Skip to main content
Tenders

Maintenance of additional ditches in the Vennisaare-Kulli land reclamation system

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307184
Value
€100,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€100,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of the Vennisaare-Kulli land reclamation system (1469 ha), located in the villages of Iia and Supsi, Põhja Sakala municipality, Viljandi county.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must submit a price offer using the provided form.
--The price offer form requires details on work description, unit of measure, volume, unit price, and total amount.
--A bid guarantee is required.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated, but implied by general procurement law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidder must provide a self-declaration (Hankepass) as initial proof instead of certificates from authorities or third parties.
--Bidder must confirm compliance with tender conditions.
--Bidder must provide clarification on equivalency if applicable.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The work involves maintenance of additional ditches in the Vennisaare-Kulli drainage system.
--Specific tasks include bush mowing, stump grubbing, and milling.
--Work must be performed in accordance with applicable legislation and technical requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The estimated value of the tender is 100,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307184_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.0 KB

The contracting authority requires a bid security, a power of attorney for joint bidders (if applicable), and confirmation of compliance with tender conditions, including clarification of equivalency.

Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vorm_Vennisaare-Kulli... -- 20.7 KB

Bidders must submit a price offer form for ditch maintenance work, entering the work description, unit of measure, volume, unit price, and total amount.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307184_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307184_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 43.3 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the economic operator's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

HankedokumentDOC
HD 5.docx -- 58.1 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for the maintenance of additional ditches in the Vennisaare-Kulli land reclamation system, based on the conditions set forth in the tender documents.

Lisa 3 – Hankelepingu vormDOC
Lisa 3- Hankelepingu vorm_Vennisaare-Kulli MS... -- 67.8 KB

This document is a draft contract form outlining the terms and appendices for carrying out forest improvement works.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus_Vennisaare-Kulli MS_26_Li... -- 45.9 KB

The contracting authority seeks a contractor for the maintenance of additional ditches in the Vennisaare-Kulli land reclamation system, involving brush cutting, stump removal, and milling, in compliance with applicable laws and technical requirements.

Vennissaare plaanPDF
Vennisaare 2026 joon1.pdf -- 6.3 MB

The Vennissaare plan outlines the maintenance works for additional ditches in the drainage system, which are necessary for the fulfillment of the tender contract.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for drainage system maintenance is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are indicated. The use of 'Hankepass' (ESPD) aligns with standard practices.

Clarity80/100

The description of the work is clear, detailing the specific tasks involved (bush mowing, stump grubbing, milling). Requirements are documented, and the evaluation criteria (lowest price) are specified. Conditions for contract modification are also clear.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration. Key documents like the price offer form and technical specifications are available. However, some attached documents are in formats not directly analyzable by AI, which could be a minor completeness issue for automated systems.

Fairness85/100

The tender is accessible via e-procurement, and the estimated value is disclosed. Criteria are objective (lowest price). The requirement for a bid guarantee is standard. There are no obvious signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a URL for the e-procurement portal is provided. The contract start date is specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while duration is mentioned, specific contract start/end dates beyond the initial period are not fully elaborated.

Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening, contract start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
No mention of social aspects or innovation.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and scope of work.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Use of e-procurement platform.
Logical and consistent timeline data.

Concerns

Absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).
Some attached documents in non-AI-analyzable formats.
Limited explicit detail on financing.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., waste management, use of eco-friendly equipment).
2. Ensure all tender documents are provided in universally accessible formats.
3. Provide more detailed information regarding contract financing.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline