Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of state road 18178 Värska - Ulitina "Saatse saabas" km 6.2-10.6

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307226
Value
€1,680,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 12, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of construction of State Road 18178 Värska - Ulitina "Saatse saapa" km 6.2-10.6100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,680,000
Duration
8 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of state road 18178 Värska - Ulitina "Saatse saapa" km 6.2-10.6 in accordance with the conditions set out in the public procurement tender documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted electronically via the e-procurement environment.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-06 10:00:00.
--The tender is for construction works related to Riigitee 18178 Värska - Ulitina "Saatse saapa" km 6.2-10.6.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Grounds for exclusion are detailed in the public procurement basic document.
--The tender documents describe conditions for checking subcontractors, focusing on exclusion grounds related to fraud, money laundering, terrorism financing, and human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their acceptance of the tender notice conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed cost list in Excel format.
--Bidders must mark trade secrets in their bid if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Technical specifications and their annexes are provided in 'HD III Tehniline kirjeldus ja selle lisad.zip'.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid price will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--A cost list detailing specific costs and quantities for various construction works (e.g., sampling, permits, site maintenance, clearing, grubbing, clearing of land) is provided by the contracting authority in 'HD IV kululoend.xlsx'.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307226_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 29.9 KB

This document outlines the conditions for controlling subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on exclusion grounds related to fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, and human trafficking.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307226_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender notice conditions, submit a completed cost breakdown in Excel, and declare any business secrets within the bid, if applicable.

HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV kululoend.xlsx -- 28.1 KB

The tenderer presents a cost breakdown including detailed costs and quantities for various construction works such as sampling, permits, site maintenance, clearing, grubbing, and land preparation.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307226_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, where the lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307226_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.7 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence and containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions to be fulfilled electronically by the bidder.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 33.7 KB

The tender's foundational document outlines the general tender procedure conditions, bidder exclusion grounds, and qualification requirements, available on the e-procurement platform.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road construction is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a standard e-procurement process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability criteria and some documentation is not machine-readable.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, includes a proper CPV code, and has reasonable deadlines. No disputes or suspensions are noted, indicating good regulatory compliance. The procedure type 'A' (Open Procedure) is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description is clear and references foundational documents for detailed conditions. Specific requirements like the cost list format and Hankepass are outlined. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting'.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the AI could not process some crucial technical and contract documents due to their file formats (.zip). The number of attached documents is adequate.

Inability to analyze essential technical and contract documents due to .zip format.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed. Criteria are objective (lowest price gets maximum score). No specific company tailoring was detected.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is practical. However, the contract start date is not specified. Financing information is also absent. The duration of the contract (8 months) is clear.

Contract start date not specified.
Financing information is missing.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic. However, no specific social aspects or innovation objectives are detailed within the provided summary information. It is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Lack of specific details on social aspects and innovation objectives.
No explicit mention of EU funding.

Strengths

Clear description and requirements linked to foundational documents.
Standard e-procurement process with electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Sufficient basic information provided.

Concerns

Inability to fully assess technical and contractual details due to inaccessible file formats (.zip).
Missing contract start date and financing information.
Limited detail on specific sustainability (social/innovation) aspects despite 'Green Procurement' mention.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all essential tender documents are provided in machine-readable or easily accessible formats.
2. Include the contract start date and relevant financing details.
3. Elaborate on specific social and innovation criteria if 'Green Procurement' is to be effectively evaluated.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline