Skip to main content
Tenders

PAN3485 - Supply of Backhoe Loader (x3)

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023795-2026
Value
£352,800
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 07, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£352,800
Duration
12 months
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

To replace 3 backhoe loaders used by Bereavement Services (x1) and Highways (x2). The former has been VOR for over 12-months whilst a route to market was being considered. The vehicle has been classed as beyond economical repair and was over 17 years old. The latter two vehicles have now reached replacement age and are starting to become unreliable.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Deadline: 2026-04-14T00:00:00
--Duration: 12 months
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Replacement of 3 backhoe loaders.
--One for Bereavement Services.
--Two for Highways.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Value: 352800.0 EUR

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for backhoe loaders is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission methods, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified procedure, CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially tight, is within a reasonable range for an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the organization.

Clarity80/100

The description of the need for backhoe loaders is clear, specifying the number and intended departments. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of specific eligibility or technical capability requirements beyond the basic description reduce its completeness.

No document content available
No specific eligibility requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the criteria, though not explicitly detailed, are not tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a submission deadline and contract start date. However, it lacks information on e-submission, which is a common and practical method. The absence of financing information and the short contract duration (12 months) for equipment replacement might also be noted.

No e-submission specified
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these sustainability dimensions.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and basic description provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Open procedure promotes fairness

Concerns

Missing detailed evaluation criteria
No content available in tender documents
Lack of e-submission details
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Upload full tender documentation with clear content.
3. Specify e-submission process and any associated platforms.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline