Skip to main content
Tenders

COV - Hire of Plant with Operator (2026)

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026989-2026
Value
£10,800,000
Location
West Midlands, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£10,800,000
Duration
48 months
Location
West Midlands
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Hire of plant with operator, used predominately for Highways related works.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for plant hire with operator is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting its overall clarity and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and provides a clear CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the submission period. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could be a legal compliance issue if not addressed in the full documentation.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear and concise. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach. However, the absence of document content and specific evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The contract start date is specified. However, the lack of accessible document content and the absence of a reveal date for the full tender documents detract from completeness.

No document content available
Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria listed (though not detailed) appear objective. The main concern for fairness is the lack of accessible full documentation and the potential for undisclosed evaluation criteria, which could disadvantage bidders.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of e-submission and the unavailability of document content significantly hinder practical engagement for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for submission deadline and contract start are consistent with the contract duration.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided
Open procedure type

Concerns

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documents with clear evaluation criteria.
2. Implement an e-submission process for improved practicality.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and social value elements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline