Skip to main content
Tenders

Respiratory system and sensory organ medications

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307065
Value
€44,042
Location
Estonia
Published
March 12, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Tender Opening

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€44,042
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€92,792
Avg. Bids
2.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
3,220 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Sale of compliant medications based on orders and transport of ordered goods to Viljandi Hospital (including loading works upon delivery of goods).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must follow instructions and requirements for participating in the tender for respiratory system and sensory organ medicines.
--Bidders must submit an offer that includes the draft framework agreement terms.
--Bidders must submit an offer that adheres to the technical specifications.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not involve subcontractors or suppliers subject to sanctions in the performance of the contract.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide confirmation as an initial proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties.
--Bidders must adhere to the conditions and expected response formats set by the contracting authority.
--Bidders must provide information regarding trade secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must adhere to specified delivery conditions to the logistics terminal, including vehicle dimensions and working hours.
--Bidders must be able to provide respiratory system and sensory organ medicines.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score in the evaluation.
--Tender includes transport and loading costs in the evaluation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307065_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 329.7 KB

The bidder must confirm that no sanctioned subcontractors or suppliers will be involved in the contract execution and provide information regarding trade secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307065_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 64.9 KB

The tender evaluation criteria primarily focus on the bid price, where the lowest price receives the maximum score, and also include costs for transportation and loading.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307065_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.8 KB

The Procurement Passport (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Lepingu lisa 1. Tarne logistilised tingimusedDOC
Lepingu lisa 1 Tarne logistilised tingimused.... -- 615.6 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to deliver goods to the logistics terminal under specified conditions, including vehicle dimensions and working hours, and offers an on-site visit opportunity.

Lisa 2. Raamlepingu kavandDOC
Lisa 2 Raamlepingu kavand.doc -- 66.0 KB

This document contains a draft framework agreement, which is an essential part of understanding the terms of the procurement contract for respiratory and sensory organ medications.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanekDOC
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek.doc -- 59.5 KB

This proposal for submitting an offer contains instructions and requirements for participating in the tender for respiratory and sensory organ medications.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for respiratory and sensory organ medicines is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a straightforward evaluation focused on price. However, it lacks explicit details on contract duration and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. The absence of disputes and a clear status code contribute positively. However, the lack of explicit contract duration information slightly impacts this score.

Clarity80/100

The description of the goods and services is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of expectations. Key documents like the 'Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek' and the draft framework agreement are available, contributing to clarity. The main area for improvement is the explicit statement of evaluation criteria beyond price.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, deadlines, and organization details. However, the contract duration is not explicitly specified, and some technical documents are in unsupported formats, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-submission and e-procurement. The value is disclosed, and the primary evaluation criterion being the lowest price is objective. The requirement for bidders to provide confirmation instead of certificates is a common and fair practice. No specific company tailoring was identified.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. The opening place is clearly indicated. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent, which could be improved.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated consistently. The tender status is clear, and there are no reported disputes. The dates provided are logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which limits the score in this category.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of goods and services
E-submission and e-procurement enabled
Objective primary evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Availability of key tender documents (draft agreement, submission proposal)

Concerns

Missing explicit contract duration
Lack of sustainability and innovation criteria
Some technical documents in unsupported formats

Recommendations

1. Specify the contract duration clearly.
2. Incorporate sustainability and innovation criteria into the evaluation.
3. Ensure all technical documents are provided in universally accessible formats.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline