Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of an inverted microscope for the BSL2 laboratory of the Institute of Pharmacy

Open
Deadline
2 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
307013
Value
€26,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 05, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€26,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€80,024
Avg. Bids
1.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
518 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of this procurement procedure is the purchase of an inverted microscope with epifluorescence and bright-field phase contrast, with an integrated camera and monitor, for the BSL2 laboratory of the Institute of Pharmacy, in accordance with the technical specification provided in Annex 1 to the HD. The handover deadline for the equipment is no later than 3 (three) months from the conclusion of the procurement contract. The start time of the contract conclusion indicated in the procurement notice is an assumption and is not legally binding.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender is a straightforward procurement of a single inverted microscope with a strong emphasis on price. The winning strategy will revolve around offering the most competitive price while ensuring full compliance with all technical and administrative requirements. Differentiation will be minimal, making cost leadership the primary driver of success.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Price for Essential Laboratory Equipment

Guaranteed Compliance and Swift Delivery for BSL2 Operations

Key Opportunities
Sole evaluation criterion is price, allowing for a clear focus on cost optimization.
The 'or equivalent' clause provides flexibility in product selection, potentially enabling the use of more cost-effective components or models.
The relatively low estimated value suggests a market where established suppliers might not be aggressively competing, creating an opening for a well-priced offer.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the 100% cost evaluation.

Focus on lean operations, bulk purchasing power, and minimizing profit margins to achieve the lowest possible price. Explore all avenues for cost reduction without compromising essential functionality.

Ensuring absolute compliance with all technical specifications, especially the 'data saving without a computer' feature, to avoid disqualification.

Thoroughly vet the proposed microscope model against the technical specification (Lisa 1). Obtain explicit confirmation from the manufacturer regarding the data saving functionality. Include detailed technical documentation in the bid.

The short delivery timeline of 3 months requires a well-established supply chain and efficient logistics.

Confirm immediate availability of the proposed model and its components. Have a clear plan for expedited shipping and customs clearance if necessary. Secure commitment from the manufacturer for timely delivery.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A supplier with a strong existing relationship with microscope manufacturers, capable of offering a high-quality, compliant product at a highly competitive price. They should have efficient internal processes to ensure timely delivery and minimal administrative overhead, allowing for aggressive pricing.
Key Requirements
Inverted microscope with epifluorescence and phase contrast, integrated camera and monitor.
Data saving without a computer.
New device meeting all technical specifications.
Delivery within 3 months of contract signing.
Offer validity for at least 3 months.
Submission of a valid power of attorney (if applicable).
Full agreement to tender conditions.
Key Discriminators
The absolute lowest price that still meets all technical requirements.
Demonstrated understanding and adherence to the BSL2 laboratory context, implying reliability and suitability for a sensitive environment.
Social Value Opportunities
As social value is explicitly excluded ('SOCIAL ASPECTS: No'), no specific commitments are required or expected. Focus solely on the core procurement requirements.
Bid Focus Areas
Total bid cost100.0%

Achieve the absolute lowest possible price by optimizing supply chain costs, minimizing overhead, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin. Ensure the price is presented clearly and comprehensively.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price for Lowest Cost
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% weightage on total bid cost, every effort must be made to submit the lowest possible price. This involves detailed cost analysis, exploring supplier discounts, and potentially accepting a lower profit margin. The bid must be demonstrably the most cost-effective.

Directly determines the maximum score and significantly increases the probability of winning.
Meticulously Verify Technical Compliance
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' and ensure the proposed microscope model, including the integrated camera and monitor, meets all specifications, especially the 'data saving without a computer' requirement. Provide detailed technical documentation to support compliance.

Prevents disqualification due to non-compliance, which is a fundamental requirement.
Confirm Product Availability and Delivery Timeline
CriticalMed effort

Secure confirmation from the manufacturer or supplier regarding the immediate availability of the proposed microscope model and its components. Establish a clear logistical plan to guarantee delivery within the 3-month timeframe. This includes understanding lead times, shipping, and customs.

Ensures adherence to a critical contractual obligation, avoiding penalties or contract termination.
Prepare Robust Power of Attorney Documentation
HighLow effort

If the bid is submitted by a representative, ensure a valid and correctly executed power of attorney is included, proving their authority to submit the bid and conclude contracts. This is a standard administrative requirement that can lead to disqualification if not met.

Avoids administrative disqualification.
Leverage 'Or Equivalent' for Cost Savings
MediumMed effort

While meeting all functional requirements, explore if 'or equivalent' clauses allow for the selection of components or models that offer similar performance but at a lower cost, without compromising quality or essential features. This should be clearly justified in the technical documentation.

Contributes to achieving the lowest possible price.
Ensure Offer Validity Period
CriticalLow effort

Confirm that the submitted offer remains valid for at least 3 months from the submission deadline. This is a mandatory requirement for bid acceptance.

Prevents disqualification due to an insufficient offer validity period.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution that fully meets the essential technical requirements for a BSL2 laboratory. Emphasize the value proposition of receiving a high-quality, compliant microscope at the lowest possible price, with guaranteed timely delivery.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

19 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--The tender is not divided into lots because the subject of the procurement contract is the purchase of a single, integral device that cannot be divided into parts.
--The tender process instructions document explains the basis documents, communication procedures, and bid formatting requirements.
--The draft contract outlines the terms of purchase, payment terms, deadlines, and handover procedure.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned, but general compliance with tender documents is implied.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidder must confirm they have reviewed and fully agree to the tender conditions.
--The offered device must be new and meet the requirements.
--The offer must be valid for at least 3 months.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender is for the purchase of an inverted microscope with epifluorescence and phase contrast, including a camera and monitor.
--The microscope must allow data saving without a computer.
--Any reference to standards or other bases in the procurement documents shall be read as supplemented by "or equivalent".
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 26000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated solely on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
307013_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.4 KB

The bidder must confirm they have reviewed and fully accept the tender conditions, that the offered equipment is new and compliant, and that the bid is valid for at least 3 months.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
307013_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids solely based on the total cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
307013_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.9 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the company, containing conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not a document intended for completion.

Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseksPDF
Juhised hankemenetluses osalemiseks.pdf -- 127.1 KB

This document outlines the tender base documents, communication procedures, and bid preparation requirements, serving as a crucial part of bid formulation.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 142.0 KB

The University of Tartu is seeking an inverted microscope with epifluorescence and phase contrast, including a camera and monitor, for its BSL2 laboratory, capable of data recording without a computer.

Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid)DOC
Lisa 2 - 3 (vormid).docx -- 30.8 KB

Bidders must submit a power of attorney that proves their representative's right to submit a bid and conclude contracts, especially for joint bidders.

Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavandPDF
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu kavand.pdf -- 258.8 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the terms, payment conditions, deadlines, and handover procedures for the purchase of a microscope.

Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek - nõuded pakkujale ja pakkumusele (26)PDF
Pakkumuse esitamise ettepanek - nõuded pakkuj... -- 171.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for submitting a bid in Tartu University's inverted microscope tender, including qualification and submission conditions.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an inverted microscope is generally well-structured with clear technical specifications and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could improve on the clarity of some procedural documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear timeline. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope of the procurement. No immediate regulatory compliance issues are flagged.

Clarity80/100

The technical description of the microscope is clear, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is explicitly stated. The requirement for 'or equivalent' for standards is a good practice for clarity. However, the distinction between 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' and other condition documents could be clearer.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like technical specifications and draft contract are referenced. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is not analyzed due to format, and the necessity of 'Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega' is unclear.

Fairness85/100

The evaluation is based on a single, objective criterion (lowest price), promoting fairness. The 'or equivalent' clause for standards enhances accessibility. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are positive. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is not explicitly provided, and the URL for opening place is generic.

Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The timeline is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' but lacks specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria, which are common in modern tenders.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price)
Use of e-procurement and e-submission
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' for standards

Concerns

Limited sustainability considerations
Potential ambiguity in some procedural documents
Lack of detailed financing information

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., energy efficiency, material sourcing).
2. Clarify the purpose and required action for all procedural documents.
3. Provide more detailed information on financing arrangements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline