-procurement focus.
Disclosed financial value and reasonable deadlines.
Comprehensive technical documentation available (though zipped).
Fairness in evaluation criteria (relative weighting implied).

Concerns

Reliance on e-procurement environment for comprehensive document access.
Zipped document formats can hinder initial review and AI analysis.
Limited detail on specific sustainability (social, innovation) aspects.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are accessible in a universally readable format.
2. Provide more explicit details on social and innovation criteria if 'Green Procurement' is to be more than a checkbox.
3. Clarify financing sources and details if possible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline