Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of state road 18178 Värska - Ulitina "Saatse saabas" km 6.2-10.6

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307226
Value
€1,680,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 12, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of construction of State Road 18178 Värska - Ulitina "Saatse saapa" km 6.2-10.6100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,680,000
Duration
8 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of state road 18178 Värska - Ulitina "Saatse saapas" km 6.2-10.6 in accordance with the conditions set out in the public procurement tender documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender is a pure cost-driven procurement with a 100% weight on price. A winning strategy will focus on meticulous cost optimization, efficient project execution, and a clear demonstration of value for money. While social and innovative aspects are not explicitly evaluated, demonstrating compliance and efficiency can indirectly enhance perceived value.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering the highest quality road construction at the most competitive price.

Efficient Execution: Leveraging streamlined processes and proven expertise to complete the project on time and within budget.

Reliable Partnership: A trusted contractor committed to meeting all contractual obligations and exceeding expectations.

Key Opportunities
Deep dive into the cost list (HD IV kululoend.xlsx) to identify all possible cost-saving measures.
Thorough review of technical specifications (HD III Tehniline kirjeldus ja selle lisad.zip) to ensure no hidden costs or complexities are overlooked.
Leveraging existing resources and efficient supply chains to minimize material and labor costs.
Proactive engagement with subcontractors to secure favorable pricing and ensure their compliance with exclusion grounds.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct rigorous cost analysis, explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality, and consider lean operational strategies. Benchmark against industry standards for similar projects.

Potential for unforeseen site conditions or complexities not fully captured in the provided documents.

Conduct a thorough site visit (if permitted), review historical data for the area, and build a small contingency into the cost list for minor unforeseen issues, ensuring it remains competitive.

Ensuring full compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and Hankepass requirements.

Dedicate resources to meticulously review and complete all documentation, seek legal/expert advice if necessary, and ensure all subcontractors also meet these criteria.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced road construction company with a proven track record in similar-sized projects in Estonia, possessing strong cost control mechanisms, efficient supply chain management, and a deep understanding of local regulations and permitting processes. The ideal bidder will have a lean operational structure and access to cost-effective resources.
Key Requirements
Submission of completed cost list in Excel format (HD IV kululoend.xlsx)
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds and Hankepass (ESPD) requirements
Technical specifications and annexes (HD III Tehniline kirjeldus ja selle lisad.zip)
Electronic submission via e-procurement environment by the deadline
Key Discriminators
Demonstrably lowest bid price achieved through optimized costings.
A clear and concise project execution plan that highlights efficiency and timely delivery.
A robust risk management approach that instills confidence in the contracting authority.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly evaluated, consider incorporating a commitment to local employment where feasible within the cost structure, framing it as an efficiency benefit (e.g., reduced travel costs for local workforce).
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of construction of State Road 18178 Värska - Ulitina "Saatse saapa" km 6.2-10.6100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible bid price by meticulously analyzing the provided cost list (HD IV kululoend.xlsx). Identify opportunities for cost savings in all line items, including materials, labor, equipment, permits, and site maintenance. Benchmark against historical project data and industry averages to ensure competitiveness without sacrificing essential quality or compliance. Consider economies of scale and efficient resource allocation.

Recommendations5
Master the Cost List for Price Dominance
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct an exhaustive line-by-line analysis of the 'HD IV kululoend.xlsx'. Identify every opportunity for cost reduction through efficient sourcing, optimized labor deployment, innovative construction methods (within technical specs), and streamlined site management. Benchmark against similar projects to ensure the bid is aggressively competitive.

Directly maximizes score in the 100% cost-weighted evaluation.
Zero Tolerance for Exclusion Grounds
CriticalMed effort

Dedicate significant resources to meticulously review and complete all mandatory exclusion grounds and the Hankepass (ESPD). Ensure all subcontractors also fully comply. Any omission or error here will lead to immediate disqualification, regardless of price.

Ensures bid eligibility and avoids disqualification.
Thorough Technical Specification Review
HighMed effort

Scrutinize 'HD III Tehniline kirjeldus ja selle lisad.zip' to fully understand all technical requirements. Identify any potential for cost efficiencies in meeting these specifications or any areas where over-specification might be present, allowing for precise and cost-effective solutions.

Prevents costly errors or omissions and informs cost optimization.
Proactive Subcontractor Vetting and Pricing
HighMed effort

Engage potential subcontractors early. Secure competitive pricing and ensure their full compliance with exclusion grounds. Clearly define scope and responsibilities to avoid disputes and cost overruns.

Secures competitive pricing and mitigates supply chain risks.
Highlight Project Efficiency and Timeline Certainty
MediumLow effort

While price is paramount, a clear, concise, and credible project execution plan that emphasizes efficiency, proven methodologies, and a high degree of certainty in meeting the 8-month duration can build confidence and subtly reinforce the value proposition.

Builds trust and reinforces the perception of a reliable, cost-effective partner.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising essential quality or compliance. Emphasize lean operations and efficient resource utilization to justify the aggressive pricing. Highlight a proven track record of delivering similar projects on time and within budget to build confidence in the ability to execute efficiently.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted electronically via the e-procurement environment.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-06 10:00:00.
--The tender is for construction works related to Riigitee 18178 Värska - Ulitina "Saatse saapa" km 6.2-10.6.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Grounds for exclusion are detailed in the public procurement basic document.
--The tender documents describe conditions for checking subcontractors, focusing on exclusion grounds related to fraud, money laundering, terrorism financing, and human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their acceptance of the tender notice conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost list in Excel format.
--Bidders must mark trade secrets in their bid if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Technical specifications and their annexes are provided in 'HD III Tehniline kirjeldus ja selle lisad.zip'.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid price will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--A cost list detailing specific costs and quantities for various construction works (e.g., sampling, permits, site maintenance, clearing, grubbing, clearing of land) is provided by the contracting authority in 'HD IV kululoend.xlsx'.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307226_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 29.9 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on exclusion grounds related to fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, and human trafficking.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307226_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender notice conditions, submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel, and declare any business secrets within the bid, if applicable.

HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV kululoend.xlsx -- 28.1 KB

The tenderer presents a cost breakdown including detailed costs and quantities for various construction works such as sampling, permits, site maintenance, clearing, grubbing, and land preparation.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307226_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307226_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.7 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence and containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions to be fulfilled electronically by the bidder.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 33.7 KB

The tender's foundational document outlines the general tender procedure conditions, bidder exclusion grounds, and qualification requirements, available on the e-procurement platform.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road construction is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a standard e-procurement process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability criteria and some documentation is not machine-readable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, includes a proper CPV code, and has reasonable deadlines. No disputes or suspensions are noted, indicating good regulatory compliance. The procedure type 'A' (Open Procedure) is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description is clear and references foundational documents for detailed conditions. Specific requirements like the cost list format and Hankepass are outlined. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting'.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the AI could not process some crucial technical and contract documents due to their file formats (.zip). The number of attached documents is adequate.

Inability to analyze essential technical and contract documents due to .zip format.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed. Criteria are objective (lowest price gets maximum score). No specific company tailoring was detected.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is practical. However, the contract start date is not specified. Financing information is also absent. The duration of the contract (8 months) is clear.

Contract start date not specified.
Financing information is missing.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic. However, no specific social aspects or innovation objectives are detailed within the provided summary information. It is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of specific details on social aspects and innovation objectives.
No explicit mention of EU funding.

Strengths

Clear description and requirements linked to foundational documents.
Standard e-procurement process with electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Sufficient basic information provided.

Concerns

Inability to fully assess technical and contractual details due to inaccessible file formats (.zip).
Missing contract start date and financing information.
Limited detail on specific sustainability (social/innovation) aspects despite 'Green Procurement' mention.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all essential tender documents are provided in machine-readable or easily accessible formats.
2. Include the contract start date and relevant financing details.
3. Elaborate on specific social and innovation criteria if 'Green Procurement' is to be effectively evaluated.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline