Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of Ermi Street, Phase I

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307018
Value
€685,400
Location
Estonia
Published
March 05, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€685,400
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of Ermi Street, Phase I in Raadi village, Tartu municipality, in accordance with the main project prepared by Tinter-Projekt OÜ and the public procurement documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Ermi street construction is heavily weighted on price, making cost leadership a primary win theme. Bidders must meticulously adhere to all submission requirements and demonstrate technical capability to execute the project as per the main project and technical description. Leveraging a lean operational model and efficient project planning will be crucial for competitive pricing.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Price for Quality Construction

Proven Expertise in Municipal Road Infrastructure

Key Opportunities
Exploiting the 100% price weighting by optimizing cost calculations.
Demonstrating a deep understanding of the technical specifications to ensure a compliant and efficient build.
Leveraging internal efficiencies to offer a highly competitive bid without compromising quality.
Key Challenges
The extreme weighting of bid price (100%) creates intense pressure to submit the lowest possible offer, potentially impacting profit margins.

Conduct thorough cost analysis, identify all potential cost-saving measures without compromising quality or compliance, and explore economies of scale if applicable. Focus on operational efficiency and lean project management.

Strict requirement of no subcontractors means the bidder must have all necessary resources and expertise in-house.

Ensure internal capacity assessment is comprehensive and accurate. If any gaps exist, consider temporary internal resource allocation or strategic hiring prior to bid submission.

The absence of specified duration for the contract might lead to uncertainty in long-term cost projections.

Base cost estimations on realistic project timelines derived from the technical description and main project, factoring in potential contingencies. Clearly state assumptions made regarding project duration in the bid where appropriate.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in road construction, particularly in municipal projects, possessing a highly efficient cost structure and a strong track record of timely project delivery. They should have robust internal processes for cost control and a clear understanding of the technical specifications provided.
Key Requirements
Adherence to the provided cost calculation form (Vorm 1 Kululoend 0503.xlsx)
Compliance with instructions in 'Juhis pakkujale Ermi tn.docx'
Submission in the format specified by the contracting authority (hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf)
Ability to carry out construction according to the technical description and main project
No subcontractors involved
Submission by the deadline: 2026-04-07 12:00:00
Key Discriminators
The lowest bid price will be the primary differentiator. Any bidder who can offer a demonstrably lower price while meeting all technical and eligibility requirements will have a significant advantage.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, consider incorporating a commitment to local employment or waste reduction initiatives in the bid narrative to subtly enhance the bidder's profile, even if not formally scored. For example, 'Commitment to utilizing local labor for a portion of the workforce to support the Tartu community.'
Bid Focus Areas
Bid price100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by meticulously analyzing all cost components in Vorm 1 Kululoend 0503.xlsx. Optimize material sourcing, labor allocation, and equipment utilization. Ensure all indirect costs are accurately accounted for but minimized. Benchmark against similar projects to ensure competitiveness.

Recommendations6
Meticulous Cost Calculation and Optimization
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly analyze and complete the provided cost calculation form (Vorm 1 Kululoend 0503.xlsx). Identify all opportunities for cost reduction without compromising quality or compliance. This is paramount given the 100% weighting of the bid price.

Directly impacts the bid's competitiveness and scoring.
Demonstrate Technical Compliance and Efficiency
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the bid clearly articulates how the bidder will meet all technical requirements outlined in the technical description and main project. Highlight internal capabilities and processes that ensure efficient execution and adherence to standards, even with a low price.

Ensures the bid is not disqualified on technical grounds and supports the price competitiveness.
Strict Adherence to Submission Guidelines
CriticalMed effort

Pay extreme attention to detail in following all instructions within 'Juhis pakkujale Ermi tn.docx' and the format specified in 'hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf'. Any deviation could lead to disqualification.

Prevents disqualification and ensures the bid is formally accepted.
Confirm In-House Capacity for No Subcontractors
CriticalLow effort

Explicitly confirm and be prepared to demonstrate that the bidder possesses all the necessary resources, equipment, and expertise to complete the entire project without engaging subcontractors. This is a mandatory exclusion ground.

Avoids disqualification.
Early Submission of Bid
HighLow effort

Submit the bid well before the deadline (2026-04-07 12:00:00) to allow for last-minute checks and to avoid any technical issues with the submission portal.

Minimizes risk of technical submission failure.
Subtle Social Value Integration
LowLow effort

While social value is not a formal evaluation criterion, subtly weave in commitments to local employment or sustainable practices in the narrative sections of the bid to present a more responsible bidder, if opportunities arise within the submission documents.

May offer a slight perception advantage, though not directly scored.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as offering the most cost-effective solution for high-quality road construction, emphasizing efficiency and proven execution capabilities. Highlight the absence of subcontractor markups as a direct benefit to the contracting authority, translating into a lower final price.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a bid using the provided cost calculation form (Vorm 1 Kululoend 0503.xlsx).
--Bidders must adhere to the instructions provided in the "Juhis pakkujale Ermi tn.docx" document.
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-07 12:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders will be excluded if they have been convicted of fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their compliance with the conditions set by the contracting authority.
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney for joint bids.
--Bidders must declare any business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be able to carry out the construction of Ermi street, stage I, according to the technical description and main project.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit their bid price in the prescribed format.
--The bid price will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307018_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing in the first round.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307018_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.4 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to comply with the conditions, including power of attorney for joint bids, clarification of trade secrets, non-involvement of subcontractors, and submission of bid costs in the prescribed format.

KululoendXLS
Vorm 1 Kululoend 0503.xlsx -- 39.6 KB

The contracting authority provides a cost breakdown form, including technical specifications for road works and general costs, for bidders to submit their proposals.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307018_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for bid cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307018_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.1 KB

The procurement pass is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, containing conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.

Alusdokument - juhis pakkujaleDOC
Juhis pakkujale Ermi tn.docx -- 45.5 KB

This document guides bidders on submitting proposals for the first phase of Ermi street construction tender, clarifying conditions and submission procedures.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_Ermi tn.docx -- 542.2 KB

The contracting authority is seeking bids for the construction of the first phase of Ermi street, in accordance with the provided technical description and main project.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt Ermi tn.docx -- 68.8 KB

This document is a draft construction contract outlining the terms, objectives, and penalty clauses for the first phase of Ermi street construction.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of Ermi street, stage I, in Tartu municipality is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. Key documents are provided, and the evaluation is primarily based on price. Sustainability aspects are present but could be more prominent.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations. The CPV code is appropriate, and the procedure type is clear. No immediate legal red flags or disputes are noted. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope of work.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, referencing specific project documentation. Requirements are documented in various attached files, and evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with price being the main factor. Conditions for participation are also outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like technical specifications, evaluation criteria, and submission forms are attached. However, the absence of a specific contract start date in the 'TIMELINE' section (though implied by 'Contract Start') could be a minor point.

Fairness85/100

The tender allows for electronic submission and e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The evaluation criteria are objective, focusing on price. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied through the provided links and attachments.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates electronic submission and e-procurement, which is practical. A contract start date is provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is specified as 'PERIOD' with a tender validity of 3 months, which is standard but could be more precise regarding the contract duration itself.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates provided are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, indicating some consideration for environmental aspects. However, specific social criteria or innovation focus are not explicitly detailed in the provided information. The funding source (EU funded) is not specified.

Strengths

Clear technical description and project references
Mandatory electronic submission and e-procurement
Objective evaluation criteria (price-based)
Reasonable timeline and contract start date

Concerns

Limited explicit detail on social or innovation aspects of sustainability
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Contract duration could be more precisely defined beyond 'PERIOD'

Recommendations

1. Elaborate on specific green procurement targets or social value considerations.
2. Provide more explicit details on contract duration and financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline