Tenders

RMH - BEMS Consultancy

Open
Deadline
117 days left
June 28, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
001736-2026
Value
£252,000
Location
Inner London - West, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

June 21, 2026

Submission Deadline

June 28, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 28, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£252,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Inner London - West
Type
Other
68
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Provision of Building Energy Management System (BEMS) consultancy services, including strategy development, technical review, standards development, tender support and project oversight across the Trust’s estate

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-06-28 23:00:00.
--Bids must include a comprehensive quality proposal addressing the scope of services, which will be evaluated for 60% of the total score.
--Bids must include a detailed price proposal, which will be evaluated for 40% of the total score.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by relevant public procurement regulations (e.g., serious criminal offences, corruption, fraud, tax evasion, breach of environmental, social, or labour law).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally constituted and registered to operate in the relevant jurisdiction.
--Bidders must possess the necessary professional and commercial registrations to provide BEMS consultancy services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to provide BEMS consultancy services, including strategy development.
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to provide technical review services for BEMS.
--Bidders must demonstrate the capability to develop BEMS standards.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate financial stability and capacity to deliver a 36-month contract with an estimated value of 252,000 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
001736-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice from The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust for Building Energy Management System (BEMS) consultancy services, detailing the scope, estimated value, contract dates, and evaluation criteria (60% quality, 40% price).

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

68
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides essential basic information and a clear service description but is critically incomplete due to the absence of any tender documents. This fundamental flaw makes it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a compliant and competitive offer, severely compromising the quality and fairness of the procurement process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender mentions mandatory exclusion grounds and the use of a Restricted procedure, indicating an intent to comply with public procurement regulations. However, the lack of full tender documents and detailed procedural information for the Restricted procedure makes it impossible to fully verify legal compliance of the process.

Lack of detailed procedural information for the 'Restricted' procurement procedure.
Clarity40/100

The service description and evaluation weightings (60% quality, 40% price) are clear. However, the technical capability and financial stability requirements are vague, lacking specific metrics or methods for demonstration, which could lead to inconsistent interpretations.

Vague technical capability requirements ('demonstrate the capability') without specific metrics or evidence types.
Vague financial stability requirements ('demonstrate financial stability and capacity') without specific thresholds or required documentation.
Completeness83/100

The tender is critically incomplete. The complete absence of any tender documents (e.g., detailed specifications, terms and conditions, instructions to bidders, forms) means bidders cannot fully understand the scope, requirements, or submission process. This is a fundamental flaw.

No tender documents attached or available, making it impossible for bidders to prepare a comprehensive bid.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria for the 60% quality proposal.
Fairness60/100

The lack of detailed tender documents and specific evaluation criteria creates an uneven playing field and risks subjective assessment. While no explicit tailoring is evident, the vagueness of requirements could allow for arbitrary interpretation, potentially disadvantaging some bidders.

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for the 60% quality proposal could lead to subjective assessment.
The absence of tender documents creates an unfair disadvantage for all potential bidders, hindering their ability to compete equally.
Practicality40/100

The tender is highly impractical for bidders. Without any tender documents, potential suppliers cannot understand the full scope, terms, conditions, or submission requirements, rendering it impossible to prepare a meaningful and compliant bid.

Bidders cannot practically prepare a comprehensive and compliant bid without access to tender documents.
Data Consistency100/100

The provided information is generally consistent within the extract. However, the 'Innovation Focus' characteristic is not supported by any specific requirements or evaluation criteria in the extracted content.

The 'Innovation Focus' characteristic is not reflected in the extracted requirements or evaluation criteria, indicating a potential inconsistency or missed opportunity.
Sustainability25/100

No specific green procurement or social criteria are mentioned in the extracted requirements. This represents a missed opportunity for the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust to leverage its procurement for broader sustainability goals.

Absence of specific green procurement criteria.
Absence of specific social criteria.

Strengths

Clear service description and scope of work.
Transparent evaluation weighting (60% quality, 40% price).
Mandatory exclusion grounds are specified, promoting ethical bidding.
Estimated contract value and duration are provided, aiding bidder planning.

Concerns

Critical absence of any tender documents, making bid preparation impossible.
Missing detailed evaluation criteria for the 60% quality proposal, risking subjective assessment.
Vague technical capability and financial stability requirements, lacking specific metrics.
Incomplete procedural information regarding the stages of the 'Restricted' procurement.
Lack of specific green or social sustainability criteria, despite being a public trust.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents, including detailed specifications, terms and conditions, and all necessary submission forms.
2. Clearly define specific, measurable, and objective evaluation criteria for the 60% quality proposal, potentially incorporating the 'Innovation Focus'.
3. Provide clear guidance on how bidders should demonstrate technical capability and financial stability, including specific thresholds or required evidence.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline