Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login21 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
11 documents available with AI summaries
Bidders must confirm they have reviewed tender conditions, possess necessary rights and authorizations, and submit a power of attorney if the tender presenter is not the legal representative.
The contracting authority requires bidders to submit team CVs for key personnel, detailing their experience as a team leader, including at least 24 months of experience within the last 96 months and leadership of at least two developers.
The tender evaluation criteria include the hourly rate (40%) and the quality of interviews for the full-stack developer and senior developer/solution architect roles (30% each).
The bidder must confirm that neither they nor their representatives have been convicted of criminal offenses, have tax arrears, or committed other violations that would disqualify them from the tender process.
The contractor must ensure that all personal data processed during software development complies with GDPR requirements, implementing necessary technical and organizational measures.
The contracting authority evaluates bids on a 100-point system, considering cost (40 points) and interviews with a full-stack developer and a senior developer/solution architect (30 points each).
This document is a maintenance contract draft detailing the terms for the project management support system (SynDoc) development and maintenance service, including scope of work, remuneration, and ordering procedures.
This document outlines the Contractor's obligations for processing personal data when providing Elering AS's project management support system development and maintenance services, ensuring GDPR compliance.
This document provides instructions for bidders on conducting the public procurement procedure, clarifying the tender's foundational documents, submission process, and grounds for rejection.
This document is a draft framework agreement outlining the terms for software development and maintenance services, including software definitions, work descriptions, and contract principles.
Elering AS is seeking a provider for the development and maintenance services of the project management support system (SynDoc), which involves evolving the existing system into a central project management support system.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for software development and maintenance services for Elering AS's SynDoc system is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable evaluation methodology. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and some practical aspects of e-submission could be improved.
The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including clear procedures and CPV codes. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are noted. The 'Framework Agreement: WITHOUT_REOPENING_COMPETITION' characteristic is noted.
The description of the SynDoc system and the scope of work (development and maintenance as a single service) is clear. Technical requirements, including GDPR compliance and key personnel qualifications, are well-defined. Evaluation criteria are specified.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and start date. Key documents like contract drafts and technical specifications are referenced. However, the 'Raamlepingu algusaeg RHRi üldandmete sektsioonis on indikatiivne' note suggests potential ambiguity regarding the definitive start date.
The tender is open to all bidders, with objective evaluation criteria based on hourly rate and interview quality. The maximum of one participant for the framework agreement is unusual and could be perceived as restrictive, though it might be justified by the nature of a framework agreement. Full document access is implied.
E-submission is indicated, which is positive. However, the financing condition is stated to be in a separate document ('Raam- ja hankelepingu projekt'), which could be more directly presented. The contract start date is provided but noted as indicative in another section.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates appear logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The 'Raamlepingu algusaeg RHRi üldandmete sektsioonis on indikatiivne' is a minor point of potential inconsistency.
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, which limits the potential for integrated sustainability goals.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required