Tenders

Design of sewage system in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 18, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
305780
Value
€4,000
Location
Estonia
Published
February 03, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Lowest total cost (excluding VAT)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 11, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 18, 2026

Tender Opening

February 18, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€4,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
73
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement contract is the design of the reconstruction of the sewage system located in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality, in accordance with the tender documents. The scope of work includes: - approx. 85 m of pressure sewage pipeline; - 1 sewage pumping station. The scope of work includes geodesic surveys according to the terms of reference, preparation of the main project with all necessary approvals, and application for building permits.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The bid must be submitted electronically in the e-procurement environment according to the predefined structure.
--Business secrets must be clearly marked in the bid.
--The bid must include acceptance of the tender conditions (including the draft contract agreement).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer and each joint tenderer must confirm that there are no grounds for exclusion from the procurement procedure (e.g., crimes, tax debt).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must hold valid economic activity notices in the field of public water supply and sewerage design.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The scope, objectives, and requirements of the design work must comply with the terms of reference for the reconstruction design of the wastewater pump station and pressure pipeline in Piistaoja village, Tori rural municipality, including standards and underlying documents.
--The tenderer must provide a list of similar design works completed in the last 36 months to prove qualification and experience.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid will be evaluated solely on the basis of the lowest total cost (excluding VAT).
--The bid cost must be presented with a clear structure.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305780_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.9 KB

This document outlines tender submission requirements, including declaring business secrets, structuring the offer cost, accepting tender conditions, and providing a power of attorney for joint bids.

Pakkuja (iga ühispakkuja) kinnitus kõrvaldamise aluste puudumise kohtaDOC
Vorm KI.doc -- 26.0 KB

The bidder (and each joint bidder) must submit a confirmation stating that there are no grounds for their exclusion from the procurement procedure, which is required for tender submission.

Pakkuja poolt viimase 36 kuu jooksul teostatud sarnaste projekteerimistööde loet...DOC
Vorm KII.doc -- 32.5 KB

Tenderers must submit a list of similar design works completed within the last 36 months to demonstrate their qualifications and experience.

Pakkumusteade (Vorm PI)DOC
Vorm PI.doc -- 28.5 KB

This document is a tender notice (Form PI) providing a general overview and conditions for the procurement of wastewater sewerage design in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305780_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

Bids for the design of the wastewater sewerage system in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality, will be evaluated solely based on the lowest total cost (excluding VAT), which constitutes 100% of the evaluation criteria.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305780_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 7.8 KB

This document outlines bidder exclusion grounds (e.g., criminal offenses, tax debt) and qualification conditions, requiring valid economic activity notices in the field of public water supply and sewerage design.

LähteülesannePDF
Lähteülessanne Piistaoja reoveepumpla ja surv... -- 228.9 KB

This document details the scope, objectives, and requirements, including standards and reference documents, for the design work of reconstructing a wastewater pumping station and pressure pipeline in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality.

LepingDOC
Projekteerimise töövõtuleping.docx -- 27.3 KB

This document is a draft design service contract for the reconstruction of wastewater sewerage in Piistaoja village, Tori municipality, with AS Pärnu Vesi as the client.

Ühispakkujate volikiri (Vorm PII)DOC
Vorm PII.doc -- 31.0 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint tenderers, authorizing one member of a joint bidding group to represent the others in the submission of the tender and throughout the procurement process.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

73
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured and legally compliant, providing comprehensive documentation and clear requirements for a wastewater design project. However, the exceptionally low estimated value raises significant concerns regarding fairness and practicality, potentially limiting competition and the quality of bids.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, with a reasonable submission deadline and clear definition of the negotiation procedure. CPV codes are appropriate, and references to the Estonian Public Procurement Act (RHS) indicate compliance with national regulations. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Minor inconsistency between 'relative_weighting' characteristic and explicit 'lowest total cost (100%)' evaluation criteria in documents.
Clarity80/100

The project description is clear, detailing the scope of design work for the wastewater system. Requirements for eligibility, technical capability, and submission are well-documented and understandable, supported by specific forms. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as lowest cost.

Conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' in characteristics vs. 'lowest total cost' in documents).
Completeness90/100

The tender is comprehensive, providing all essential information such as title, reference, organization, detailed description, financial data, and timelines. All required documents, including technical specifications, qualification criteria, and contract drafts, are attached and appear to cover all necessary aspects for bidders to prepare a submission.

Fairness65/100

The tender promotes fairness through electronic submission and e-procurement, ensuring equal access. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are objective and transparent. Qualification requirements are standard and not tailored. The submission deadline is reasonable.

The estimated value of 4,000 EUR for a design project of this nature appears exceptionally low, which could significantly deter qualified bidders and limit competition.
Practicality55/100

Electronic submission is supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. Financing conditions are referenced in the contract. However, the extremely low estimated value is a major concern.

The extremely low estimated value (4,000 EUR) is unlikely to attract competent design firms, potentially leading to a lack of viable bids or necessitating re-tendering.
The specific project duration is not immediately apparent from the summary.
Data Consistency70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Inconsistency in the evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest total cost').
Contradiction between 'Value Classified: Yes' and the explicit disclosure of 'Estimated Value: 4,000.00 EUR'.
Sustainability20/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or considerations for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.

Complete absence of sustainability considerations.
No green procurement, social, or innovation focus.

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation with clear requirements.
Legal compliance with national procurement acts and reasonable deadlines.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled for accessibility.
Clear project description and scope of work.
Objective and transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price).

Concerns

Extremely low estimated value (4,000 EUR) for the scope of design work, potentially deterring qualified bidders.
Inconsistency in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest cost).
Lack of any sustainability, green procurement, or social criteria.
Project duration not explicitly stated in the summary.
Potential for limited competition due to low estimated value.

Recommendations

1. Re-evaluate the estimated value to ensure it is realistic and attractive to competent design firms, potentially increasing the budget to foster better competition.
2. Correct the inconsistency in the evaluation criteria description to clearly state 'lowest total cost' across all tender documents and metadata.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability, green procurement, or social responsibility criteria into future tenders, even for design services.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline