Tenders

Lääne County, Haapsalu City, Puise Village, Reconstruction of 0.85 km MP overhead line (JTI251)

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
January 28, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
305159
Value
€20,000
Location
Estonia
Published
January 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

January 21, 2026

Submission Deadline

January 28, 2026

Tender Opening

January 28, 2026

Contract Start Date

January 28, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€20,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
69
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Hange on välja kuulutatud Lääne maakonnas Haapsalu linnas Puise külas 0,85 km MP õhuliini rekonstrueerimiseks (JTI251) Ehitada vastavalt remondiprojektile ja töömahtude tabeli täiendavatele kommentaaridele. Tööde teostamise tähtaeg on 31.07.2026 Arvesti hangib ELV. Elektrilevi poolt hangitavate seadmete ja materjalide transport ning sellega kaasnevad kulud Elektrilevi tarnepartnerilt objektile kuuluvad töövõtja töö mahtu. NB! Palume tähelepanu pöörata 18.06.2024 kehtima hakanud dokumendile „P135 Elektripaigaldise ehitustööde töövõtulepingu tüüptingimused ver. 23".
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must be submitted in accordance with the tender document requirements.
--The bid must include the total cost excluding taxes.
--All requirements must be fulfilled and confirmed upon bid submission.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must not be subject to mandatory or voluntary exclusion grounds as described by the contracting authority.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The bidder must meet the requirements for representation rights.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bidder must have successfully completed at least three similar electricity construction contracts within the last 60 months.
--One of the aforementioned contracts must have a value of at least 40,000 EUR.
--The team must include a qualified "lülitaja" (switcher/operator).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are stated.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
305159_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.2 KB

This document outlines mandatory compliance conditions for bid submission, including confirming adherence to tender terms, submitting a cost table, having certified personnel (switchman, C-person) registered in Elektrilevi's partner portal, and providing representation details.

Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioonDOC
Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioon.docx -- 22.3 KB

Bidders must have successfully completed at least three similar electricity construction contracts within the last 60 months, with one contract valued at a minimum of 40,000 euros, and are required to submit a detailed list of these projects.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305159_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.9 KB

This tender evaluates offers solely based on the total cost excluding taxes, with the lowest price being the most economically advantageous offer.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305159_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 7.1 KB

This document details mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds and requires bidders to have successfully completed at least three similar electrical construction contracts in the last 60 months, with one exceeding a specified value.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

69
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender demonstrates good foundational elements with clear project description and payment terms, but is hampered by inconsistencies, potentially restrictive qualification criteria, and an impractical contract start date.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, defining the procedure type and CPV codes correctly. However, there is a notable inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria, stating 'relative_weighting' in characteristics but 'lowest price' in the specific evaluation document.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Clarity80/100

The project description, performance conditions, and payment terms are clearly articulated. The AI-extracted requirements are also well-defined. The primary detractor from clarity is the conflicting information on evaluation criteria.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Completeness70/100

Basic information, deadlines, and value are comprehensively provided. However, several critical tender documents (e.g., 'Väikehanke alusdokumendid', 'Tööprojekt', 'Maksumuse tabel') were not analyzed due to their file format, which limits a full assessment of the tender's completeness from the provided content.

Critical tender documents (zip, xls) not analyzed, limiting full content assessment.
Fairness65/100

While e-procurement is enabled, concerns arise from the technical capability requirements. Requiring a past contract value of 40,000 EUR for a 20,000 EUR tender, and personnel registration in Elektrilevi's specific partner portal, could disproportionately limit competition and potentially favor existing partners.

Technical capability requirement (past contract value of 40,000 EUR) is high relative to tender value.
Requirement for personnel to be registered in Elektrilevi's specific partner portal may restrict competition.
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and clear financing terms are practical. However, the contract start date being the same as the submission deadline is highly impractical, leaving no time for evaluation, negotiation, or formal contract signing.

Contract start date is the same as the submission deadline, which is highly impractical.
Data Consistency60/100

Several inconsistencies are present, including the conflicting evaluation criteria and the contradictory 'Estimated Value: 20,000.00 EUR' alongside 'Value Classified: Yes'. The contract start date being identical to the submission date also indicates a logical inconsistency in the timeline.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Contradiction between 'Estimated Value' and 'Value Classified'.
Sustainability50/100

Despite being flagged as 'EU Funded', the tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus in its requirements or evaluation criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to promote sustainability.

Lack of explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear project description and detailed payment terms.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Performance conditions include links to H&S and ethics.
EU Funded characteristic.

Concerns

Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
High past contract value requirement (40,000 EUR for a 20,000 EUR tender).
Requirement for personnel to be registered in Elektrilevi's specific partner portal.
Contract start date is the same as the submission deadline.
Critical tender documents not analyzed due to file format.

Recommendations

1. Ensure consistency in evaluation criteria to avoid ambiguity.
2. Review and adjust qualification requirements to promote broader competition.
3. Establish a realistic timeframe between tender opening and contract start.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline