Skip to main content
Tenders

Kopli 5 social building design and construction works

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307259
Value
€2,000,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€2,000,000
Duration
16 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Design and construction works of the social building located at Kopli tn 5 in Kuressaare, in the scope specified in the technical description (Document 2). Instructions for the tenderer are provided in the tender base document Document 1 - Instructions for the tenderer.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

25 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (8)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must complete the Hankepass (ESPD) as an initial self-declaration, following the format specified by the contracting authority.
--The tender involves the design and construction works for the Kopli 5 social building.
--Bidders must adhere to the instructions for bidders.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders may be excluded if they have been convicted of fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must confirm compliance with conditions.
--Bidders must confirm the use of legally sourced timber.
--Bidders must provide a cost breakdown.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--The contract covers design and construction of the Kopli 5 social building, including reconstruction and expansion of the existing building.
--The works are to be performed on a general contracting basis.
--The contract includes construction works and fixed furniture installation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated value of the tender is 2,000,000.0 EUR.
--Bidders must provide a cost breakdown (Form 2 - Kululoend).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307259_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307259_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.5 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to confirm joint offers, compliance with conditions, submission of cost breakdown, subcontractor engagement, and the use of legally sourced wood.

Vorm 2 - KululoendXLS
Vorm_2_Kululoend.xlsx -- 46.6 KB

Bidders must submit Form 2 - Cost Breakdown, detailing the cost estimation for the design and construction works of the Kopli 5 social building.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307259_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307259_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 74.5 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format for expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

Dokument 1 - Juhised pakkujalePDF
Dokument_1_Juhised_pakkujale.pdf -- 210.3 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders participating in the tender for the design and construction of the Kopli 5 social building, detailing tender specifics and requirements.

Dokument 2 - Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Dokument_2_Tehniline_kirjeldus.pdf -- 318.0 KB

The contracting authority is seeking a contractor for the design and construction of the Kopli 5 social building, involving the reconstruction and expansion of the existing facility according to the technical specification and annexes.

Dokument 3 - Hankelepingu projektPDF
Dokument_3_Hankelepingu_projekt.pdf -- 205.2 KB

This document is a draft construction works contract, outlining general and specific conditions, detailing contractor and client information, and construction project specifics.

Vorm 1 - Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
Vorm_1_Ühispakkujate_volikiri.docx -- 15.3 KB

This document is a joint bidder's power of attorney, authorizing one bidder to represent others in the procurement procedure and contract signing and execution, confirming joint and several liability.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and construction of a social building is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability criteria and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are reasonable within the context of the submission period. The procedure type 'E' (Open Procedure) and status '11' (Open for Bids) are standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and key documents like the technical specification and instructions for bidders are referenced. Requirements are documented, and evaluation criteria are specified, although the weighting is not detailed beyond 'relative_weighting'.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the specific weighting for the 'relative_weighting' evaluation criteria is missing, and the full content of some attached documents (e.g., .zip, .xml) could not be analyzed, potentially impacting completeness.

Specific weighting for evaluation criteria not detailed.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value and using e-procurement. The requirement for a single general contractor for technical and functional integrity is justified. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is positive. However, the mention of .xml and .zip file formats for key documents suggests potential compatibility issues for bidders if not handled through a standard e-procurement portal. The contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Potential compatibility issues with .xml and .zip document formats.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, but no specific criteria or targets related to environmental or social aspects are detailed in the provided information. It is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of specific green or social procurement criteria.
Funding source (EU) not explicitly stated.

Strengths

Clear description of works and justified single-contractor approach.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Disclosure of estimated value and reasonable deadlines.
Comprehensive set of required documents (e.g., technical specification, contract draft).

Concerns

Lack of specific sustainability criteria despite 'Green Procurement' mention.
Potential technical issues with .xml and .zip document formats for bidders.
Missing specific weighting for evaluation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Provide specific quantifiable targets or requirements for green procurement.
2. Clarify the expected format or platform for handling .xml and .zip documents to ensure ease of access and submission.
3. Detail the weighting of evaluation criteria for greater transparency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline