Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of Kesakanni tee L1 in Veibri village, Luunja municipality

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307114
Value
€180,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 25, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Reconstruction of Kesakanni tee L1 in Veibri village, Luunja municipality100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€180,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the tender is the reconstruction of Kesakanni tee L1 in Veibri village, Luunja municipality, in accordance with the construction project and the scope defined in the tender documents. The works will include the reconstruction of the existing roadway, the construction of a sidewalk, and a stormwater drainage system and related facilities.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the reconstruction of Kesakanni tee L1 is a price-driven opportunity. Success hinges on submitting the lowest compliant bid while meticulously addressing all mandatory and eligibility requirements. Focus on cost optimization and efficient execution to secure the contract.

Key Winning Messages

The most cost-effective and compliant solution for Kesakanni tee L1 reconstruction.

Guaranteed adherence to technical specifications and contract terms at the lowest possible price.

Key Opportunities
Price-driven evaluation allows for significant competitive advantage through aggressive pricing.
Streamlined tender process with clear technical and contractual requirements simplifies bid preparation.
Focus on mandatory exclusion grounds and subcontractor vetting presents an opportunity to differentiate through robust compliance.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the sole evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures, and optimize resource allocation to present the most aggressive yet sustainable price.

Ensuring full compliance with all electronic submission requirements and document formats.

Dedicate resources to meticulously follow all submission instructions, including file formats (.xml for ESPD) and platform usage (eRHR), and conduct pre-submission checks.

Thorough vetting of subcontractors to meet fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking checks.

Develop a standardized subcontractor vetting process that includes due diligence and documentation to satisfy the contracting authority's requirements.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized construction company with proven experience in road construction and infrastructure projects of similar scale, possessing strong cost control capabilities and a streamlined operational model. They should be adept at navigating electronic procurement systems and have robust processes for subcontractor vetting.
Key Requirements
Submission of Hankepass and ESPD electronically
Compliance with Technical Specifications (Lisa 1)
Adherence to Construction Contract Project terms (Lisa 2)
Accurate completion of Mahutabel (Vorm 1)
Lowest price bid
Subcontractor background checks for fraud, money laundering, human trafficking
Key Discriminators
Demonstrably the lowest compliant bid.
Exceptional clarity and completeness in the Mahutabel (Vorm 1), showcasing detailed cost breakdown and efficiency.
Proactive and transparent evidence of subcontractor vetting processes.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on commitment to local employment or responsible waste management during project execution, framed as operational efficiency rather than a formal social value commitment.
Bid Focus Areas
Reconstruction of Kesakanni tee L1 in Veibri village, Luunja municipality100.0%

Achieve the maximum score by submitting the absolute lowest compliant bid. This requires meticulous cost estimation, efficient project planning, and potentially accepting lower profit margins.

Recommendations6
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weight on price, develop a highly competitive pricing strategy. Conduct detailed costings, identify all potential efficiencies, and consider a lean profit margin to secure the lowest bid.

Directly impacts winning the tender.
Meticulous ESPD and Hankepass Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass and ESPD are completed accurately and in the correct .xml format. Any errors or omissions here can lead to exclusion.

Ensures bid eligibility.
Accurate Mahutabel (Vorm 1) Submission
CriticalMed effort

Complete the 'Vorm 1- Mahutabel (kululoend).xlsx' with utmost precision, ensuring it aligns with the technical specifications and your proposed pricing. This document is crucial for demonstrating understanding of work volumes and costs.

Demonstrates understanding and supports pricing.
Robust Subcontractor Vetting Process
HighMed effort

Establish and document a clear process for vetting subcontractors against fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking. Be prepared to provide evidence of this process.

Avoids exclusion due to subcontractor issues.
Thorough Review of Technical and Contractual Documents
HighMed effort

Conduct a detailed review of 'Lisa 1- Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf' and 'Lisa 2- Töövõtulepingu projekt.docx' to fully understand the scope, quality requirements, and contractual obligations. This understanding is key to accurate costing and risk assessment.

Ensures compliant and profitable bid.
Pre-submission Compliance Check
MediumLow effort

Perform a comprehensive pre-submission check of all required documents, formats, and electronic submission procedures to avoid last-minute errors.

Minimizes submission errors.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most economically advantageous offer, backed by a clear demonstration of technical capability and compliance. Emphasize efficiency and cost-effectiveness in all communications and documentation.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Bids must be submitted electronically via eRHR.
--Bids must be submitted in accordance with the conditions of the tender documents.
--Bidders must confirm qualifications and exclusion grounds using the Hankepass, which is completed electronically.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders will be excluded if they are involved in fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking, as verified by the contracting authority.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their qualifications and exclusion grounds using the Hankepass (preliminary confirmation).
--Bidders must submit the ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) electronically.
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney for joint bidders.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must comply with the technical specifications outlined in "Lisa 1- Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf".
--Bidders must adhere to the terms and requirements of the construction contract project outlined in "Lisa 2- Töövõtulepingu projekt.docx".
--Bidders must complete the "Vorm 1- Mahutabel (kululoend).xlsx" which details cost accounting and work volumes.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The sole evaluation criterion is the cost of the bid, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307114_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307114_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.8 KB

Tender documents include compliance conditions covering joint bidder power of attorney, trade secrets, subcontractor engagement rules, and bid submission requirements.

Vorm 1- MahutabelXLS
Vorm 1- Mahutabel (kululoend).xlsx -- 19.9 KB

This document is a quantity table detailing cost breakdown and work volumes for the Kesakanni tee L1 reconstruction project, which must be completed for tender submission.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307114_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender document outlines the evaluation criteria and methodology, where the bid price is the sole criterion and the lowest bid receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307114_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 71.7 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator serving as preliminary evidence of qualification and exclusion criteria set by the contracting authority, to be filled electronically.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument.docx -- 30.9 KB

Luunja Municipality is conducting an open tender for the reconstruction of Kesakanni road in Veibri village, with bids to be submitted electronically via eRHR in accordance with the tender document conditions.

Lisa 1- Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1- Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 159.2 KB

This technical specification defines the scope of reconstruction works for Kesakanni road, requirements for materials, quality, and execution of works in Luunja municipality.

Lisa 2- Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2- Töövõtulepingu projekt.docx -- 50.6 KB

This document is a draft of the works contract, outlining the terms and requirements for the reconstruction of Kesakanni road.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear technical and submission requirements. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on a single price-based evaluation criterion.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The procedure type 'E' (Open Procedure) and status '11' (Open) are standard.

Clarity80/100

The description of the reconstruction works is clear, detailing the scope of road, sidewalk, and drainage system improvements. Key documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are referenced, providing a good understanding of requirements. The evaluation criteria are explicitly stated.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' without further detail could be more transparent. While essential documents are mentioned, the actual attachment of all documents for full review is not explicitly confirmed.

Value Classified: Yes without further detail.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price), and all documents are accessible. The exclusion grounds are standard and applied universally, not tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission via eRHR is a practical approach. The contract start date is specified. However, information regarding financing sources is not explicitly provided, which could be a practical consideration for bidders.

Financing information not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistently populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear technical and scope description.
Mandatory use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Well-defined exclusion and eligibility requirements.
Logical and consistent timeline.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Reliance solely on price as the evaluation criterion.
Limited detail on 'Value Classified: Yes'.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the evaluation.
2. Consider adding qualitative aspects to the evaluation beyond just the lowest price to ensure best value.
3. Provide more transparency regarding the 'Value Classified' status.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline