Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Restoration of natural water regime in Pihla-Kaibaldi Nature Reserve

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307069
Value
€50,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 06, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 24, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The aim of the procurement is to create conditions for the restoration of the natural water regime in the Pihla-Kaibaldi Nature Reserve. The basis for carrying out the work is the "Construction project for the restoration of the natural water regime in the Pihla-Kaibaldi Nature Reserve" (Work No. 24/5040) prepared by OÜ Inseneribüroo STEIGER.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on ecological restoration with a clear technical scope and a price-driven evaluation. Success hinges on meticulous adherence to the construction project, competitive pricing, and demonstrating robust technical capability within the specified constraints, particularly the non-use of subcontractors.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-effective and compliant execution of natural water regime restoration.

Proven ability to deliver specialized ecological restoration works without subcontracting.

Commitment to preserving the natural integrity of Pihla-Kaibaldi Nature Reserve.

Key Opportunities
Price-driven evaluation allows for significant advantage with a competitive bid.
Clear technical scope defined by the construction project simplifies bid preparation and reduces ambiguity.
The 'Hankepass' requirement is a standardized process for demonstrating eligibility, allowing for efficient submission if prepared correctly.
Key Challenges
The strict requirement of no subcontractors could limit the pool of eligible bidders or require significant internal resource allocation.

Ensure internal capacity and resource planning are robust enough to cover all aspects of the project without external support. Clearly articulate this capability in the bid.

Potential for underestimation of costs due to the nature of restoration work and the specific constraints of a nature reserve.

Conduct thorough site-specific risk assessments and cost estimations based on the provided construction project, factoring in potential unforeseen challenges in a protected area. Build in a small contingency if possible within the price offer.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with proven experience in small-scale civil engineering, land reclamation, or environmental restoration works. The ideal bidder will have a strong understanding of nature reserve environments, possess the necessary equipment and skilled personnel to execute the defined tasks independently, and be highly cost-conscious.
Key Requirements
Completed price offer form
Adherence to the construction project (Töö nr 24/5040)
Confirmation of non-involvement of subcontractors
Completion of 'Hankepass' (tender pass) electronically
Adherence to personal protective equipment (PPE) rules in draft contract
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in similar ecological restoration projects within protected areas.
A highly detailed and cost-optimized work plan that clearly aligns with the construction project.
Proactive identification and mitigation of potential environmental impacts during the execution phase.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a statement on local employment or training opportunities if feasible, framed as a benefit of efficient, in-house execution.
Bid Focus Areas
PriceMaximum points for lowest price

Conduct a detailed cost breakdown based on the construction project. Aim for the lowest possible price that still allows for profitable execution, considering the no-subcontractor rule. Benchmark against similar small-scale restoration projects if possible.

Technical ComplianceN/A (implied)

Thoroughly review and understand the construction project (Töö nr 24/5040) and the draft contract. Ensure the proposed methodology, equipment, and personnel directly address all technical requirements. Highlight adherence to PPE regulations.

Eligibility and DocumentationN/A (pass/fail)

Complete the 'Hankepass' accurately and promptly. Ensure all mandatory fields are filled and supporting documents are readily available. Double-check the power of attorney requirement for joint bidders.

Recommendations6
Meticulous Price Offer Formulation
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a highly detailed and accurate price offer, ensuring it is the lowest possible while remaining profitable. This is the primary evaluation criterion.

Directly influences the scoring and likelihood of winning.
Comprehensive Construction Project Analysis
CriticalHigh effort

Deeply understand and align the bid with the 'Pihla-Kaibaldi looduskaitsealal loodusliku veerežiimi taastamistööde ehitusprojekt' (Töö nr 24/5040). All proposed methods and resources must directly map to this project.

Ensures technical compliance and avoids disqualification.
Confirm and Demonstrate In-House Capacity
CriticalMed effort

Explicitly confirm the non-involvement of subcontractors and be prepared to demonstrate the company's own capacity to execute all required works, including specialized tasks.

Avoids disqualification and builds confidence in delivery.
Streamlined Hankepass Submission
HighMed effort

Complete the 'Hankepass' (ESPD) accurately and electronically well in advance of the deadline to avoid last-minute issues.

Ensures eligibility and avoids technical submission errors.
Review Draft Contract for PPE and Other Obligations
HighMed effort

Thoroughly review the draft contract, paying close attention to the rules for personal protective equipment (PPE) and any other operational requirements. Ensure these are factored into the pricing and methodology.

Ensures full compliance with contractual obligations.
Highlight Relevant Experience
MediumLow effort

If the bidder has prior experience in similar ecological restoration or nature reserve projects, highlight this in the bid narrative or supporting documents, even if not a formal evaluation criterion.

Builds credibility and trust with the contracting authority.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution that fully meets the technical requirements without the added complexity or cost of subcontractors. Emphasize reliability and direct control over project execution.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must fill out the price offer form.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
--Business secrets must be marked and justified.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must be able to provide a completed price offer form.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
--Bidders must confirm that subcontractors will not be engaged.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for restoration works of natural water regime in Pihla-Kaibaldi nature reserve.
--Works include clearing routes, building dams, and filling ditches according to the provided construction project.
--Bidders must adhere to the rules for the use of personal protective equipment as defined in the draft contract.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total cost of the bid will be the primary evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.
--The estimated value of the tender is 50,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307069_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 41.1 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds for fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307069_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.6 KB

The contracting authority Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus requires bidders to complete a price offer form, submit a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable, declare and justify trade secrets, and confirm the non-involvement of subcontractors, all as part of the tender documents.

Lisa 1- Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Pihla_Kaibaldi_hinnapakkumuse vorm.xlsx -- 19.6 KB

Bidders must submit a price quotation form detailing costs for restoring the natural water regime in Pihla-Kaibaldi Nature Reserve.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307069_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

The tender evaluation criteria primarily focus on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307069_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.4 KB

The procurement pass is an initial confirmation of the company's qualifications and compliance with tender conditions, to be filled out electronically.

Lepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu vorm.docx -- 66.8 KB

This draft contract project defines the tender conditions, technical specifications, and requirements for the contractor, including regulations on the use of personal protective equipment.

HankedokumentDOC
HD.docx -- 56.6 KB

The tender document outlines the conditions for submitting a bid for natural water regime restoration works in Pihla-Kaibaldi Nature Reserve, with all tender basis documents being mandatory for the bidder.

Lepingu lisa 3 – Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Pihla_Kaibaldi veereziimi taastamistööde tehn... -- 46.1 KB

The contracting authority seeks a contractor to perform natural water regime restoration works in Pihla-Kaibaldi nature reserve, including clearing routes, building dams, and filling ditches according to the provided construction project.

Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitusDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri ja kinnitus.doc -- 34.5 KB

The joint bidders' authorization and confirmation is a required document proving the right of joint bidder members to represent and act jointly in the procurement procedure.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for nature restoration works in Pihla-Kaibaldi Nature Reserve is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it could benefit from more explicit sustainability considerations and improved accessibility of certain technical documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's scope. The mention of 'Green Procurement' and 'EU Funded' suggests adherence to relevant regulations.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the reference to a specific construction project provides a solid basis. Requirements are generally documented, and the primary evaluation criterion (total cost) is specified. However, the full technical specifications are not directly accessible for AI analysis, which slightly impacts overall clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration type, and contract start date. However, the full technical specifications and the draft contract are not directly accessible for AI analysis, which limits a complete assessment of all mandatory documents. The number of attached documents is stated, but their full content is not always summarized.

Full content of technical specifications and draft contract not directly accessible for AI analysis.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is generally provided, although some technical documents are not directly parsable by AI.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are supported. The contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is defined as 'PERIOD' without a specific end date, which could be more precise. The accessibility of some technical documents in non-AI-readable formats also impacts practicality.

Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Duration defined as 'PERIOD' without a specific end date.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly mentions 'Green Procurement' and 'EU Funded', indicating a focus on sustainability. However, specific social aspects or innovation criteria are not detailed in the provided text, limiting the score in this category.

Lack of explicit details on social aspects or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear description of works and reference to construction project.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
E-submission and e-procurement enabled.
Good data consistency and logical date sequencing.

Concerns

Limited accessibility of full technical specifications and draft contract for AI analysis.
Lack of explicit details on financing and precise contract duration.
Absence of detailed social or innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all technical documents are provided in AI-readable formats or with comprehensive summaries.
2. Provide more specific details on contract duration and financing.
3. Elaborate on specific social and innovation aspects within the sustainability criteria.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline