Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Development, maintenance and development of the mobile application of the Riga City Municipality

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
163826
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€220,792
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
2,497 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development, maintenance and development of the mobile application of the Riga City Municipality

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender presents a significant opportunity to develop and maintain a critical mobile application for Riga City Municipality. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a strong focus on demonstrating technical excellence, a clear understanding of user needs, and a robust, scalable solution will be paramount. Proactive engagement and a compelling value proposition beyond basic requirements are key to success.

Key Winning Messages

Delivering a user-centric, secure, and scalable mobile platform that enhances citizen engagement and municipal service delivery for Riga.

A trusted, long-term partner committed to the continuous evolution and success of the Riga City Municipality's digital presence.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for a bidder to define and champion their own value proposition and demonstrate superior technical and strategic thinking.
Opportunity to showcase innovative approaches to user experience (UX) and user interface (UI) design that align with modern citizen expectations.
The 36-month duration allows for a deep partnership and iterative development, fostering loyalty and demonstrating long-term commitment.
Key Challenges
Absence of specified evaluation criteria creates uncertainty and requires a proactive approach to demonstrating value.

Develop a clear, compelling proposal that anticipates the likely evaluation priorities (e.g., technical merit, user experience, cost-effectiveness, long-term support) and explicitly addresses them. Consider framing the proposal around a self-defined set of weighted criteria that highlight the bidder's strengths.

Potential for a highly competitive bid due to the nature of public sector IT projects and the lack of explicit differentiators.

Focus on demonstrating a deep understanding of the municipality's needs and the specific context of Riga. Highlight unique methodologies, experienced teams, and a clear vision for the app's future evolution that goes beyond the stated requirements.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A highly experienced software development company with a proven track record in building and managing complex, user-centric mobile applications for public sector clients. The ideal bidder possesses strong project management capabilities, a deep understanding of agile development methodologies, and a commitment to long-term partnership and continuous improvement.
Key Requirements
Development, maintenance, and evolution of the Riga City Municipality's mobile application.
Technical specification outlining purpose, architecture, functional and non-functional requirements, and development phases.
Technical and financial requirements, and evaluation criteria (though not specified, these will be crucial to address).
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated expertise in developing highly accessible and inclusive mobile applications for diverse user groups.
A robust and transparent approach to data security and privacy, exceeding minimum requirements.
A proactive and collaborative approach to ongoing maintenance and feature development, showcasing a true partnership model.
A clear roadmap for future innovation and adaptation of the app to emerging technologies and citizen needs.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to employing local talent for development and maintenance roles, fostering economic growth within Riga.
Proactive user training and support programs for municipal staff and citizens to ensure maximum adoption and utilization of the app.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (assumed)

Provide detailed technical specifications, architectural diagrams, and a clear development methodology. Emphasize scalability, security, and maintainability. Showcase past projects with similar complexity and scale.

User Experience (UX) and User Interface (UI) Design (assumed)

Present a user-centric design philosophy. Include mockups or wireframes demonstrating intuitive navigation, accessibility, and a modern aesthetic. Highlight user research methodologies.

Project Management and Delivery (assumed)

Outline a clear project plan with milestones, risk management strategies, and communication protocols. Emphasize agile methodologies and a proven ability to deliver on time and within budget.

Long-term Maintenance and Evolution (assumed)

Detail a comprehensive maintenance plan, including bug fixing, performance monitoring, and security updates. Propose a framework for future development and feature enhancements based on user feedback and evolving municipal needs.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Analyze Technical Specifications
CriticalHigh effort

Deeply understand and meticulously address all functional and non-functional requirements detailed in 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'. This includes architecture, performance, security, and usability standards.

Ensures compliance and forms the technical foundation of the bid.
Proactively Define Value Proposition
CriticalHigh effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, create a compelling narrative that highlights your unique strengths and how they directly benefit the Riga City Municipality. Consider proposing a weighted scoring system that favors your strengths.

Guides the evaluation and positions your bid favorably.
Emphasize User-Centric Design and Accessibility
HighMed effort

Showcase a strong commitment to creating an intuitive, accessible, and inclusive mobile application that caters to all citizens of Riga. Provide evidence of past successes in this area.

Addresses potential unstated but critical municipal priorities for citizen engagement.
Develop a Robust Long-Term Partnership Model
HighMed effort

Outline a clear strategy for ongoing maintenance, support, and iterative development. Position your company as a strategic partner, not just a vendor, committed to the app's long-term success.

Demonstrates commitment and reduces perceived risk for the municipality.
Integrate Local Employment and Training Commitments
MediumLow effort

Include specific commitments to hiring and training local IT professionals in Riga for the project, contributing to the local economy and skill development.

Addresses potential social value considerations and enhances community relations.
Address Security and Data Privacy Proactively
MediumMed effort

Detail stringent security measures and data privacy protocols that exceed standard requirements, demonstrating a commitment to protecting sensitive municipal and citizen data.

Mitigates a key risk for public sector IT projects and builds trust.
Prepare a Detailed Financial Proposal
MediumHigh effort

Even though not explicitly detailed, a clear, competitive, and transparent financial proposal is essential. Break down costs logically and justify them based on the proposed solution and value.

Crucial for the financial evaluation and overall bid competitiveness.
Competitive Positioning
Position your bid as the most forward-thinking and user-centric solution, emphasizing innovation in UX/UI and a proactive approach to future development, even without explicit 'innovative aspects' noted.
Highlight your company's stability, experience, and commitment to long-term partnerships, differentiating from potentially smaller or less experienced competitors.
Focus on demonstrating a deep understanding of the specific needs and context of Riga City Municipality, showing you've done your homework beyond the tender document.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163826_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260311051002.pdf -- 94.7 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements, as well as evaluation criteria, for the development, maintenance, and evolution of the Riga City Municipality's mobile application.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
1.pielikums_Tehniskā specifikācija iepirkumam... -- 288.5 KB

This document contains the technical specification for the development, maintenance, and evolution of the Riga City Municipality's mobile application, outlining its purpose, architecture, functional and non-functional requirements, and development phases.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for the open tender CAIP 2026/11 concerning the development, maintenance, and evolution of the Riga City Municipality's mobile application.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the development, maintenance, and evolution of a mobile application for Riga City Municipality is generally well-structured, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear open procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria in the main notice and the reliance on attached documents for detailed requirements reduce overall clarity for initial assessment.

Missing evaluation criteria in main notice
Completeness70/100

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are present. Contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like evaluation criteria and specific exclusion/eligibility requirements are not readily available in the main notice, requiring access to attached documents.

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified in main notice
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, restricted document access and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria in the main notice could be perceived as hindering full transparency and fairness.

Restricted document access
Evaluation criteria not disclosed in main notice
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. The contract duration is specified. However, the lack of explicit mention of financing information and the potential for restricted document access could pose minor practical challenges.

Potential restricted document access
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported, indicating logical data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The funding source (EU funded) is not specified.

No mention of green procurement
No mention of social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open procurement procedure
E-procurement utilized
Reasonable submission deadline
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified in main notice
Restricted document access
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly state evaluation criteria in the main tender notice.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline