Reikia konkursų eksperto pagalbos? Žiūrėk mūsų konkursų rengimo paslaugą
Atgal į konkursus

Reconstruction of Suurenõmme-Kohatu roads

Uždarytas

Pateikimo terminas pasibaigė

Šio konkurso pateikimo terminas pasibaigė ir paraiškos nebepriimamos. Žemiau pateikta informacija saugoma informaciniais tikslais.

Naršyti aktyvius konkursus
Galutinis terminas
Pasibaigęs
2026 m. vasario 3 d.
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Statyba
Nuoroda
304593
Vertė
€700,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
2026 m. sausio 8 d.
CPV kodas
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

2026 m. sausio 8 d.

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

2026 m. sausio 27 d.

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

2026 m. vasario 3 d.

Konkurso atidarymas

2026 m. vasario 3 d.

Sutarties pradžios data

2026 m. kovo 24 d.

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€700,000
Trukmė
Nenurodyta
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Statyba
67
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€524,963
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.7
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
94%
5,932 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Hanke esemeks on Koolitoa metsatee (1,00 km), Kääbaste-Suurenõmme tee (0,37 km), Suurenõmme-Tagametsa tee (0,99 km), Lümandu-Metsanurga tee (3,39 km), Jäägri tee (1,18 km), Kirikla-Kohatu tee (1,225 km) ja Kernu-Orjaku tee (1,67 km), mis asuvad Muusika, Ruila, Tagametsa, Kirikla, Kohatu ja Kernu külas Saue vallas Harju maakonnas ning Lümandu külas Kohila vallas Rapla maakonnas.. Täpsem tööde tehniline kirjeldus on esitatud HD Lisas 2.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Vykdyti rizikos analizę

Nustatykite galimas rizikas, neatitikimus ir įspėjamuosius signalus visuose konkurso dokumentuose. Gaukite išsamią rizikos ataskaitą su rimtumo lygiais ir rizikos mažinimo rekomendacijomis.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Gaukite dirbtinio intelekto parengtą laimėjimo strategiją, pritaikytą šiam konkursui. Apima laimėjimo tikimybės balą, pagrindines galimybes ir iššūkius, rekomenduojamas pasiūlymo sritis, konkurencinės padėties analizę ir praktinius patarimus jūsų galimybėms maksimizuoti.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

11 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (4)
Privalomas (1)
Atitiktis (3)
Techninis (2)
Finansinis (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Adhere to the cost submission structure.
--Provide a power of attorney for joint bids (if applicable).
--Submit a price proposal form detailing work descriptions, volumes, unit prices, and total amounts.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Subcontractors must not have grounds for exclusion such as fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Confirm tender compliance.
--Complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) addressing exclusion grounds and qualification criteria.
--Ensure first-tier subcontractors submit a procurement passport and demonstrate reliability.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Meet technical requirements for road reconstruction, including felling, stump removal, culvert construction, embankment compaction, and specified pavement material and thickness.
--Perform reconstruction of forest roads in Saue and Kohila municipalities.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit a mandatory 1500 EUR tender guarantee.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 10 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
304593_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors during the contract performance phase, focusing on the grounds for exclusion of first-tier subcontractors such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring them to submit a procurement passport and demonstrate reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
304593_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.0 KB

Bidders must confirm tender compliance, adhere to the cost submission structure, provide a power of attorney for joint bids, and submit a mandatory 1500 EUR tender guarantee.

Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vorm_Suurenõmme-Kohat... -- 53.8 KB

This document is a price proposal form for the Suurenõmme-Kohatu road reconstruction tender, requiring bidders to provide work descriptions, volumes, unit prices, and total amounts.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304593_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This document specifies that bids will be evaluated 100% based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304593_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 72.8 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected responses regarding exclusion grounds and qualification criteria, but this specific PDF does not need to be submitted.

HankedokumentPDF
HD_Suurenõmme-Kohatu.pdf -- 595.3 KB

This tender document outlines the general terms, scope of work, legal basis, and deadlines for the "Suurenõmme-Kohatu teede rekonstrueerimine" road reconstruction public procurement, referencing specific projects and legislation.

Lisa 2 - Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 2 - Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 279.4 KB

This document details the technical requirements for the reconstruction of several forest roads in Saue and Kohila municipalities, including felling, stump removal, culvert construction, embankment compaction, and specifications for pavement material and thickness.

Lisa 3 - Hankelepingu vormPDF
Lisa 3 - Hankelepingu vorm.pdf -- 681.7 KB

This document is a draft contract outlining the scope of work for the reconstruction of Suurenõmme-Kohatu roads, detailing the rights and obligations of both the contracting authority and the contractor, and referencing the underlying projects and legal acts.

Lisa 4 - Pakkumuses kasutatavad vormidZIP
Lisa 4 - Pakkumuses kasutatavad vormid.zip -- 41.3 KB

Šiam dokumentui santrauka nepateikta.

Lisa 5 - ProjektZIP
Lisa 5 - Projekt.zip -- 21.0 MB

Šiam dokumentui santrauka nepateikta.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

67
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline, but suffers from a critical inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria and a lack of explicit contract duration.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender appears to comply with national procurement regulations, utilizing standard documents like ESPD and providing reasonable deadlines. However, the procedure type 'A' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic are not fully aligned with the stated 100% lowest price evaluation, creating a minor ambiguity.

•Ambiguity regarding the exact procedure type and the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic in conjunction with 100% lowest price evaluation.
Aiškumas70/100

The project description and technical requirements are clear and detailed. However, a significant clarity issue arises from the contradiction between the 'relative_weighting' characteristic in the basic information and the explicit '100% based on total cost' evaluation stated in Document 7. This could confuse bidders.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% lowest price).
Užbaigtumas70/100

Most essential information, including title, organization, value, and detailed requirements, is provided. However, the explicit contract duration is not clearly stated in the basic information or AI summaries, which is a notable omission for bidders planning.

•Missing explicit contract duration.
Sąžiningumas80/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, reasonable submission deadlines, and electronic submission. The evaluation criteria, once clarified to be 100% lowest price, are objective. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

•The inconsistency in evaluation criteria could temporarily impact transparency until clarified.
Praktiškumas65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and a contract start date is provided. However, the absence of a clear contract duration makes it challenging for bidders to accurately plan resources and project timelines, impacting the practicality of bid preparation and project execution.

•Missing explicit contract duration.
Duomenų nuoseklumas50/100

Most data fields are populated and dates are logical. The primary and critical inconsistency lies in the conflicting statements regarding evaluation criteria: 'relative_weighting' in the characteristics versus '100% based on total cost' in the dedicated evaluation criteria document.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% lowest price).
Tvarumas30/100

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social, or innovation-focused criteria. It appears to be a standard infrastructure project without specific sustainability objectives.

•Absence of green, social, or innovation criteria.

Privalumai

Clear and detailed technical description of works.
Value disclosed and reasonable submission deadline.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided.
Justification for not dividing into parts provided.

Problemos

Critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% lowest price).
Lack of explicit contract duration.
Absence of specific green, social, or innovation procurement criteria.
Ambiguity regarding the exact procurement procedure type ('Type E', 'Procedure A', 'Negotiation Allowed').

Rekomendacijos

1. Clarify and rectify the conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria immediately.
2. Explicitly state the estimated contract duration to aid bidder planning.
3. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation aspects into future tenders where applicable.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes