Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of Aruaru land reclamation system and roads

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307147
Value
€400,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 10, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€400,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of Aruaru land reclamation system and roads
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Aruaru drainage system and road reconstruction prioritizes cost-effectiveness. A winning strategy will focus on a highly competitive price, demonstrating robust technical capability in drainage and road works, and meticulous adherence to submission requirements. While social value and innovation are not explicitly requested, demonstrating efficiency and long-term value can be a subtle differentiator.

Key Winning Messages

Most Cost-Effective Solution for Aruaru Drainage and Road Reconstruction

Proven Technical Expertise in Drainage and Road Infrastructure

Reliable and Compliant Bid Submission

Key Opportunities
Leverage the explicit focus on total cost for maximum points.
Thoroughly analyze and address all technical specifications to avoid disqualification and demonstrate capability.
Ensure flawless submission process to avoid administrative disqualification.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to evaluation criteria.

Conduct a thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures without compromising quality, and aim for the absolute lowest viable price. Explore efficiencies in logistics, material sourcing, and labor deployment.

Potential for high volume of bids given the single lot nature and moderate value.

Focus on meticulous bid preparation to ensure no errors or omissions that could lead to disqualification. Ensure all mandatory documents are correctly completed and submitted on time.

Lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond price.

While price is paramount, ensure the technical proposal is robust and clearly demonstrates the ability to meet all technical specifications. This builds confidence and can be a tie-breaker if multiple bids are very close in price.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A medium-sized construction company with proven experience in civil engineering, specifically in drainage systems and road construction/reconstruction. The company should have a strong track record of delivering projects on time and within budget, possess the necessary certifications and licenses, and have a lean operational structure that allows for competitive pricing.
Key Requirements
Acceptance of terms and conditions
Demonstrated technical expertise in drainage and road reconstruction
Submission of bid using the provided form (Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vorm_Aruaru MPS ja teed.xlsx)
Bid guarantee
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Detailed technical specifications adherence (Lisa 4 Tehniline kirjeldus_Aruaru MPS ja teed.docx)
Key Discriminators
A highly competitive and optimized price point that demonstrably offers the best value.
A clear and concise technical proposal that directly addresses all aspects of 'Lisa 4 Tehniline kirjeldus_Aruaru MPS ja teed.docx' with evidence of past successful projects.
A flawless bid submission, free of errors or omissions, demonstrating attention to detail and professionalism.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, consider including a brief statement on commitment to local employment or responsible material sourcing if it can be achieved without significantly increasing costs. Frame it as an operational efficiency or community engagement benefit rather than a primary social value commitment.
Bid Focus Areas
Total CostMaximum Points

Achieve the lowest possible price that is still profitable and sustainable. Conduct a detailed cost breakdown and identify all opportunities for efficiency. Benchmark against similar projects if possible.

Technical CapabilityImplicit (to meet requirements)

Ensure the technical proposal directly addresses all requirements in 'Lisa 4 Tehniline kirjeldus_Aruaru MPS ja teed.docx'. Highlight relevant past experience and expertise in drainage and road reconstruction. Provide clear methodologies and project plans.

Recommendations6
Meticulous Bid Form Completion
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure 'Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vorm_Aruaru MPS ja teed.xlsx' is filled out completely, accurately, and without any errors. Double-check all calculations and data entries. Any discrepancies could lead to disqualification.

Avoids administrative disqualification and ensures the bid is considered.
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given that price is the primary evaluation criterion, develop a highly competitive pricing strategy. This involves detailed cost analysis, identifying all potential efficiencies, and aiming for the lowest viable price. Consider the estimated value of 400,000 EUR as a benchmark.

Maximizes score in the primary evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Thorough Technical Specification Review
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct an in-depth review of 'Lisa 4 Tehniline kirjeldus_Aruaru MPS ja teed.docx'. Ensure the technical proposal clearly demonstrates the capability to meet all specified requirements for drainage system and road reconstruction. Use clear language and provide concrete examples of past performance.

Ensures technical compliance and builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute the project.
Bid Guarantee Compliance
HighMed effort

Ensure the bid guarantee is obtained and submitted in the correct format and amount as per tender requirements. Verify the validity period and issuing institution.

Prevents disqualification due to non-compliance with a mandatory submission requirement.
Demonstrate Operational Efficiency
MediumMed effort

While not explicitly asked for, subtly highlight how your operational structure and project management approach lead to cost efficiencies and timely delivery. This can be woven into the technical proposal or a brief cover letter.

Positions the bidder as a highly capable and efficient partner, potentially influencing perception beyond just price.
Joint Bidders Power of Attorney
MediumLow effort

If bidding as a joint venture or consortium, ensure the power of attorney for joint bidders is correctly prepared, signed, and submitted as per requirements.

Ensures the bid is valid if submitted by a joint entity.
Competitive Positioning
To gain a competitive advantage, focus on presenting the most compelling price-to-quality ratio. While price is dominant, a technically sound and well-presented bid that clearly meets all specifications will be crucial. Emphasize reliability and a proven track record in similar projects to instill confidence in the contracting authority, especially if multiple bidders offer very similar prices.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must submit a bid according to the requirements outlined in the tender documents.
--A bid guarantee is required.
--Bidders must use the provided bid form: "Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vorm_Aruaru MPS ja teed.xlsx".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have been convicted of fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must meet the compliance conditions set by the contracting authority.
--Bidders must confirm their acceptance of the terms and conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is for the reconstruction of the Aruaru drainage system and roads, requiring specific technical expertise.
--Detailed technical specifications are provided in "Lisa 4 Tehniline kirjeldus_Aruaru MPS ja teed.docx".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on total cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307147_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 32.6 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for criminal convictions related to fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing before contract execution.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307147_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.0 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to comply with conditions, including the price offer form, joint bidder authorization, bid security, and confirmation of acceptance of terms.

Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vorm_Aruaru MPS ja te... -- 47.9 KB

This document is the price offer form that must be completed to participate in the tender "Aruaru land reclamation system and road reconstruction".

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307147_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority primarily evaluates bids based on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307147_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.3 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument Aruaru.docx -- 24.4 KB

The tender document provides general information and conditions for the open procurement of the Aruaru land reclamation system and road reconstruction, requiring bidders to submit proposals according to the stated requirements.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2- Hankelepingu vorm_Aruaru MPS ja teed.... -- 70.3 KB

This document is a draft of the procurement contract, outlining the terms of execution and the obligations of the parties for the Aruaru land reclamation system and roads reconstruction tender.

Lisa 4 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 4 Tehniline kirjeldus_Aruaru MPS ja teed... -- 55.2 KB

This technical specification details the requirements for the reconstruction and construction of the Aruaru land reclamation system and roads, including materials, work methods, and compliance with legislation.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for land reclamation and road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on external documents for technical details.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations. Deadlines are specified and seem reasonable for the estimated value. The CPV code is provided, and there is no indication of disputes. The procedure type (Open) is standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented, particularly through the referenced technical specification document. Evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' and primarily cost-based, which is understandable.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the reliance on external documents like 'Lisa 4 Tehniline kirjeldus' for crucial technical details means that the core requirements are not fully contained within the primary tender notice.

Key technical specifications are external documents.
Fairness85/100

The tender is accessible electronically, and the value is disclosed. The criteria are objective (primarily cost-based). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a fair competitive environment. The requirement for a bid guarantee is standard.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a URL for the e-procurement portal is provided. The contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not detailed, and the duration is defined by 'PERIOD' without a specific end date, relying on the contract start and tender validity.

Financing details are not specified.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission Deadline, Opening, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded, which often encourages sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria.
No social responsibility criteria.

Strengths

Clear title and reference number.
Organization and description are well-defined.
Electronic submission and e-procurement are mandated.
Objective evaluation criteria (primarily cost).
Logical and consistent timeline.

Concerns

Reliance on external documents for critical technical specifications.
Lack of explicit sustainability and innovation criteria.
Limited detail on financing.

Recommendations

1. Consider including a summary of key technical requirements within the main tender document for improved accessibility.
2. Integrate sustainability and innovation criteria to align with modern procurement best practices.
3. Provide more detailed information regarding financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline