Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Eastern ring road: Ihaste bridge – Lammi roundabout (incl.) and Ringtee street middle lane Jalaka–Võru viaduct

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307290
Value
€362,903
Location
Estonia
Published
March 11, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€362,903
Duration
3 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The technical specification of the public procurement is provided in the annex to the base documents. Overlay works will be carried out within the area shown on the link. https://gis.tartulv.ee/portal/apps/experiencebuilder/experience/?id=129c62a54c2e44d886c89bf9de4ab279
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender is heavily weighted towards price, making cost-efficiency paramount. Bidders must demonstrate robust technical capability to meet stringent specifications and ensure seamless integration of interdependent works. Proactive risk management and meticulous adherence to exclusion grounds are critical for success.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Quality and Seamless Integration at the Most Competitive Price.

Proven Expertise in Complex Road Infrastructure, Delivered with Absolute Compliance and Risk Mitigation.

Key Opportunities
Leverage economies of scale and efficient project management to offer the lowest possible bid price.
Highlight a strong, pre-vetted supply chain that explicitly excludes any Russian Federation associations, providing immediate assurance.
Emphasize a deep understanding of the interdependent nature of the works and a proven methodology for managing such complex projects to avoid integration issues and risks.
Key Challenges
The 100% price-based evaluation means intense price competition, potentially squeezing margins.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, optimize resource allocation, and explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality or compliance. Consider lean construction principles and efficient procurement strategies.

Ensuring absolute compliance with all technical specifications and control procedures, especially given the interdependent nature of the works.

Develop a detailed quality assurance and control plan that maps directly to 'Lisa 9' and 'Lisa 8'. Implement rigorous internal checks and balances throughout the project lifecycle. Assign experienced personnel to oversee technical compliance.

The strict exclusion grounds regarding Russian Federation associations require thorough due diligence of all potential subcontractors and suppliers.

Establish a clear and documented process for vetting all third parties. Obtain written declarations from all subcontractors and suppliers confirming their non-association with the Russian Federation. Maintain a clear audit trail of this due diligence.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced civil engineering contractor with a proven track record in road construction and infrastructure projects of similar scale and complexity. The ideal bidder will possess strong cost management capabilities, a highly efficient project delivery model, and a robust supply chain free from any associations with the Russian Federation.
Key Requirements
Adherence to detailed technical specifications in 'Lisa 9 - tehniline kirjeldus_Ringtee tn - Idaringtee tn.doc' and 'Idaringtee_alusdokument.docx'.
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
Lowest bid price for maximum score.
Understanding and compliance with the contract project ('Leping.doc') terms and legal framework.
Demonstrated capability to manage functionally interdependent works without separation.
Compliance with control and acceptance procedures outlined in 'Lisa 8_Enimlevinud kontroll_ja_vastuotu_.xlsx'.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated ability to achieve superior cost-efficiency through innovative construction methodologies or supply chain optimization, beyond standard practices.
A proactive and transparent approach to risk management, particularly concerning the integration of interdependent works, backed by a strong track record.
A fully compliant and pre-vetted supply chain that offers immediate reassurance regarding the exclusion grounds.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to local employment and training opportunities for residents of Tartu, framing it as a contribution to the local community's development, even if not directly evaluated.
Bid Focus Areas
Bid price100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price through meticulous cost engineering, efficient resource planning, and optimized procurement. Benchmark against industry standards and potential competitor cost structures.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for the Win
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% price weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the lowest possible bid. This requires a deep dive into cost optimization across all project elements, including labor, materials, equipment, and overheads. Explore opportunities for bulk purchasing, efficient logistics, and lean construction techniques.

Directly maximizes score in the sole evaluation criterion.
Fortify Exclusion Ground Compliance
CriticalMed effort

Implement a rigorous and documented process for vetting all potential subcontractors and suppliers to ensure absolute compliance with the exclusion grounds related to the Russian Federation. Obtain written confirmations and maintain an audit trail.

Prevents mandatory exclusion from the tender process.
Demonstrate Technical Integration Expertise
HighMed effort

Clearly articulate in the bid how the company will manage the functionally interdependent works without separation. Provide specific examples from past projects where similar integration challenges were successfully overcome, referencing the technical specifications and control procedures.

Addresses a key risk for the contracting authority and demonstrates capability.
Thoroughly Analyze Technical Specifications and Contract
HighMed effort

Conduct an in-depth review of 'Lisa 9 - tehniline kirjeldus', 'Idaringtee_alusdokument.docx', and 'Leping.doc'. Ensure a complete understanding of all technical requirements, quality standards, and contractual obligations. Map these directly to the proposed execution plan.

Ensures a compliant and technically sound bid, minimizing risk of rejection or future disputes.
Proactive Subcontractor Due Diligence
MediumMed effort

Beyond the exclusion grounds, conduct thorough due diligence on all proposed subcontractors regarding their financial stability, past performance, and capacity to meet the project's technical demands and control procedures ('Lisa 8').

Reduces the risk of subcontractor failure, which could impact project timelines and quality.
Highlight Efficiency Gains
LowLow effort

If possible, subtly highlight any innovative or efficient construction methods that contribute to cost savings and faster delivery, even if not explicitly requested as an innovative aspect. Frame this as added value for the contracting authority.

Can create a positive impression and subtly differentiate from competitors focused solely on basic compliance.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on the critical technical and compliance requirements. Emphasize a lean, efficient operational model that translates directly into savings for the contracting authority. Highlight a robust, pre-vetted supply chain that immediately satisfies exclusion criteria.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The 'hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf' is an initial confirmation of the entrepreneur's self-declaration, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected answers, but it is not a document to be filled out.
--The tender is not divided into parts because the construction works are not technically and economically feasible to separate, as it would be difficult to manage and cause significant additional costs to the contracting authority.
--The contracting authority will check the background of subcontractors regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or financing terrorism, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability ('307290_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused.pdf').
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not engage subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must confirm they do not engage subcontractors or suppliers associated with the Russian Federation.
--Joint bidders must provide power of attorney if applicable.
--Business secrets must be marked.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Detailed technical specifications for the construction works of the Idaringtee project are provided in 'Lisa 9 - tehniline kirjeldus_Ringtee tn - Idaringtee tn.doc'.
--The main contractor must perform the Idaringtee construction project according to the conditions and volumes presented, following applicable legislation and technical norms, as described in 'Idaringtee_alusdokument.docx'.
--The contract project ('Leping.doc') outlines the terms and legal framework for the construction works contract.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score in the evaluation criteria ('307290_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf').

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307290_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.8 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307290_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.8 KB

Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation, and provide a joint bidder authorization if applicable, along with specifying any trade secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307290_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307290_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.8 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

AlusdokumentDOC
Idaringtee_alusdokument.docx -- 32.2 KB

This tender document outlines the Idaringtee construction project, for which the main contractor must perform according to the provided conditions and volumes, adhering to applicable laws and technical standards.

LepinguprojektDOC
Leping.doc -- 196.0 KB

The contract draft outlines the terms and legal framework of the construction works contract, which is necessary for bid submission.

Lisa 8 – Kontroll- ja vastuvõtutoimingute loeteluXLS
Lisa 8_Enimlevinud kontroll_ja_vastuvotu_.xls... -- 68.5 KB

This document details the control and acceptance procedures between the client and the contractor, including requirements for testing and measurements.

Lisa 9 - Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 9 - tehniline kirjeldus_Ringtee tn - Ida... -- 351.5 KB

This document contains detailed technical specifications for the construction works of the Idaringtee project, which are necessary for tender submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road construction in Tartu is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical drawbacks regarding document accessibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, with detailed technical specifications provided in attached documents. Evaluation criteria are specified, and conditions for participation are outlined, contributing to good clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the reliance on external links for some technical details and the format of certain documents (e.g., ESPD XML) could be improved for full completeness.

Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access (with the caveat of external links), disclosed value, and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price). The e-procurement platform ensures a fair process. The exclusion of bidders associated with the Russian Federation is a specific but common geopolitical requirement, not company-tailored.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, which is practical. However, the reliance on external URLs for key technical documents and the contract start date not being explicitly stated (only duration) slightly reduce practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Reliance on external URLs for critical technical documents.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Geopolitical exclusion criteria clearly stated.

Concerns

Limited sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Reliance on external links for some essential documents.
Lack of explicit contract start date.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., use of recycled materials, waste management plans).
2. Consolidate all essential tender documents within the procurement portal for easier access.
3. Specify the intended contract start date or a clear mechanism for its determination.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline