Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Houghton Depot

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
February 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
012099-2026
Value
£12,000,000
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Published
April 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

February 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

February 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 21, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£12,000,000
Duration
14 months
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Construction of a new Council depot at Cygnet Way, Houghton-le-Spring. Proposed development to comprise of office, welfare and workshop areas, fleet vehicle garages, a gritter vehicle shed and salt barn (8000 tonne capacity) building, external hardstanding areas for additional fleet parking, skip storage and ancillary facilities (including a truck wash bay, refuelling area, EV charging and containerised storage). Staff parking for 50 vehicles.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

1 requirements across 1 categories

Mandatory (1)
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Companies must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by UK public procurement regulations (e.g., bankruptcy, grave professional misconduct, unpaid taxes, criminal convictions related to business activities).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
012099-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured data about Sunderland City Council's tender for the construction of a new depot at Cygnet Way, Houghton-le-Spring, encompassing various facilities like offices, workshops, vehicle garages, and a large salt barn.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
012099-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured data about Sunderland City Council's planned construction of a new depot in Houghton-le-Spring, detailing the scope including offices, workshops, vehicle facilities, and external areas, and indicates market engagement is underway.

Official PDF VersionPDF
012099-2026_official.pdf

This document is a preliminary market engagement notice from Sunderland City Council for the construction of a new £10-12 million depot in Houghton-le-Spring, inviting interested construction companies to register their interest, provide feedback, and assess market capacity before the formal tender in June 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This is a well-described preliminary market engagement notice for a significant construction project, demonstrating good transparency and data consistency, though lacking full tender details as expected at this planning stage.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in a 'planning' status, functioning as a preliminary market engagement. While the CPV code is correctly assigned and mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned, the procedure type is undefined, which would be a significant legal gap for a formal tender. The submission deadline for this PME is reasonable.

Undefined procedure type and code.
Clarity80/100

The project description is exceptionally clear and detailed, outlining all major components of the proposed depot. However, as a preliminary notice, specific technical requirements, evaluation criteria, and performance conditions are not yet defined, which is expected at this stage.

No specific evaluation criteria provided.
Limited detailed requirements beyond mandatory exclusion grounds.
Completeness70/100

Basic information, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are all clearly specified. Location details are also provided. However, the tender lacks comprehensive technical requirements and evaluation criteria, which are crucial for a full tender but understandable for a planning-stage document.

Missing comprehensive technical requirements.
Absence of detailed evaluation criteria.
Fairness85/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and documents are accessible, promoting transparency. There is no indication of requirements being tailored to a specific company. The deadline for market engagement feedback is reasonable. The lack of e-submission is a minor concern for equal access.

No e-submission capability mentioned.
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for planning. However, the absence of e-submission is a practical drawback for potential bidders. Document URLs are not explicitly provided in the summary.

No e-submission capability mentioned.
Document URLs not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, description, value, and dates are consistently populated and logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor fields like 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' are empty, but this does not impact the overall consistency of the available data.

Empty fields for 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person'.
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information. While this is a preliminary notice, the absence of these considerations suggests they are not yet prioritized or communicated.

No explicit mention of green procurement criteria.
No explicit mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear and detailed project description.
Transparency regarding estimated value and document access.
Good data consistency for available information.
Early market engagement, allowing for feedback before formal tender.
Correct CPV code assignment.

Concerns

Undefined procurement procedure type and code.
Absence of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria (expected for PME, but a future gap).
No e-submission capability mentioned.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Missing 'Liable Person' information.

Recommendations

1. Clearly define the procurement procedure type and liable person in the formal tender documents.
2. Implement e-submission for the formal tender to enhance accessibility and efficiency.
3. Develop and clearly state detailed technical requirements, evaluation criteria, and performance conditions for the formal tender, including sustainability and social aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline