Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of Acoustic Resonance Mixer

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307031
Value
€90,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 09, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Tender price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Tender Opening

April 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€90,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€80,024
Avg. Bids
1.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
518 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of Acoustic Resonance Mixer
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted electronically.
--Bidders must mark any business secrets.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-16 11:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide a declaration of compliance with conditions set by the contracting authority.
--Bidders must electronically fill out the Hankepass (initial confirmation of compliance).
--If applicable, joint bidders must provide a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit a technical description of the acoustic resonance mixer.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total value of the tender is 90000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307031_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.8 KB

The bidder must submit a technical description, confirm compliance with sanctions, and provide a power of attorney for joint bidders if applicable, while also identifying trade secrets.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307031_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307031_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 62.9 KB

The procurement pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof of meeting the contracting authority's conditions, but it is filled out electronically, not directly.

Hanke alusdokumendidDOC
307031 Hanke alusdokumendid.docx -- 53.9 KB

This document contains the tender notice, technical specifications, draft contract, and other foundational documents necessary for participating in the public procurement for the purchase of an acoustic resonance mixer.

Hanke alusdokumendid ENGDOC
307031 Hanke alusdokumendid ENG.docx -- 79.7 KB

Tallinn University of Technology invites participation in a procurement for an acoustic resonance mixer, requiring tender submission in accordance with the procurement documents.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an acoustic resonance mixer is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on electronic submission, which might pose challenges for some bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The procedure is standard for this type of procurement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the item to be procured is concise. Requirements are documented, and the evaluation criteria are specified, although the sole reliance on price could be considered a simplification.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the full tender documents are not directly accessible for analysis, only summaries are provided, which impacts the completeness score.

Full tender documents not directly accessible for analysis.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to electronic submission and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is disclosed, and criteria are objective (lowest price). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandatory, which is a standard practice. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value. The contract duration is specified.

Financing details beyond estimated value are not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no noted suspensions or disputes, and the timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' and 'E-Procurement' as characteristics. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation-focused aspects.

Strengths

Clear and concise title and description.
Well-defined timeline with reasonable deadlines.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).

Concerns

Limited information on sustainability aspects.
Full tender documents not directly accessible for detailed review.
Sole reliance on price as an evaluation criterion.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, material sourcing) into future tenders.
2. Ensure all relevant tender documents are readily accessible for potential bidders.
3. Explore incorporating qualitative evaluation criteria alongside price for a more comprehensive assessment.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline