Skip to main content
Tenders

National Road No. 49 Imavere – Viljandi – Karksi-Nuia Road km 6.97-15.648 Pavement Restoration

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306968
Value
€1,128,140
Location
Estonia
Published
March 04, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of environmentally friendly restoration of State Road No. 60 Pärnu-Lihula Road km 8.014-12.668%
CO₂ emission standards of construction machinery used4%
Asphalt mixtures used4%
Use of recycled asphalt (RA) in asphalt mixtures4%
Storage of aggregates used in asphalt mixtures4%
Use of biofuel in road vehicles used for asphalting works4%
Use of (bio)fuel in asphalt production4%
CO₂ emission standards of N-category trucks used4%
Use of lignin in asphalt mixture4%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,128,140
Duration
5 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Restoration of the pavement of National Road No. 49 Imavere – Viljandi – Karksi-Nuia Road km 6.97-15.648 in accordance with the conditions specified in the public procurement documents.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

26 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (13)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must confirm agreement with the tender conditions.
--Bidders must fill out the cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must mark and justify any business secrets.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion grounds are detailed in the "Riigihanke alusdokument.docx" document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS13
--Bidders must confirm their agreement with the tender conditions.
--Bidders must fill out the cost breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must mark and justify any business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The "Hankepass" (tender pass) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties.
--Conditions for checking subcontractors are defined, focusing on preventing fraud, money laundering, terrorism financing, and child labor.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total value of the tender is 1128140.0 EUR.
--The cost breakdown must be filled out in Excel (HD IV Kululoend.xlsx).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

15 documents available with AI summaries

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306968_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 29.9 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on exclusion grounds related to fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, and child labor.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306968_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 13.6 KB

Bidders must confirm acceptance of tender notice conditions, complete the cost breakdown in Excel, and identify and justify trade secrets, providing relevant data for joint bids.

HD IV KululoendXLS
HD IV Kululoend.xlsx -- 74.8 KB

The tender document includes a cost breakdown list, which is necessary for preparing and submitting a bid for road surface restoration.

HD IX Asfaltsegudes kasutatavate täitematerjalide hoiustamise kinnitusXLS
HD IX Asfaltsegudes kasutatavate täitematerja... -- 17.9 KB

The bidder must confirm that the aggregate materials and recycled asphalt used in the paving works are stored under cover as required.

HD VI Kasutatavate ehitusmasinate CO2- heitmenormide kinnitusXLS
HD VI Ehitusmasinate CO2 heitmenormide kinnit... -- 17.9 KB

Bidders must confirm that they will use construction machinery on-site meeting at least Stage 4 emission standards during asphalting and milling works, with specific exceptions.

HD VIII Asfaltsegudes kasutatava RA kasutamise kinnitusXLS
HD VIII Asfaltsegudes kasutatava RA kasutamis... -- 17.7 KB

Bidders must confirm the proportion of recycled asphalt (RA) used in asphalt mixtures according to the provided options.

HD VII Kasutatavate asfaltsegude kinnitusXLS
HD VII Kasutatavate asfaltsegude kinnitus.xls... -- 17.7 KB

Bidders must confirm which WMA asphalt mixtures they will use in the base layer's leveling and wearing courses.

HD V Kasutatavate N-kategooria veoautode CO₂-heitenormide kinnitusXLS
HD V N-kategooria veoautode CO2 heitmenormide... -- 17.7 KB

The bidder must confirm which EURO emission standard compliant trucks will be used for transporting construction materials to ensure environmental requirements are met.

HD XI Asfalditootmisel (bio)kütuse kasutamise kinnitusXLS
HD XI Asfalditootmisel (bio)kütuse kasutamise... -- 17.7 KB

The bidder must confirm which fuel (biofuel, natural gas, or neither) is used in the asphalt plant's drying drum burner for asphalt mixture production.

HD XII Asfaltsegus ligniini kasutamise kinnitusXLS
HD XII Asfaltsegus ligniini kasutamise kinnit... -- 17.6 KB

Bidders must confirm the use of lignin in the asphalt mixture for the wear and BIN layers.

HD X N-kategooria maanteesõidukitel biokütuse kasutamise kinnitusXLS
HD X N-kategooria maanteesõidukitel biokütuse... -- 17.7 KB

Bidders must confirm their biofuel usage rate for asphalt mixture transportation by selecting the appropriate category.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306968_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.6 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids based on price and environmentally friendly solutions, including CO2 emission reduction and the use of recycled materials.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306968_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 76.4 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and the format of expected responses from the operator.

HD XIII HindamismetoodikaDOC
HD XIII Hindamismetoodika.docx -- 37.9 KB

This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology, focusing on total cost and CO₂ emission standards for trucks.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 39.1 KB

The tender's foundational document contains the contracting authority's details, communication procedures, tender conditions, and bidder exclusion grounds and qualification requirements, all published on the e-procurement platform.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road surface restoration is well-structured with clear requirements, particularly strong on sustainability aspects and electronic submission. However, it lacks explicit mention of social criteria and innovation, and some practicalities for bidders could be improved.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements for public procurement. Deadlines are reasonable, the procedure is clear, and a relevant CPV code is provided. There is no immediate indication of disputes or regulatory issues.

Clarity80/100

The description of the work is concise, and key requirements are documented within various attached files. Criteria for evaluation are mentioned, though the specifics are detailed in separate documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and a clear deadline. However, the sheer number of separate documents for requirements might make it challenging for bidders to gather all necessary information without careful organization.

Fairness85/100

The tender offers full access to documents and discloses the estimated value. Criteria appear objective, and e-procurement is utilized. Requirements are detailed but seem generally applicable, without obvious tailoring to specific companies. The use of Hankepass as a self-declaration is a common and fair practice.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is good. However, the reliance on numerous specific Excel and .xlsx files for confirmations and cost breakdowns, while detailed, adds a layer of complexity. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, which can impact planning.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and estimated value are populated. Dates appear logical, and there is no indication of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

There is a strong emphasis on green procurement, with detailed requirements for emission standards of vehicles and machinery, recycled asphalt usage, and fuel types. However, explicit social criteria or innovation aspects are not mentioned. It is unclear if it is EU funded.

Lack of explicit social criteria.
No specific mention of innovation focus.

Strengths

Comprehensive environmental requirements (Green Procurement).
Clear use of e-procurement and e-submission.
Well-defined technical and eligibility requirements.
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration.

Concerns

Extensive reliance on multiple, specific document formats for submissions.
Absence of explicit social criteria and innovation focus.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Consolidate or better cross-reference submission documents to improve bidder experience.
2. Consider adding explicit social or innovation criteria if applicable to future tenders.
3. Include a specified contract start date or a timeframe for it.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline