Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Rental of modular classrooms for Tapa Vald Gymnasium and modular groups for Kindergarten Pisipõnn

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307157
Value
€250,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 16, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Rental of modular groups for Kindergarten Pisipõnn100%
Rental of modular classrooms for Tapa Valla Gymnasium100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Tender Opening

April 17, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€250,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€99,138
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
262 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Due to the reconstruction of the group rooms at Tapa Vald Gymnasium and Kindergarten Pisipõnn, Tapa Rural Municipality needs space to accommodate classes and kindergarten groups during the construction period. For this purpose, it is planned to install prefabricated modular classrooms on the plot adjacent to the Tapa Gymnasium building (Nooruse tn 2, Tapa) and prefabricated modular group rooms on the plot of Kindergarten Pisipõnn (Nooruse tn 11, Tapa) for seventeen (17) months, with the possibility of extending the rental period by up to two months.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses solely on cost for modular unit rental over 17 months. A winning strategy will prioritize aggressive pricing while meticulously addressing all mandatory and eligibility requirements, particularly the exclusion of Russian-connected entities. Demonstrating reliability and a clear understanding of the full lifecycle cost will be crucial.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and reliable provider for temporary modular educational spaces.

Guaranteed compliance and risk-free delivery of modular solutions.

Key Opportunities
Aggressive pricing strategy due to 100% cost evaluation.
Potential for a profitable extension if the initial 17-month period is successful.
Leveraging existing modular stock to reduce lead times and costs.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all cost drivers and optimize pricing without compromising quality or profitability. Explore economies of scale if bidding for both locations. Consider offering slight value-adds that don't significantly increase cost but enhance perceived value.

Strict adherence to exclusion grounds regarding Russian Federation connections.

Implement a rigorous due diligence process for all subcontractors and suppliers. Obtain written declarations from all parties involved confirming no Russian Federation connections. Maintain clear audit trails for compliance.

Ensuring accurate costing for the entire lifecycle, including dismantling and restoration.

Develop detailed site assessment plans and cost models for each phase. Factor in potential unforeseen site conditions and restoration complexities. Obtain quotes from reliable local partners for site preparation and restoration if not handled in-house.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A modular building supplier with a proven track record in delivering temporary educational or childcare facilities. They should possess strong cost management capabilities, efficient logistics, and a robust supply chain that guarantees compliance with the exclusion grounds. Experience with local site preparation and utility connections in Estonia would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Confirmation of no subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
Accurate and complete submission of VORM 1 Osa 1 and VORM 1 Osa 2 (Cost Forms).
Understanding and pricing of the full rental lifecycle: design, site prep, assembly, monthly rental (17 months), dismantling, and restoration.
Submission of Hankepass (tender pass) in the specified format.
Compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated ability to offer the absolute lowest total cost of ownership over the 17-month period, including all lifecycle elements.
Unquestionable compliance with the Russian Federation exclusion criteria, backed by robust documentation.
A clear and concise proposal that simplifies the evaluation process for the contracting authority, highlighting cost-effectiveness at every step.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, consider a commitment to using locally sourced materials for site preparation or restoration where feasible, and to employing local labor for assembly/dismantling if possible. This can be framed as a community benefit without significant cost increase.
Bid Focus Areas
Rental of modular classrooms for Tapa Valla Gymnasium100.0%

Submit the lowest possible price that is still profitable. Ensure all cost components (design, site prep, assembly, monthly rental, dismantling, restoration) are meticulously calculated and presented clearly in VORM 1 Osa 1.

Rental of modular groups for Kindergarten Pisipõnn100.0%

Submit the lowest possible price that is still profitable. Ensure all cost components (design, site prep, assembly, monthly rental, dismantling, restoration) are meticulously calculated and presented clearly in VORM 1 Osa 2. Aim for a competitive price that is likely to be the lowest.

Recommendations6
Aggressive Costing for Maximum Score
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost evaluation, develop a highly competitive pricing strategy. Analyze all cost components thoroughly to identify areas for optimization without compromising quality. Consider offering a slightly lower margin on the initial 17-month rental to secure the contract, with the expectation of profit from potential extensions or future work.

Maximizes score in evaluation criteria, significantly increasing win probability.
Robust Compliance with Exclusion Grounds
CriticalMed effort

Implement a stringent due diligence process for all subcontractors and suppliers. Obtain written declarations confirming no connections to the Russian Federation. Prepare to provide evidence if requested. This is a non-negotiable requirement.

Avoids mandatory exclusion, ensuring bid remains in contention.
Detailed Lifecycle Costing
HighHigh effort

Ensure the cost forms (VORM 1 Osa 1 & 2) accurately reflect the entire project lifecycle: design, site preparation, utility construction, module assembly, monthly rental for 17 months, module dismantling, and restoration of the original condition. Underestimating any of these can lead to unprofitability.

Ensures accurate pricing, prevents financial loss, and builds trust with the client.
Streamlined Site Preparation and Restoration Plan
MediumMed effort

While cost is paramount, a clear and efficient plan for site preparation and restoration can subtly differentiate. Highlight any innovative or cost-effective methods you employ for these phases, demonstrating competence beyond just the modular units themselves.

Adds perceived value and competence, potentially influencing borderline decisions.
Contingency Planning for Site Conditions
HighMed effort

Factor in potential unforeseen site conditions during the site preparation and restoration phases. Include a small contingency in your costings to cover minor unexpected issues, ensuring you can meet the 'restoration of original condition' requirement without incurring significant losses.

Protects profitability and ensures contract fulfillment.
Local Employment/Materials Commitment (Optional)
LowLow effort

If feasible and cost-neutral, commit to utilizing local labor for assembly/dismantling or sourcing local materials for site works. Frame this as a benefit to the Tapa community.

Minor positive perception, can be a tie-breaker in very close bids.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider with a proven ability to deliver on time and within budget, while strictly adhering to all compliance requirements. Emphasize the 'lowest price' advantage directly.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender is for the rental of modular classrooms and modular groups for Lasteaed Pisipõnn.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-17 07:00:00.
--The value of the tender is 250,000.0 EUR.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm they do not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected to the Russian Federation.
--Submit a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable.
--Mark any business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bids will be evaluated for the rental of modular classrooms and groups, covering design, site preparation, assembly, and rental fee.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit VORM 1 Osa 1 (Cost Form) detailing rental costs for Tapa Valla Gümnaasium modular classrooms.
--Submit VORM 1 Osa 2 (Cost Form) to complete the cost table for the kindergarten modular groups rental bid.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307157_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.9 KB

Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation, provide a joint bidder authorization if applicable, and declare trade secrets.

Vorm 1 Osa 1 Maksumuse vormXLS
VORM 1 OSA 1 Maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 18.9 KB

Bidders must submit Form 1 Part 1 Cost Form, detailing the costs associated with the rental of modular classrooms for Tapa Vald Gymnasium.

Vorm 1 Osa 2 Maksumuse vormXLS
VORM 1 OSA 2 Maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 18.5 KB

The bidder must submit Form 1 Part 2 to complete the cost table for the kindergarten modular group rental tender.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307157_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.5 KB

The contracting authority Tapa Municipality will evaluate bids for the rental of modular classrooms and groups, where the lowest price receives the maximum score, covering design, site preparation, assembly, and rental fees.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307157_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 74.8 KB

The procurement passport (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
307157 Lisa 3 Lepingu projekt.docx -- 26.6 KB

The draft contract outlines the parties to the lease agreement, the integral parts of the contract, and the subject of the contract related to the rental of modular classrooms and groups.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
307157_Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.docx -- 40.9 KB

This document outlines the tender submission process, technical specifications, and requirements for the modular classroom and group rental tender by Tapa Municipality.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for modular classroom rental is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and accessible documentation. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria beyond the lowest price and has limited focus on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable, and there's no indication of disputes. Regulatory compliance is presumed.

Clarity80/100

The description of the need for modular classrooms and groups is clear, and the requirements for submission are documented. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria beyond price reduces overall clarity.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria beyond lowest price.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration (rent period), and attached documents. However, the exact contract duration, including extension possibilities, could be more precisely defined upfront.

Contract duration could be more precisely defined upfront.
Fairness85/100

The tender provides full document access and discloses the estimated value. The procedure is electronic, and criteria, while not fully detailed, appear objective. The requirement to exclude bidders connected to the Russian Federation is a common, non-discriminatory measure.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and the tender platform URL is provided. However, the specific contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing details beyond the estimated value are missing.

Specific contract start date is not explicitly stated.
Financing details beyond the estimated value are missing.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, and the tender status suggests it is active and without ongoing issues.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of needs
Full document access and e-submission
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value
Presence of key tender documents (draft contract, cost forms)

Concerns

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria beyond lowest price
Absence of explicit sustainability and innovation focus
Missing specific contract start date

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and competitiveness.
2. Incorporate sustainability or innovation elements where applicable.
3. Clarify the exact contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline