Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

SWAST-5032-E DSEAR assessments

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027853-2026
Value
£100,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
April 08, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£100,000
Duration
36 months
Location
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

SWAST-5032-E DSEAR assessments for various buildings

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
027853-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
027853-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
027853-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for DSEAR assessments is generally well-structured with clear basic information, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting its practicality and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for below-threshold open competitions. The CPV code is provided, and there are no reported disputes. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some standards.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is concise. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of accessible document content with summaries significantly hinder clarity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of accessible document content and the absence of explicit financing information reduce its completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and capability are mentioned, suggesting an objective approach. The lack of specific evaluation criteria, however, could be a minor concern.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a specified contract start date. However, the lack of e-submission and the unavailability of document content with summaries reduce its practicality for bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code and NUTS code included
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
No accessible document content or summaries
Potential for a short submission deadline
Lack of e-submission functionality
Limited focus on sustainability

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Make tender documents fully accessible with content summaries.
3. Consider implementing e-submission for improved practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline