Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Provision of audit services for the city of Narva for the years 2026-2029

Open
Deadline
23 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
307131
Value
€216,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 12, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of the offer100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€216,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€100,264
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
87%
624 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement is the auditing of the annual reports for the financial years 2026-2029 of the consolidated group and subsidiaries of the city of Narva, as well as the provision of consulting services to the city and its subsidiaries during the term of the procurement contract.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for auditing services for Narva City and its subsidiaries is heavily weighted towards cost. A winning strategy will focus on delivering the lowest possible price while demonstrating robust technical capability and a clear understanding of public sector auditing requirements. Leveraging prior public sector experience will be a key differentiator in tie-breaking scenarios.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Value: Delivering high-quality auditing and consulting services at the most competitive price.

Proven Public Sector Expertise: Demonstrating a track record of successful audits within the public sector, ensuring compliance and efficiency.

Seamless Transition and Delivery: Guaranteeing a smooth and efficient audit process for Narva City and its subsidiaries.

Key Opportunities
Cost optimization through efficient audit methodologies and resource allocation.
Leveraging experience with public sector contracts as a tie-breaker.
Detailed understanding of the specific entities within the Narva City consolidated group.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost weighting.

Conduct a thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without compromising audit quality. Explore efficiencies in audit planning, execution, and reporting. Consider lean auditing techniques and technology where appropriate.

Potential for multiple bidders with similar public sector experience.

While cost is paramount, ensure the bid clearly articulates the depth and breadth of public sector experience, highlighting specific achievements and relevant case studies. Focus on demonstrating a superior understanding of the specific entities involved.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A legally registered auditing firm with proven experience in public sector audits, specifically for municipal entities or similar consolidated groups. The ideal bidder will possess a strong understanding of Estonian auditing standards and regulations, and the capacity to provide efficient and cost-effective auditing and consulting services. Experience with the specific entities listed (SA Narva Linnaelamu, SA Narva Haigla, etc.) would be a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Auditing of annual reports for Narva city consolidated group and subsidiaries (2026-2029)
Provision of consulting services during contract period
Detailed price offer breakdown by year and service (HD Annex 3)
Legal registration and approval by relevant legal acts
Confirmation of agreement with tender conditions
Key Discriminators
The most competitive pricing strategy that still allows for high-quality service delivery.
Demonstrable experience with auditing multiple entities within a consolidated public sector group.
A clear and efficient audit plan tailored to the specific needs of Narva City and its subsidiaries.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, a commitment to local employment or professional development for junior auditors within the Narva region could be a subtle differentiator if opportunities arise to highlight it without impacting cost.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of the offer100.0%

Develop a highly competitive pricing model. Ensure all costs are meticulously calculated and presented according to HD Annex 3. Explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising quality or compliance. The bid must be the lowest to secure maximum points.

Recommendations5
Aggressive Costing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a detailed cost model that identifies all potential efficiencies and cost-saving measures. The bid must be the absolute lowest to achieve maximum score. This requires a deep understanding of internal cost drivers and potential for operational efficiencies.

Directly impacts the highest weighted evaluation criterion, maximizing score and competitive advantage.
Demonstrate Public Sector Audit Expertise
CriticalMed effort

Clearly articulate experience in auditing public sector entities, especially municipal or regional governments and their subsidiaries. Highlight familiarity with relevant Estonian public sector accounting standards and regulations. This is crucial for the tie-breaker scenario.

Increases the likelihood of winning in a tie-break situation and builds confidence in technical capability.
Thoroughly Analyze HD Annex 2 and 3
HighMed effort

Scrutinize the scope of services (HD Annex 2) and the cost breakdown requirements (HD Annex 3). Ensure the bid precisely meets all formatting and content requirements for the price offer. Any deviation can lead to disqualification or scoring penalties.

Ensures compliance with submission requirements and avoids potential disqualification.
Highlight Understanding of Specific Entities
MediumMed effort

If possible, subtly demonstrate an understanding of the unique audit needs or complexities of the listed subsidiaries (e.g., SA Narva Linnaelamu, SA Narva Haigla). This can be done through the consulting services proposed or in the overall audit approach.

Shows a tailored approach and deeper engagement, potentially influencing the contracting authority's perception.
Confirm All Mandatory Requirements
HighMed effort

Carefully review all tender documents for any implied mandatory requirements or exclusion grounds not explicitly stated. Ensure the Hankepass (ESPD) is completed accurately and all eligibility criteria are met.

Prevents disqualification due to non-compliance with fundamental requirements.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising the integrity and quality of auditing services. Emphasize efficiency and a deep understanding of public sector audit requirements. Highlight any specific experience with similar municipal structures or entities within Estonia.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--In case of equal bids, experience with public sector contracts will be preferred.
--The tender documents define requirements for joint bidders' power of attorney, submission of trade secrets, and presentation of bid costs.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be a legally registered entity capable of providing auditing services.
--Must be approved and confirmed by the relevant legal acts.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Auditing of annual reports for the Narva city consolidated group and its subsidiaries for the financial years 2026-2029.
--Provision of consulting services to the city and its subsidiaries during the contract period.
--The scope of services is detailed in HD Annex 2.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated value of the tender is 216,000.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit a detailed price offer for auditing services for 2026-2029, breaking down costs by year and service.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307131_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.7 KB

The tender document outlines requirements for joint bidder authorization, business secret submission, and cost presentation for audit services to the City of Narva.

HD lisa 3 MaksumusDOC
Audiitorhange _HD_ lisa 3 maksumus.docx -- 32.3 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed price offer for audit services for Narva city for the years 2026-2029, breaking down costs by year and service.

HD lisa 5 Pakkuja taotlus riigihankes osalemiseksDOC
Audiitorhange _ HD lisa 5 pakkuja vorm.docx -- 15.0 KB

This document is a bidder's application to participate in the public procurement, confirming acceptance of tender conditions and providing necessary company details.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307131_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.4 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points, and in case of equal bids, preference will be given to experience with public sector contracts.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307131_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 73.3 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion.

Hanke alusdokumendid (HD koos lisadega)DOC
Audiitorhange _ HD koond.doc -- 322.0 KB

Narva city is seeking an auditor service provider for the years 2026-2029, presenting tender base documents that include all requirements and conditions.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for auditing services is generally well-structured with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and requires further documentation for full assessment of all practical aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard public procurement regulations. The CPV code is specific, and the procedure is defined. Deadlines are reasonable given the scope. No disputes or immediate legal red flags are apparent from the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, detailing the scope of auditing and consulting. Key requirements such as staff qualifications are specified. Annexes are referenced for further detail, contributing to overall clarity.

Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value is present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, details on specific documents like 'HD lisa 4' mentioned for the consolidated group description are not fully provided, impacting completeness.

Fairness85/100

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement, promoting fairness. Evaluation criteria based on cost weighting and public sector experience are objective. Access to key documents like 'Hanke alusdokumendid' is implied. No overt tailoring to specific companies is detected.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is confirmed. While the contract start date is clear, the exact availability and content of all 'HD lisa' documents need to be confirmed for practical execution. Financing information is not detailed.

Financing information is not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. The tender status is active. No inconsistencies or contradictions were found in the provided data.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation drivers. While EU funding is not directly negated, it's not highlighted, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Strengths

Clear financial and timeline information
Specific CPV code and evaluation criteria
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
Missing details on certain annex documents ('HD lisa 4')
Limited financing information

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability objectives.
2. Ensure all referenced annex documents are readily accessible and clearly described.
3. Provide more detailed information regarding financing mechanisms.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline