Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of hyperspectral backscatterometer

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307128
Value
€68,800
Location
Estonia
Published
March 06, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total cost of the tender (euros, excl. VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 28, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€68,800
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€80,024
Avg. Bids
1.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
518 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of this procurement procedure is the purchase of a hyperspectral backscatterometer in accordance with the technical specification provided in Annex 1 to the HD.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for a hyperspectral reflectance meter is highly price-sensitive, with cost being the sole evaluation criterion. Winning requires a highly competitive price while rigorously adhering to precise technical specifications for underwater measurements. Differentiation will come from demonstrating superior value through cost-efficiency and robust technical compliance.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: The most cost-effective solution meeting all technical requirements.

Guaranteed Performance: Proven technical compliance for precise underwater measurements.

Key Opportunities
Leverage existing product lines or modular designs to reduce customization costs for underwater specifications.
Offer a streamlined service and support package that minimizes long-term operational costs for the University.
Focus on a lean bid submission process to minimize administrative overhead, directly impacting the final price.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to cost being the sole evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings in manufacturing, sourcing, and delivery. Explore economies of scale if possible. Consider offering tiered pricing or optional add-ons that do not impact the base bid price but can be offered as value-adds.

Ensuring absolute compliance with highly specific technical requirements for underwater measurements without over-engineering.

Dedicate significant resources to technical review and validation. If a standard product requires modification, clearly outline the cost-benefit of these modifications and ensure they are essential for compliance, not optional enhancements.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established supplier of scientific instrumentation with a proven track record in hyperspectral technology, specifically with experience in or ability to adapt equipment for underwater applications. They must possess a lean operational structure to offer a highly competitive price and a robust quality assurance process to guarantee compliance with stringent technical specifications.
Key Requirements
Precise technical specifications for underwater measurements (Annex 1)
Total cost of the bid excluding taxes
Confirmation of reading and accepting tender conditions
Provision of power of attorney (if applicable)
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Key Discriminators
A demonstrably lower total cost of ownership, even if the initial price is slightly higher, through superior reliability and lower maintenance needs.
A clear and concise technical proposal that directly addresses each point in Annex 1, backed by verifiable data or certifications.
A proactive and responsive communication approach during the bid process, demonstrating commitment and professionalism.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'No' is indicated for social aspects, consider a commitment to local training for University staff on the instrument's operation and maintenance, enhancing local capacity and knowledge transfer.
Bid Focus Areas
Total cost of the bid excluding taxes100%

Achieve the lowest possible price through aggressive cost management, efficient supply chain, and optimized operational processes. Ensure all costs are accurately calculated and no hidden expenses are introduced. Clearly present the price breakdown if required.

Recommendations6
Master Technical Specifications for Underwater Use
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly analyze Annex 1 (Technical Description) to understand every nuance of the 'precise technical specifications for underwater measurements'. Ensure the proposed instrument meets or exceeds these requirements. Provide clear, verifiable proof of compliance for each specification.

Ensures eligibility and avoids disqualification. Directly addresses the core need of the contracting authority.
Aggressively Price for Lowest Cost
CriticalHigh effort

Given that cost is the sole evaluation criterion, conduct an exhaustive cost-benefit analysis of your offering. Identify all areas for cost reduction in manufacturing, sourcing, logistics, and overhead. Aim to be the lowest bidder while maintaining profitability.

Directly maximizes the bid's score and win probability.
Demonstrate Value Beyond Price
HighMed effort

While price is paramount, subtly highlight any aspects that offer superior long-term value, such as extended warranty, lower maintenance requirements, or superior durability, without increasing the bid price. This can be done in the technical compliance section or a brief executive summary.

Can sway the decision if multiple bids are very close in price, or if the authority perceives a risk with the absolute lowest bidder.
Verify Power of Attorney Requirements
HighLow effort

Carefully review submission requirements regarding power of attorney. If submitting as a representative or joint bidder, ensure all necessary documentation is correctly prepared and submitted as per the tender notice and base documents to avoid administrative disqualification.

Prevents administrative disqualification, ensuring the bid is formally considered.
Proactive Clarification on Technical Ambiguities
MediumMed effort

If any part of the technical specifications in Annex 1 is unclear or could be interpreted in multiple ways, proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority through the designated channels. This ensures your bid accurately reflects their needs and avoids potential disputes later.

Reduces the risk of technical non-compliance and potential contract disputes.
Propose Local Training on Instrument Operation
LowLow effort

Even though social aspects are not explicitly required, propose a brief, cost-neutral (or very low cost) training session for University of Tartu staff on the operation and basic maintenance of the hyperspectral reflectance meter. This demonstrates a commitment to knowledge transfer and user empowerment.

Adds a positive, albeit minor, element to the bid, potentially creating goodwill.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the optimal balance of technical precision and aggressive pricing. Emphasize your ability to deliver a high-quality, compliant instrument at a price point that represents exceptional value for the University of Tartu. Highlight any efficiencies in your supply chain or manufacturing that enable this competitive pricing.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted according to the conditions set forth in the tender notice and base documents.
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney that authorizes a representative to submit a bid for the procurement of the hyperspectral reflectance meter.
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney for joint bidders, confirming the representative's right to submit a bid and conclude the contract.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must confirm they have read and accept the tender conditions and commit to fulfilling the contract.
--Bidders must provide necessary power of attorney if the bid is submitted by a representative or joint bidders.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm they have read and accept the tender conditions and commit to fulfilling the contract.
--Bidders must provide necessary power of attorney if the bid is submitted by a representative or joint bidders.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The hyperspectral reflectance meter must have precise technical specifications for underwater measurements.
--Bidders must provide proof of compliance with the technical specifications.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The sole evaluation criterion is the total cost of the bid excluding taxes.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307128_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.3 KB

The bidder must confirm familiarity with and full acceptance of tender conditions, commit to contract fulfillment, and submit necessary power of attorney if the bid is submitted by a representative or joint bidders.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307128_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.8 KB

The contracting authority Tartu University will evaluate bids for the purchase of a hyperspectral backscatter meter, with the sole evaluation criterion being the total bid cost excluding VAT, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307128_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 64.2 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response format, but is not intended for completion.

Annex 2 - 3 (forms)DOC
Annex 2 - 3 (forms).docx -- 30.1 KB

This document is a power of attorney authorizing a representative to submit a tender for the purchase of a Hyperspectral Backscatter Instrument for the University of Tartu.

Annex 4 Draft Procurement ContractPDF
Annex 4 Draft Procurement Contract.pdf -- 200.4 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the terms for the purchase of a hyperspectral backscatter instrument, including price, payment conditions, deadlines, and legal provisions.

Hankedokument, Tender Document (31)PDF
Hankedokument, Tender Document (31).pdf -- 226.8 KB

The University of Tartu invites tenders for the purchase of a Hyperspectral Backscatter Instrument through an open procurement procedure, with submissions required according to the terms in the tender notice and base documents.

Instructions for participating in the tendering procedurePDF
Instructions for participating in the tenderi... -- 197.1 KB

This document provides instructions for participating in the tendering procedure, including information on the availability of tender documents, requesting additional information, and compiling bids.

Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseksPDF
Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseks.pdf -- 151.5 KB

This document provides instructions for participating in the procurement procedure, explaining the availability of tender documents, communication, and the submission process.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus Annex 1 Technical descriptionPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus Annex 1 Technical ... -- 200.1 KB

The University of Tartu is seeking a Hyperspectral Backscatter Instrument with precise technical specifications for in-water measurements, and bidders must provide proof of compliance.

Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid)DOC
Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid).docx -- 30.6 KB

Bidders must submit a power of attorney authorizing their representative to submit the bid, and if applicable, a joint bid power of attorney confirming the representative's authority to submit the bid and conclude the contract.

Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 185.0 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the terms for the purchase of a hyperspectral backscatterometer, including price, payment terms, deadlines, and equipment handover.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a hyperspectral reflectance meter is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical submission details could be clearer.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable timeline. The procedure type is standard. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the platform used.

Clarity80/100

The technical description is clear, and the sole evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. Requirements are documented, although the exact format for technical compliance proof could be more detailed.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and contract start date. However, the specific documents required for technical capability proof are not explicitly listed beyond a general requirement to provide proof of compliance.

Specific documentation for technical capability proof not explicitly detailed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, uses e-procurement, and has objective evaluation criteria (lowest price). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied through the e-procurement platform.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated. While a contract start date is provided, the specific financing information is not detailed. The duration is clearly stated. The URL for opening is provided.

Specific financing information not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as evaluation criteria or requirements.

No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications for the required instrument.
Objective and straightforward evaluation criterion (lowest price).
EU funded, indicating adherence to broader standards.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Details on how to provide proof of technical compliance could be more specific.
Financing information is not detailed.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating specific sustainability criteria into the evaluation.
2. Provide more detailed guidance on the format and content for technical compliance documentation.
3. Include information regarding the financing of the procurement.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline