Skip to main content
Tenders

Design of the second stage of the Vaela kindergarten building in Kiili municipality at the main project stage

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307232
Value
€60,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€60,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of this procurement is the preparation of the project documentation required for the realization of the second stage (additional корпусы) of the kindergarten building located at Pärnaõie tee 2, Vaela village, Kiili municipality, Harju County, as the main contractor, at the main project stage, in accordance with the volumes, conditions, and requirements set forth or derived from the base documents of this public procurement and the preliminary project no. 4847 by Projekt O2 OÜ.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must follow the instructions for submitting bids (HD_Juhised_pakkujale_Vaela_II_proj_23032026.pdf).
--The Hankepass is a self-declaration of compliance with tender conditions and requirements, to be filled out electronically (307232_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf).
--Requirements for powers of attorney for joint offers, representative powers of attorney, marking of trade secrets, and submission of subcontractor data are detailed (307232_vastavustingimused.pdf).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must be registered legal entities.
--Bidders may submit as a joint offer, requiring a joint offer power of attorney (HD_Lisa_III_vorm_1_yhise_pakkumuse_volikiri.docx).
--Bidders must appoint a representative with a power of attorney (HD_Lisa_III_vorm_2_pakkuja_esindaja_volikiri.docx).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for the design of the II stage of Kiili valla Vaela kindergarten building at the main project stage.
--The technical description (HD_Lisa_I_Tehniline kirjeldus_Vaela_II_proj_23032026.pdf) defines the content, scope, and requirements of the design work, including design data and technical requirements for materials, systems, and equipment.
--The project design contract (HD_Lisa_II_Hankelepingu_projekt_Vaela_II_proj_23032026.pdf) specifies the contract documents and their order of interpretation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 60000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the cost of the design work, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score (307232_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307232_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.2 KB

This document outlines requirements for consortium powers of attorney, representative powers of attorney, business secret declarations, and subcontractor information submission, which are necessary for tender submission.

HD Lisa III vorm 1DOC
HD_Lisa_III_vorm_1_yhise_pakkumuse_volikiri.d... -- 20.2 KB

This document is a joint bid authorization, confirming that companies are submitting a joint bid collectively and appointing an authorized representative for the procurement process.

HD Lisa III vorm 2DOC
HD_Lisa_III_vorm_2_pakkuja_esindaja_volikiri.... -- 20.1 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing an individual to represent the bidder and sign the tender, valid until a specified date.

HD Lisa III vorm 3DOC
HD_Lisa_III_vorm_3_alltoovotjate_andmed.docx -- 20.5 KB

The tender document requires the submission of subcontractor data for those directly involved in contract execution, including their registration code, operating licenses, and contact information.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307232_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on the cost of design work, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307232_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.9 KB

The tender pass (ESPD) is a bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence of meeting the contracting authority's conditions and requirements, but it is filled out electronically, not directly.

HD Juhised pakkujalePDF
HD_Juhised_pakkujale_Vaela_II_proj_23032026.p... -- 249.7 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders on how to submit a tender for the design of the second phase of the Vaela kindergarten building in Kiili municipality.

HD Lisa II - Hankelepingu projektPDF
HD_Lisa_II_Hankelepingu_projekt_Vaela_II_proj... -- 286.1 KB

This document is a draft design contract that defines the contract documents and their order of interpretation.

HD Lisa I - Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
HD_Lisa_I_Tehniline kirjeldus_Vaela_II_proj_2... -- 306.8 KB

This technical specification defines the content, scope, and requirements for the design work of the second phase of the Vaela kindergarten in Kiili municipality, including design data and technical requirements for materials, systems, and equipment.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for kindergarten design services is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and submission guidelines. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on a single price-based evaluation criterion.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement procedures. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope. The CPV code is specific. No disputes or immediate regulatory red flags were detected in the provided data. The use of electronic submission and a designated platform contributes to compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the scope of design work for the kindergarten's second stage. Key documents like technical specifications and the draft contract are referenced, providing necessary detail. Evaluation criteria are mentioned, although the primary reliance on price could be more nuanced.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. Essential documents for eligibility and technical requirements are linked or described. However, details on the specific content of all 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' and some of the referenced 'TENDER DOCUMENTS' (e.g., content of 'Vastavustingimused') could be more explicitly summarized within the tender notice itself.

Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted electronically, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed. Criteria for evaluation are stated, with a primary focus on cost. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies; the eligibility and technical requirements are standard. The decision to not divide into lots is justified by efficiency.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandatory, which is practical. Key dates are provided. Contract duration is specified. Financing information and a precise start date for the contract are not explicitly detailed in the provided summary, which impacts practicality. The 'Tender Valid' period is noted.

Missing explicit contract start date.
Financing information not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value are populated correctly. Dates are logical and do not indicate conflicts. No suspension or disputes are noted. The provided data is consistent and follows a clear structure.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not stated as being EU funded. This represents a significant omission in aligning with modern public procurement goals.

No mention of green procurement criteria.
No mention of social responsibility criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical description and scope.
Electronic submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined eligibility and technical requirements.
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration.

Concerns

Primary evaluation criterion is cost, potentially overlooking quality nuances.
Lack of sustainability (green, social, innovation) considerations.
Some key contractual details (start date, financing) are not explicitly provided in the summary.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating weighted quality criteria alongside price to ensure optimal project outcomes.
2. Integrate sustainability objectives (e.g., eco-friendly design practices, social impact) into evaluation or technical requirements.
3. Provide a clear contract start date and reference financing sources for greater transparency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline