Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of Acoustic Resonance Mixer

Open
Deadline
12 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307031
Value
€90,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 09, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Tender price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Tender Opening

April 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€90,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€80,024
Avg. Bids
1.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
518 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of Acoustic Resonance Mixer
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

75%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for an acoustic resonance mixer is a price-driven opportunity with a clear 100% weighting on cost. Success hinges on delivering the lowest comprehensive price, encompassing the mixer, delivery, installation, and training. While social and innovative aspects are absent, a strong technical proposal demonstrating value for money will be crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: The most cost-effective solution for your acoustic resonance mixer needs, delivered and supported seamlessly.

Proven Performance, Priced Right: Reliable acoustic resonance mixer technology at the lowest total cost of ownership.

Key Opportunities
Dominant focus on price allows for a clear competitive advantage if cost efficiencies can be leveraged.
Short contract duration (4 months) suggests a need for readily available or quickly deployable solutions.
The tender is not divided into lots, simplifying the bidding process and focusing on a single, comprehensive offer.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% price weighting.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Explore bulk purchasing, optimized logistics, and efficient installation processes. Consider offering tiered pricing or value-added services that don't significantly increase the base price but enhance perceived value.

Ensuring the technical description meets the contracting authority's implicit needs, even without explicit detailed specifications provided in the AI summary.

Thoroughly review 'Hanke alusdokumendid ENG' and 'Hanke alusdokumendid' for any technical specifications or performance requirements. If ambiguities exist, proactively submit clarification questions to the contracting authority well before the deadline.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A supplier with a proven track record in providing acoustic resonance mixers, capable of offering a highly competitive price point. They should possess efficient supply chain and logistics capabilities for timely delivery and installation, and robust training resources to ensure user proficiency. Experience with Tallinn University of Technology or similar academic institutions would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Lowest comprehensive bid price (mixer, delivery, installation, training)
Technical description of the acoustic resonance mixer
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds (no sanctions)
Electronic submission of bid via Hankepass
Declaration of compliance with contracting authority conditions
Key Discriminators
The lowest all-inclusive price for the acoustic resonance mixer, delivery, installation, and training.
A technically sound and well-documented acoustic resonance mixer that demonstrably meets the functional requirements.
A streamlined and efficient delivery and installation process, minimizing disruption for the university.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, consider a brief mention of commitment to ethical sourcing or sustainable operational practices within the technical description, if it aligns with your company's ethos and can be achieved without cost increase.
Bid Focus Areas
Tender price100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price for the acoustic resonance mixer, including all associated costs (delivery, installation, training). This requires meticulous cost breakdown and optimization across the entire supply chain and service delivery.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for Lowest Cost
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% price weighting, the primary focus must be on submitting the absolute lowest comprehensive bid. This involves detailed cost analysis of the mixer, shipping, installation, and training, identifying all possible efficiencies.

Directly maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion.
Thoroughly Review All Tender Documents
CriticalMed effort

Access and meticulously review 'Hanke alusdokumendid ENG' and 'Hanke alusdokumendid' for any technical specifications, performance requirements, or contractual clauses not captured in the AI summary. Pay close attention to any implicit requirements for the acoustic resonance mixer.

Ensures full compliance and avoids disqualification.
Submit Clarification Questions Early
HighLow effort

If any aspect of the technical requirements or the scope of 'delivery, installation, and training' is unclear after reviewing the documents, submit formal clarification questions to the contracting authority well in advance of the deadline.

Reduces risk of misinterpretation and ensures a compliant, competitive bid.
Accurate Hankepass Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Hankepass is filled out electronically and accurately, confirming compliance with all eligibility and exclusion grounds. This is a mandatory pre-qualification step.

Essential for bid eligibility.
Highlight Efficient Delivery and Installation
MediumLow effort

Even with a price focus, a clear and concise technical description that emphasizes the efficiency and minimal disruption of your delivery and installation process can add perceived value and confidence to the bid.

Builds confidence in execution, potentially influencing subjective judgment if minor price differences exist.
Verify Sanctions Compliance
HighMed effort

Conduct thorough due diligence to ensure the bidding entity and any key subcontractors are not subject to any sanctions imposed by national or international bodies.

Prevents mandatory exclusion.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the provider offering the most comprehensive and lowest-cost solution, emphasizing the 'all-inclusive' nature of the bid price. Highlight operational efficiency and reliability to build trust despite the price-centric evaluation.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--Bidders must mark any business secrets.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-16 11:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide a declaration of compliance with conditions set by the contracting authority.
--Bidders must electronically fill out the Hankepass (initial confirmation of compliance).
--If applicable, joint bidders must provide a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a technical description of the acoustic resonance mixer.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total value of the tender is 90000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307031_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.8 KB

The bidder must submit a technical description, confirm compliance with sanctions, and provide a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable, while also identifying trade secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307031_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307031_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 62.9 KB

The procurement pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof of meeting the contracting authority's conditions, but it is filled out electronically, not directly.

Hanke alusdokumendidDOC
307031 Hanke alusdokumendid.docx -- 53.9 KB

This document contains the tender notice, technical specifications, draft contract, and other foundational documents necessary for participating in the public procurement for the purchase of an acoustic resonance mixer.

Hanke alusdokumendid ENGDOC
307031 Hanke alusdokumendid ENG.docx -- 79.7 KB

Tallinn University of Technology invites participation in a procurement for an acoustic resonance mixer, requiring tender submission in accordance with the procurement documents.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an acoustic resonance mixer is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on electronic submission, which might pose challenges for some bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The procedure is standard for this type of procurement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the item to be procured is concise. Requirements are documented, and the evaluation criteria are specified, although the sole reliance on price could be considered a simplification.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the full tender documents are not directly accessible for analysis, only summaries are provided, which impacts the completeness score.

Full tender documents not directly accessible for analysis.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to electronic submission and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is disclosed, and criteria are objective (lowest price). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandatory, which is a standard practice. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value. The contract duration is specified.

Financing details beyond estimated value are not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no noted suspensions or disputes, and the timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' and 'E-Procurement' as characteristics. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation-focused aspects.

Strengths

Clear and concise title and description.
Well-defined timeline with reasonable deadlines.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).

Concerns

Limited information on sustainability aspects.
Full tender documents not directly accessible for detailed review.
Sole reliance on price as an evaluation criterion.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, material sourcing) into future tenders.
2. Ensure all relevant tender documents are readily accessible for potential bidders.
3. Explore incorporating qualitative evaluation criteria alongside price for a more comprehensive assessment.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline