← Back to Tenders
Estonia0 days leftClosed

Pärnu County, Pärnu City, Lemmetsa village and Ridalepa village, repair of Audru regional substation Lavassaare 10kV feeder poles M133-126 and wire replacement (IP8254)

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Elektrilevi OÜ

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€19,354

DEADLINE

February 02, 2026 at 11:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45310000-3

REFERENCE

305335

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Hange on välja kuulutatud: Pärnu maakond, Pärnu linn, Lemmetsa küla ja Ridalepa küla, Audru piirkonnaalajaama Lavassaare 10kV fiidri mastide M133-126 remondiks ja juhtmete vahetuseks (IP8254) Ehitada vastavalt projektile. Tööde teostamise tähtaeg on 24.07.2026; Kaetud juhtmega õhuliin 99 mm2 (BLL99) hangib ELV. BLL soovist anda teada 1 kuu enne paigaldust. Elektrilevi poolt hangitavate seadmete ja materjalide transport ning sellega kaasnevad kulud Elektrilevi tarnepartnerilt objektile kuuluvad töövõtja töö mahtu. Võimalusel ja vajadusel võib lepingu sõlmida ja tööde teostamise/teenuste tellimisega alustada enne hanke kohta üldandmetes avaldatud lepingu kehtivuse eeldatavat algusaega. Hankemenetluse kulgemise pikenemisel üle selle aja võib lepingu sõlmida ja selle täitmisega alustada ka peale üldandmetes avaldatud lepingu kehtivuse eeldatavat algusaega. Tööde teostamise tähtaeg sellest ei muutu.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The tenderer must not have been convicted of crimes.
  • The tenderer must not have tax debts.
  • The tenderer must not have previously breached contract agreements.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Confirm the compliance of the bid with the conditions.
  • Provide data on representation rights.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Have experience with at least three similar electricity works contracts successfully completed within the last 60 months.
  • At least one of the previous contracts must have a value of 40,000 EUR or more.
  • Possess a qualified switch operator.
  • Possess a C-person (specific certified individual for electrical works).
  • Familiarize oneself with the object (site) and tender documents.
  • Account for potential changes in work volume.
  • Handle landowner notification.
  • Perform brush removal.
  • Consider soil conditions.
  • Be capable of performing live-line work due to limited interruption time.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • (No specific financial capability requirements beyond exclusion grounds.)
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a cost table.
  • Submit a list of at least three successfully completed electricity construction contracts from the last 60 months, with at least one having a value of 40,000 EUR or more.
  • Grant permission for the contracting authority to make inquiries about the performance of previous contracts.
  • Submit confirmation of bid compliance.
  • Submit data on representation rights.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused305335_vastavustingimused.pdf9.7 KB
Summary:
This document outlines bid submission conditions, requiring confirmation of bid compliance, submission of a cost table, the presence of qualified switching personnel and a designated C-person, and details regarding representation rights.
DOC
Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioon
ViitedVarasemate hankelepingute informatsioon....22.3 KB
Summary:
Bidders must submit a list of at least three properly executed electricity construction contracts from the last 60 months, with at least one contract valued at 40,000 EUR or more, and grant permission for inquiries regarding contract performance.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid305335_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.9 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the tender evaluation methodology, where the total offer cost is the sole criterion (100% weight), with the lowest-priced offer receiving the maximum points.
PDF
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimused
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded305335_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitse...7.2 KB
Summary:
This document outlines mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds (e.g., criminal offenses, tax debts, past contract breaches) and qualification criteria, specifically requiring bidders to have successfully completed at least three similar electricity installation contracts within the last 60 months.
DOC
Hanke lisatingimused IP8254
Hanke TingimusedHanke lisatingimused IP8254.docx19.5 KB
Summary:
This document outlines additional conditions and requirements for bidders, emphasizing the need to review the site and documents, account for scope changes, landowner notification, vegetation removal, ground conditions, and limited outage time requiring live-line work.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for electrical installation works is generally well-structured and clear for a small-value procurement, demonstrating good legal compliance and practicality, though it exhibits some data inconsistencies and lacks specific sustainability criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears legally compliant for a small-value utility procurement, with reasonable deadlines, appropriate CPV codes, and no detected disputes. The procedure type is defined by codes, which are likely clear within the national procurement framework.

•The flag "Value Classified: Yes" alongside a disclosed estimated value is a minor ambiguity.
Clarity80/100

The tender's description, requirements, and performance conditions are clear and unambiguous. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as the lowest price, ensuring transparency for bidders.

•A minor inconsistency exists between the "relative_weighting" characteristic and the document stating 100% cost as the sole criterion.
Completeness70/100

All essential basic, financial, timeline, and location information is provided. While critical documents like the project plan and basic procurement documents are listed, their content could not be fully analyzed, limiting a comprehensive assessment of their internal completeness.

•Inability to analyze content of .zip and .xls documents (Project, Basic Documents, Cost Table) prevents full verification of detailed completeness.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed estimated value, reasonable deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price). Requirements for technical capability, while specific, appear to ensure competence rather than being tailored.

•The experience requirement (one contract > 40,000 EUR) is higher than the tender's estimated value (19,354 EUR), which might slightly limit participation for smaller firms, though it's not considered tailored.
Practicality85/100

The tender is highly practical, supporting electronic submission and providing clear contract start dates, duration, and detailed financing conditions, including payment terms and factoring options.

•Explicit document URLs were not provided in the extracted text, though implied by e-procurement.
Data Consistency65/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are inconsistencies between the general characteristics ("relative_weighting" for evaluation) and the specific document content (100% cost), and between "Estimated Value" and "Value Classified: Yes".

•Contradictory information regarding evaluation criteria and value classification.
Sustainability50/100

While the tender is EU-funded, which often implies higher standards, it explicitly lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus.

•Absence of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear scope and technical requirements.
Objective and transparent evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Detailed and practical financing conditions.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
EU-funded, suggesting adherence to broader governance standards.

Concerns

Inconsistencies in data (evaluation criteria, value classification).
Experience requirement (40k EUR) is relatively high for a 19k EUR tender.
Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation sustainability criteria.
Critical tender documents (e.g., project plan) were not available for AI content analysis.

Recommendations

1. Ensure full consistency between tender characteristics metadata and detailed document content, especially for evaluation criteria.
2. Consider reviewing experience requirements to ensure they are proportionate to the tender's value, balancing competence with broader market access.
3. Integrate specific sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) where applicable, leveraging the EU funding aspect.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
75/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes