Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of Ermi Street, Phase I

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
307018
Value
€685,400
Location
Estonia
Published
March 05, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Bid price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€685,400
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of Ermi Street, Phase I, in Raadi village, Tartu municipality, in accordance with the main project prepared by Tinter-Projekt OÜ and the tender documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a bid using the provided cost calculation form (Vorm 1 Kululoend 0503.xlsx).
--Bidders must adhere to the instructions provided in the "Juhis pakkujale Ermi tn.docx" document.
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-07 12:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders will be excluded if they have been convicted of fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm their compliance with the conditions set by the contracting authority.
--Bidders must provide a power of attorney for joint bids.
--Bidders must declare any business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be able to carry out the construction of Ermi street, stage I, according to the technical description and main project.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit their bid price in the prescribed format.
--The bid price will be evaluated, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
307018_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing in the first round.

VastavustingimusedPDF
307018_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.4 KB

The contracting authority requires bidders to comply with the conditions, including power of attorney for joint bids, clarification of trade secrets, non-involvement of subcontractors, and submission of bid costs in the prescribed format.

KululoendXLS
Vorm 1 Kululoend 0503.xlsx -- 39.6 KB

The contracting authority provides a cost breakdown form, including technical specifications for road works and general costs, for bidders to submit their proposals.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307018_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for bid cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307018_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 67.1 KB

The procurement pass is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, containing conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.

Alusdokument - juhis pakkujaleDOC
Juhis pakkujale Ermi tn.docx -- 45.5 KB

This document guides bidders on submitting proposals for the first phase of Ermi street construction tender, clarifying conditions and submission procedures.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_Ermi tn.docx -- 542.2 KB

The contracting authority is seeking bids for the construction of the first phase of Ermi street, in accordance with the provided technical description and main project.

Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 2 Hankelepingu projekt Ermi tn.docx -- 68.8 KB

This document is a draft construction contract outlining the terms, objectives, and penalty clauses for the first phase of Ermi street construction.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of Ermi street, stage I, in Tartu municipality is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. Key documents are provided, and the evaluation is primarily based on price. Sustainability aspects are present but could be more prominent.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations. The CPV code is appropriate, and the procedure type is clear. No immediate legal red flags or disputes are noted. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope of work.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, referencing specific project documentation. Requirements are documented in various attached files, and evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with price being the main factor. Conditions for participation are also outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like technical specifications, evaluation criteria, and submission forms are attached. However, the absence of a specific contract start date in the 'TIMELINE' section (though implied by 'Contract Start') could be a minor point.

Fairness85/100

The tender allows for electronic submission and e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The evaluation criteria are objective, focusing on price. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied through the provided links and attachments.

Practicality65/100

The tender mandates electronic submission and e-procurement, which is practical. A contract start date is provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is specified as 'PERIOD' with a tender validity of 3 months, which is standard but could be more precise regarding the contract duration itself.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates provided are logical and sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender includes 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, indicating some consideration for environmental aspects. However, specific social criteria or innovation focus are not explicitly detailed in the provided information. The funding source (EU funded) is not specified.

Strengths

Clear technical description and project references
Mandatory electronic submission and e-procurement
Objective evaluation criteria (price-based)
Reasonable timeline and contract start date

Concerns

Limited explicit detail on social or innovation aspects of sustainability
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Contract duration could be more precisely defined beyond 'PERIOD'

Recommendations

1. Elaborate on specific green procurement targets or social value considerations.
2. Provide more explicit details on contract duration and financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline