Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction and Other Construction Works of the Pre-registration Hangar Office Space at Heli tn 2, Tallinn, for the Transport Administration

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
306963
Value
€68,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 06, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of reconstruction and other construction works of the pre-registration hangar office space at Heli tn 2, Tallinn100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Tender Opening

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€68,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction and other construction works of the pre-registration hangar office space at Heli tn 2, Tallinn, in accordance with the conditions set out in the tender documents. The period for carrying out the reconstruction works is 60 calendar days from the date indicated in the commencement order. The estimated total duration of the procurement contract indicated in the RHR includes the period for acceptance of the works by the Client, possible contract extensions, and other possible obligations of the Client, by which the contract execution period may be extended.
Electronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for office space reconstruction and garage construction at Transpordiamet's Heli tn 2 facility is heavily weighted towards price. A winning strategy will focus on delivering a highly competitive price while demonstrating robust technical capability and meticulous adherence to all submission requirements, particularly the site visit and mandatory documentation.

Key Winning Messages

Competitive Pricing, Guaranteed Quality: Delivering cost-effective reconstruction with assured technical execution.

Seamless Project Delivery: Efficiently managing reconstruction and construction works within the tight timeframe.

Trusted Partner for Transpordiamet: Demonstrating reliability and adherence to all tender stipulations.

Key Opportunities
Low estimated value suggests potential for less intense competition from larger firms, creating an opening for agile SMEs.
The explicit requirement for a price breakdown in Excel allows for detailed cost analysis and optimization to present a compellingly low price.
The recommended site visit provides an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the project's nuances, enabling more accurate pricing and technical proposals.
Key Challenges
The absence of specified evaluation criteria, coupled with the emphasis on cost, implies that price will be the dominant factor, potentially squeezing margins.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without compromising quality. Explore efficient construction methods and material sourcing.

The 60-day reconstruction period is tight and requires meticulous planning and efficient execution. Any delays could lead to penalties.

Develop a detailed project schedule with clear milestones and contingency plans. Ensure sufficient resources and skilled labor are allocated from the outset.

Mandatory registration for the site visit and strict adherence to submission deadlines are critical, with no room for error.

Establish internal checklists and assign responsibility for ensuring all mandatory steps, including site visit registration and timely submission, are completed accurately and on time.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized construction company with proven experience in office renovations and smaller-scale civil works, capable of acting as a main contractor. They should possess a strong understanding of Estonian construction regulations and a highly efficient operational model to offer a competitive price.
Key Requirements
Submission of a completed price breakdown in Excel format.
Mandatory prior registration for the site visit.
Confirmation of agreement with tender notice conditions.
Acting as the main contractor.
Submission of a completed ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) in XML format.
Key Discriminators
Exceptional price competitiveness achieved through lean operations and optimized material sourcing.
Demonstrated understanding of the specific site conditions and technical requirements, evidenced by a highly detailed and accurate price breakdown.
Proactive communication and a clear plan for efficient project execution within the 60-day timeframe.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on commitment to local employment or responsible waste management during construction, if feasible within the cost structure. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors ignore it.
Bid Focus Areas
PriceN/A (assumed highest)

Submit the lowest possible compliant price. Conduct a granular cost breakdown to identify all cost-saving opportunities. Ensure no errors in the price breakdown format.

Technical CapabilityN/A (assumed secondary)

Clearly demonstrate experience as a main contractor for similar office reconstruction and construction works. Highlight efficient project management methodologies.

ComplianceN/A (assumed critical)

Meticulously follow all submission instructions, including the ESPD, price breakdown format, and site visit registration. Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are addressed.

Recommendations6
Prioritize Site Visit and Registration
CriticalLow effort

Mandatory registration for the site visit must be completed well in advance of the deadline. Attend the site visit with a clear objective to understand all technical aspects and potential challenges to inform pricing and methodology.

Ensures eligibility and provides crucial information for a competitive and accurate bid.
Aggressively Price for Lowest Cost
CriticalHigh effort

Given the likely price-driven evaluation, develop a highly competitive price. This requires detailed costings, efficient resource allocation, and potentially exploring cost-saving material alternatives where permissible by technical specifications.

Maximizes score in the primary evaluation criterion.
Meticulous Price Breakdown Accuracy
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the Excel price breakdown is completed precisely as requested, with no errors or omissions. This document is a key deliverable and any inaccuracies could lead to disqualification or a lower score.

Ensures compliance and facilitates a clear understanding of the bid's cost structure.
Highlight Main Contractor Experience
MediumMed effort

Emphasize previous experience acting as a main contractor for similar projects. This demonstrates capability to manage the entire scope of works and coordinate subcontractors effectively.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute the project successfully.
Develop a Robust 60-Day Project Schedule
HighMed effort

Create a detailed, realistic project schedule that accounts for the 60-day completion period. Include buffer time for unforeseen issues and clearly outline resource allocation to meet deadlines.

Mitigates risk of delays and potential penalties, demonstrating project management competence.
Thorough ESPD Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is completed accurately and comprehensively. This is a mandatory document and any errors can lead to exclusion.

Ensures compliance with procurement regulations.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the essential technical requirements. Highlight efficiency and a streamlined approach to project delivery. Emphasize a clear understanding of the project scope gained from the site visit.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

29 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (18)
Mandatory (3)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS18
--Site visit is recommended.
--Site visits will take place on 17.03.2026 and 24.03.2026 from 10-11 AM at Heli tn 2, Tallinn.
--Prior registration for the site visit is mandatory.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS3
--Bidders must confirm agreement with the tender notice conditions.
--Bidders must submit a completed price breakdown in Excel.
--Bidders must explain trade secrets if applicable.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--All companies are invited to attend the site visit.
--Maximum 2 people per company for the site visit.
--The tender is for office building construction works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The project involves reconstruction and other construction works for office space in a hangar.
--The project includes reconstruction of office space, and construction of a garage building roof, plinth, and technological channel.
--The contractor must act as the main contractor.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The estimated value of the tender is 68000.0 EUR.
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
306963_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.7 KB

The bidder must confirm agreement with the tender notice conditions, submit a completed price breakdown in Excel, and explain any business secrets if applicable.

HD IV Hinnapakkumuse jaotusXLS
HD IV Hinnapakkumuse jaotus.xlsx -- 19.1 KB

The contracting authority requests a breakdown of the cost for the reconstruction and expansion of the pre-registration hangar office space at Heli tn 2, Tallinn for the Transport Administration.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306963_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306963_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 43.4 KB

The "Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega" provides information about the procurement procedure and the contracting authority, clarifying expected bidder responses, but is not intended for completion.

HD II Hankelepingu projektDOC
HD II Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 51.9 KB

This document is a draft construction contractor agreement outlining the terms, obligations, and appendices for the reconstruction of office space and other construction works at Heli tn 2, Tallinn.

HD III Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
HD III Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 35.4 MB

This technical specification details the requirements for the reconstruction of Transpordiamet's office space at Heli tn 2 and construction works on the garage building's roof, plinth, and technological channel, to be executed by the general contractor.

Riigihanke alusdokumentDOC
Riigihanke alusdokument.docx -- 33.6 KB

The tender's base document contains the contracting authority's details, tender procedure rules, bidder exclusion grounds, and qualification conditions, all accessible via the e-procurement environment.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for office space reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on the e-procurement platform for full document access.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's scope and value. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the public nature of the procurement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented within the provided tender documents. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, indicating a clear approach to bid assessment. Conditions of conformity are also present.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and duration. However, the full scope of contract duration is described as including potential extensions and acceptance periods, which could be more precisely defined. The availability of numerous attached documents contributes to completeness.

Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the evaluation is primarily cost-based, which is objective. The site visit, while recommended, has mandatory pre-registration and limited attendance, which is a minor constraint but not indicative of unfair tailoring.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a URL for the e-procurement platform is provided. The contract start date is not explicitly stated but implied by the tender timeline. Financing information is not detailed, and the duration is specified in days, which is practical.

Financing information is not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which limits the scope for sustainability integration.

No explicit mention of green procurement.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear description of reconstruction works.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement platform.
Objective cost-based evaluation criteria.
Well-defined timeline with submission and opening dates.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria.
Limited detail on contract start date and financing.
Site visit has mandatory pre-registration and attendance limits.

Recommendations

1. Consider incorporating specific sustainability objectives into future tenders.
2. Provide more precise details on contract start dates and financing arrangements.
3. Review site visit registration requirements for broader accessibility if feasible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline