Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of Rannajõe observation tower and partially boardwalk

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307245
Value
€16,200
Location
Estonia
Published
March 10, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€16,200
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

This procurement will order the reconstruction of the Rannajõe observation tower and a partially boardwalk. Location of works: Lääne County, Lääne-Nigula Municipality, Rannajõe village, cadastral unit - Rannajõe 45202:001:0081, 100% protected land (property no. 6311550).
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on the reconstruction of a specific observation tower and boardwalk in a protected natural area. The primary evaluation criterion is price, making cost-effectiveness paramount. Success hinges on demonstrating proven experience in similar environmentally sensitive projects and a highly competitive pricing strategy.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-effective, environmentally compliant reconstruction of Rannajõe observation tower and boardwalk.

Experienced and reliable partner for sensitive nature area construction projects.

Key Opportunities
Low estimated value suggests a focus on efficiency and streamlined operations for cost savings.
The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement', allowing for differentiation through sustainable practices.
The mandatory site visit is an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the site's specific challenges and opportunities, allowing for a more tailored and competitive bid.
Key Challenges
The primary evaluation criterion being lowest price can lead to intense price competition, potentially squeezing margins.

Focus on lean operations, efficient project planning, and accurate cost estimation. Highlight value beyond just price, such as quality and long-term durability, if possible within the price constraint.

The protected nature of the land (100% kaitsealune maa) requires strict adherence to environmental regulations, which can increase complexity and potential costs.

Thoroughly review 'Lepingu lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx' and 'Külastusobjekti kaitseväärtuste väljavõte' (if accessible) to understand specific constraints. Propose construction methods and materials that minimize environmental impact. Highlight any relevant certifications or past experience in similar environments.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized construction company with demonstrated experience in timber construction, boardwalks, and observation towers, particularly in environmentally protected areas. They should have a lean operational structure to offer competitive pricing and a strong understanding of Estonian environmental regulations.
Key Requirements
Proven experience in reconstruction of observation towers and boardwalks.
Compliance with environmental requirements and nature conservation.
Adherence to the technical specifications provided in the contract annexes.
Mandatory guided site visit.
Electronic bid submission.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated expertise in constructing within protected natural areas, showcasing an understanding of sensitive ecosystems and minimal impact methodologies.
A highly competitive and well-justified price, reflecting efficient project management and material sourcing.
Proactive engagement with the site visit to identify and propose minor, value-adding improvements that align with the project's goals and environmental sensitivity.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to using local suppliers for materials where feasible, supporting the local economy. Highlight any use of sustainably sourced or recycled materials in the construction process, aligning with the 'Green Procurement' aspect.
Bid Focus Areas
Total Cost

Submit the lowest possible price that is still profitable and allows for quality execution. Conduct a thorough cost breakdown to identify all potential cost-saving measures without compromising on quality or compliance. Benchmark against similar projects if possible.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Document Experience in Similar Projects
CriticalMed effort

Provide detailed case studies or references demonstrating successful reconstruction of observation towers and boardwalks, especially those in environmentally sensitive or protected areas. Quantify achievements where possible (e.g., project scale, duration, budget adherence).

Directly addresses a critical technical capability requirement and builds credibility.
Deep Dive into Environmental Compliance
CriticalHigh effort

Scrutinize 'Lepingu lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx' and any other environmental documents. Develop a clear plan outlining how environmental protection measures will be implemented during construction, including waste management, erosion control, and protection of flora/fauna. Highlight any relevant environmental certifications.

Mitigates risk of non-compliance and demonstrates a responsible approach, crucial for a protected area.
Aggressive, Yet Realistic, Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given the price-driven evaluation, develop a highly competitive price. This requires meticulous cost estimation, identifying efficiencies, and potentially accepting lower margins. Ensure the price is justifiable and does not indicate a lack of understanding of the project scope or quality.

Maximizes score for the primary evaluation criterion.
Mandatory Site Visit Preparation
CriticalMed effort

Attend the mandatory site visit with a team that can assess all technical and logistical aspects. Prepare a list of clarifying questions and use the visit to identify potential site-specific challenges or opportunities that can be addressed in the bid, demonstrating thoroughness.

Ensures a comprehensive understanding of the project, leading to a more accurate and competitive bid, and fulfills a mandatory requirement.
Highlight Sustainable Material Choices
HighMed effort

If feasible within budget and technical requirements, propose the use of sustainably sourced timber or other eco-friendly materials. This aligns with the 'Green Procurement' aspect and can be a subtle differentiator even if not explicitly weighted.

Enhances the bid's appeal by aligning with green procurement goals and demonstrating environmental consciousness.
Commitment to Local Employment/Sourcing
MediumLow effort

Include a statement about prioritizing local labor or sourcing materials from local suppliers where possible. This adds a social value element that can be beneficial, even if not a primary evaluation criterion.

Adds a positive social dimension to the bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective solution provider without compromising on the critical environmental compliance and technical quality required for a protected natural area. Emphasize efficiency and proven expertise in similar sensitive environments.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--Mandatory guided site visit is required (as per HD.docx).
--Declaration of business secrets is required (as per 307245_vastavustingimused.pdf).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but general exclusion grounds may apply based on Estonian Public Procurement Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legal entities.
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as per Estonian Public Procurement Act.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Proven experience in reconstruction of observation towers and boardwalks.
--Compliance with environmental requirements and nature conservation (as per Lepingu lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx).
--Adherence to the technical specifications provided in the contract annexes.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The estimated value of the contract is 16200.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307245_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 8.2 KB

The tender documents contain conditions that must be met when submitting a bid, including mandatory site visit and declaration of trade secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307245_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 6.8 KB

In the tender "Reconstruction of Rannajõe watchtower and partially boardwalk", bids are primarily evaluated based on the total cost, where the lowest price receives maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307245_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 39.6 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but it is filled out electronically, not directly.

HankedokumentDOC
HD.docx -- 58.4 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for the reconstruction of Rannajõe watchtower and partially the boardwalk, requiring mandatory prior guided site visit.

Lepingu lisa 1 - Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lepingu lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 31.7 KB

The tender seeks a construction company for the reconstruction of Rannajõe observation tower and partially boardwalk, with a strong emphasis on environmental requirements and nature conservation.

Lepingu projektDOC
Lepingu projekt.docx -- 37.7 KB

This document is a draft construction contract outlining the terms between the State Forest Management Centre and the contractor for the reconstruction of Rannajõe observation tower and partially boardwalk.

Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitusDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitus.doc -- 34.5 KB

The joint bidders' authorization and confirmation is a required document proving the right of joint bidder members to represent and act as a joint bidder in the tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of Rannajõe watchtower and boardwalk is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation based on price. However, it lacks explicit social or innovation criteria, and some document formats are not machine-readable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general public procurement principles. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope and value. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the issuing authority.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and technical specifications are referenced in annexes. Evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, primarily based on cost. Conditions for submission are documented.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, not all essential documents are in machine-readable formats, and some are marked as 'not required' which could lead to confusion.

Some essential documents are in non-machine-readable formats (.asice, .zip).
Fairness85/100

The tender provides full access to documents and discloses the estimated value. Criteria are objective (lowest price). E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. Deadlines are reasonable. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. A contract start date is provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value. The duration is specified as 'PERIOD'. The opening place is a URL.

Specific financing details beyond estimated value are not provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, but no specific criteria or targets are detailed within the provided information. Social aspects and innovation are not explicitly addressed.

Lack of specific green procurement criteria.
Absence of social and innovation aspects.

Strengths

Clear technical description and requirements.
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Reasonable deadlines and contract start date.
Disclosure of estimated value.

Concerns

Some critical documents are in non-machine-readable formats.
Lack of specific details on green procurement implementation.
Absence of social and innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all essential tender documents are provided in machine-readable formats.
2. Elaborate on the specific green procurement requirements and targets.
3. Consider incorporating social or innovation criteria if applicable to future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline