Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Procurement of furnishings for Tiskre School in Tiskre village, Harku municipality

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
306988
Value
€440,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 12, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€440,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€72,774
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
884 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to furnish the facility located at Hariduse tee 1, 76916 Tiskre village, Harku municipality, Harjumaa, with furnishings that meet the functional needs of the school building and are in line with the interior design project concept.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for Tiskre School furnishings is heavily weighted towards cost, making aggressive pricing essential. However, compliance with sustainability (legally sourced wood, REACH) and technical requirements (functional needs, design compatibility, repairability) are critical to avoid disqualification and build trust. A winning bid will balance competitive pricing with demonstrable quality and responsible sourcing.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective Solutions with Uncompromised Quality and Sustainability

Reliable Partner for Educational Furnishing Needs

Key Opportunities
Leverage economies of scale or efficient production processes to offer highly competitive pricing.
Proactively demonstrate commitment to sustainability through clear documentation of legally sourced wood and REACH compliance.
Highlight the ease of repair and longevity of furniture to add value beyond initial cost, aligning with school operational efficiency.
Thoroughly analyze floor plans to propose furniture solutions that optimize space utilization and meet functional needs, demonstrating understanding.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to 100% cost evaluation.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality. Explore bulk purchasing of materials or optimized manufacturing processes. Consider offering tiered pricing for certain items if feasible within the lot structure.

Ensuring all mandatory documentation and declarations (wood sourcing, REACH, repair instructions) are meticulously prepared and compliant.

Establish a dedicated compliance team or assign responsibility to experienced personnel. Develop standardized templates for these declarations based on tender requirements. Conduct internal reviews before submission.

Interpreting and aligning furniture offerings with the unspecified interior design concept.

Request clarification from the contracting authority regarding the interior design concept if possible. If not, make reasonable assumptions based on typical school aesthetics and functional requirements, and clearly articulate these assumptions in the bid.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A furniture supplier with a strong track record in supplying educational institutions, capable of offering cost-effective solutions while adhering to strict environmental and technical specifications. The ideal bidder will have robust supply chain management for legally sourced wood and a clear understanding of REACH regulations, coupled with efficient manufacturing and installation capabilities.
Key Requirements
Detailed cost table with prices and descriptions for each offered product.
Evidence of legally sourced wood for furniture production.
Declaration of REACH candidate substances used in furniture.
Instructions for easy repair of furniture.
Furniture must meet the functional needs of Tiskre school and be compatible with the interior design concept.
Delivery and installation of furniture.
Warranty period for the furniture.
Completion of ESPD (v2.0) in XML format.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable commitment to sustainability beyond minimum requirements (e.g., certifications, lifecycle assessment data).
Innovative solutions for furniture repairability or modularity that offer long-term cost savings for the school.
Exceptional understanding of school furniture functionality and ergonomics, evidenced through detailed product specifications and proposed layouts.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to using furniture materials with a low environmental impact and high recyclability, even if not explicitly mandated beyond wood sourcing.
Explore options for local sourcing of materials or manufacturing where feasible to support the local economy, if this can be achieved without compromising cost-competitiveness.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost100.0%

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy by optimizing production costs, supply chain efficiencies, and potentially offering slight variations in product specifications that still meet functional needs but reduce material costs. Ensure the cost table is meticulously detailed and error-free.

Recommendations6
Aggressive Costing Strategy
CriticalHigh effort

Given the 100% cost weighting, a highly competitive pricing strategy is paramount. Analyze all cost components, including materials, manufacturing, logistics, and installation, to identify opportunities for optimization. Consider offering value-added services or slightly different product configurations that maintain quality and functionality but reduce overall cost.

Directly maximizes score in the sole evaluation criterion.
Meticulous Compliance Documentation
CriticalMed effort

Ensure absolute accuracy and completeness in all required documentation, particularly for legally sourced wood, REACH declarations, and repair instructions. Non-compliance in these areas will lead to disqualification. Develop clear, concise, and verifiable evidence for each requirement.

Prevents disqualification and builds trust with the contracting authority.
Demonstrate Functional and Design Alignment
HighMed effort

Thoroughly analyze the provided floor plans and any available information on the interior design concept. Clearly articulate how the proposed furniture meets the functional needs of a school environment and complements the aesthetic vision. Use the floor plans to propose space-efficient and practical layouts.

Enhances the perceived value of the bid beyond just price.
Detailed Cost Table Accuracy
HighMed effort

The 'Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel' (Offer Cost Table) must be completed with absolute precision. Every field must be filled, and descriptions must be clear and directly correspond to the offered products. Any errors or omissions here can lead to disqualification or a lower score.

Ensures the bid is evaluated correctly and avoids disqualification.
Proactive Sustainability Messaging
MediumLow effort

While not a primary evaluation criterion, highlighting any additional sustainability efforts (e.g., eco-friendly materials, durable design for longevity) can subtly enhance the bid's appeal, especially given the 'Green Procurement' mention. Frame repairability as a sustainability feature.

Adds a positive perception and aligns with the 'Green Procurement' aspect.
ESPD Completion and Verification
CriticalMed effort

The ESPD (Hankepass) must be completed accurately and submitted in the correct XML format. This is a mandatory administrative requirement. Double-check all sections and ensure consistency with other submitted documentation.

Prevents administrative disqualification.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective supplier without sacrificing essential quality and compliance. Emphasize the total cost of ownership, including durability and ease of repair, to counter purely price-driven competitors. Highlight robust supply chain and compliance processes to build confidence.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (5)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must submit an application with confirmations verifying the accuracy of submitted documents and the validity of the bid.
--Bidders must complete the provided ESPD (v2.0) in XML format (AI analysis not supported).
--Bidders must provide relevant evidence and instructions for wood sourcing, REACH substances, and furniture repair.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidder must confirm adherence to conditions set by the contracting authority (Hankepass).
--Bidder must provide evidence of legally sourced wood for furniture production.
--Bidder must declare REACH candidate substances used in furniture.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Furniture must meet the functional needs of Tiskre school.
--Furniture must be compatible with the interior design concept.
--Delivery and installation of furniture are required.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Total value of the tender is 440,000.0 EUR.
--Bidders must submit a detailed cost table with prices and descriptions for each offered product.
--Cost is the primary evaluation criterion.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306988_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.7 KB

The bidder must prove that legally sourced wood is used in furniture production, REACH candidate substances are declared, and furniture is easily repairable, by submitting relevant evidence and instructions.

Pakkuja hankes osalemise avaldus kinnitustegaDOC
Pakkuja hankes osalemise avaldus kinnitustega... -- 21.4 KB

Bidders must submit a declaration with confirmations, verifying the accuracy of submitted documents and the validity of the bid, to participate in the procurement of Tiskre School furnishings in Harku municipality.

Pakkumuse maksumuse tabelXLS
Pakkumuse maksumuse tabel.xlsx -- 10.8 MB

Bidders must submit a detailed cost table specifying the price and description of each offered item, filling in all required fields.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306988_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.2 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, where cost is the primary factor, and explains how points are calculated and the winner is determined.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306988_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 75.5 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and the format of expected responses, but is not a document intended for completion.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 56.4 KB

The draft contract project defines the terms and legal framework for the procurement contract for the furnishing of Tiskre School in Harku municipality.

Lisa 1 1 korruse põhiplaanPDF
Lisa 1 SA-5-0101 1 KORRUS PÕHIPLAAN.pdf -- 6.3 MB

The contracting authority provides the ground floor plan of the 1st floor, which is necessary for understanding the layout and dimensions of the school's furnishings.

Lisa 2 2 korruse põhiplaanPDF
Lisa 2 SA-5-0102 2 KORRUS PÕHIPLAAN.pdf -- 3.5 MB

This document contains the floor plan of the second floor of Tiskre school, necessary for understanding furniture placement and space utilization in the tender.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 44.0 KB

The contracting authority aims to furnish the Tiskre school building with furniture that meets functional needs and aligns with the interior design concept, including delivery, installation, and warranty.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for furnishing Tiskre School is well-structured with clear technical and submission requirements, but could benefit from more explicit sustainability criteria and a more integrated e-submission process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender exhibits good legal compliance with a specified CPV code, a clear procedure, and reasonable deadlines. The presence of a draft contract and adherence to e-procurement principles further strengthens this category. No immediate regulatory issues or disputes are apparent.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender's objective is clear, detailing the need to furnish the school according to functional requirements and design concepts. Specific documentation requirements are outlined, and evaluation criteria are mentioned. The inclusion of floor plans enhances clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the estimated value, duration, and contract start date. Key documents like the technical specification, draft contract, and submission forms are attached or referenced. However, the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed eligibility criteria within the provided snippet could be improved.

Mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly stated.
Fairness85/100

The tender demonstrates a good level of fairness by disclosing the estimated value and having objective evaluation criteria (cost weighting). Full document access is implied via the e-procurement portal. The requirement for legally sourced wood, REACH compliance, and repair instructions are objective criteria, not tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is designed for electronic submission and utilizes an e-procurement platform. The contract start date is specified. However, while 'Electronic Submission' and 'E-Procurement' are listed as characteristics, the reliance on a separate 'Hankepass' XML format that is not AI-analyzable and the need to download multiple documents might slightly reduce the overall ease of the submission process.

ESPD v2.0 XML format is not AI-analyzable, requiring manual processing.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, estimated value, and dates are consistently populated. The tender status indicates it is active. No suspension or disputes are noted, and the dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic. However, specific social aspects, innovation drivers, or indications of EU funding are not explicitly detailed or elaborated upon in the provided information. This suggests a moderate focus on broader sustainability goals beyond basic environmental considerations.

Lack of detailed criteria for social aspects or innovation.
No mention of EU funding.

Strengths

Clear description of procurement objective and technical requirements.
Objective evaluation criteria with cost as primary factor.
Good legal compliance and adherence to e-procurement principles.
Inclusion of floor plans to aid bidder understanding.

Concerns

Limited explicit detail on sustainability beyond 'Green Procurement'.
Potential usability issue with non-AI-analyzable ESPD format.
Absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds.

Recommendations

1. Elaborate on specific social and innovation criteria within the 'Green Procurement' characteristic.
2. Ensure all necessary document formats are machine-readable or provide clear guidance on manual processing.
3. Explicitly list mandatory exclusion grounds for enhanced clarity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline