Skip to main content
Tenders

Lifting of metal structures of ash outlets 3 and 4 of Eesti Power Plant by 4 m

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307197
Value
€100,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 13, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Estonian power plant ash field shaft outflows 3 and 4 metal structures lifting by 4 m, total bid price excluding VAT100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€100,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to lift the metal structures of ash outlets 3 and 4 of Eesti Power Plant by 4 m, within the scope and conditions specified in the legislation of the Republic of Estonia and the tender documents. For the purpose of familiarizing with the scope of work and resolving questions related to the preparation and submission of the offer, bidders have the right to participate in an organized site visit, which will take place on 18.03.2026. Participants will gather at 10:00 AM at Enefit Power OÜ Eesti Elektrijaam (main gate building) at the address: Auvere village, Narva-Jõesuu city, 40107 Ida-Virumaa county. To participate in the site visit, bidders must register by the contact person's email address no later than 17.03.2026 at 2:00 PM. Contact person: Mihhail Iljin, Project Manager, mobile +372 5636 6145, email: mihhail.iljin@enefit.com. Before the start of the site visit, the bidder must obtain a visitor access permit at the main gate of Eesti Power Plant based on an identity document.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bids must be submitted in a specific format, including the bid cost.
--The tender documents clarify conditions for joint offers and business secrets.
--All references to standards or other bases in the tender documents shall be read as supplemented by "or equivalent".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm that no exclusion grounds as stipulated by law apply to them.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be registered in the business register of their country of establishment, if required.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit Form 2 listing previous contracts, their names, execution periods, and brief descriptions to prove experience.
--Bidders must submit Form 3 listing responsible specialists with their required qualifications and supporting documents for construction manager, welding coordinator, and welders.
--Bidders have the option to participate in an introductory visit to familiarize themselves with the scope of work and questions, requiring prior registration and presentation of an identity document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit their bid cost and cost calculation according to the provided form (Form 1) for tender evaluation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307197_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.4 KB

The tender document clarifies joint offers, trade secrets, and submission conditions, requiring the tender price to be submitted in a specific format.

Vorm 1. Pakkumuse vormXLS
Vorm 1 Pakkumuse vorm.xlsx -- 19.7 KB

Submit your bid's cost and expense calculation according to the provided form, which is necessary for tender evaluation.

Vorm 2. Lepingute nimekiriDOC
Vorm 2 Lepingute nimekiri.docx -- 26.9 KB

The bidder must submit Form 2, listing previous contracts, their names, execution periods, and brief descriptions to demonstrate their experience.

Vorm 3. Vastutavate spetsialistide nimekiriDOC
Vorm 3 Vastutavate spetsialistide nimekiri.do... -- 27.9 KB

Bidders must submit Form 3, listing responsible specialists with their required qualifications and supporting documents for a construction manager, welding coordinator, and welders.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307197_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.6 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
307197_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 10.6 KB

The bidder must confirm that no exclusion grounds apply to them and must be registered in their country's commercial register if required.

Tutvumisvisiidi infoDOC
307197_tutvumisvisiidi info.docx -- 26.0 KB

Bidders have the opportunity to participate in an introductory visit to familiarize themselves with the scope of work and submission questions, requiring prior registration and presentation of identification.

Juhised pakkujatele (väikehange)PDF
Juhised pakkujatele_Väikehange RHR_14092022.p... -- 458.7 KB

This document provides instructions for bidders in a small procurement procedure, outlining the conditions and procedures for submitting bids.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for structural enhancements at the Estonian power plant is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a fair process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to most legal requirements, including proper CPV code and a reasonable timeline. The procedure is clear, and no disputes are reported. The provided contract start date is logical following the submission deadline.

Clarity80/100

The description of the work is clear, and requirements are documented. The use of specific forms for technical capability and financial proposals enhances clarity. The option for an introductory visit further aids understanding.

Completeness70/100

Basic information, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date, is present. Key documents like technical specifications and contract forms are mentioned, although some are in a non-analyzable format. The submission deadline and opening date are clearly stated.

Some important documents (.zip files) are not accessible for analysis.
Fairness85/100

The process is fair, with full document access indicated and value disclosed. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. The criteria for evaluation are clear, and the 'or equivalent' clause for standards promotes fair competition.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is supported. The contract start date is specified. Financing conditions are detailed within the tender documents. However, the lack of direct URLs for all documents might slightly hinder immediate access.

Lack of direct URLs for all tender documents.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are consistently populated. The tender status and dates are logical, with no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear technical and financial submission requirements via forms.
Provision for an introductory site visit.
Use of 'or equivalent' clause for standards.
Electronic submission and e-procurement platform.

Concerns

Absence of explicit sustainability criteria.
Inaccessibility of some key documents (.zip files) for full analysis.
Slight inconvenience due to lack of direct document URLs.

Recommendations

1. In future tenders, explicitly integrate sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation) where applicable.
2. Ensure all tender documents are provided in universally accessible formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline