Skip to main content
Tenders

Rental of passenger bus with driver

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7130052
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 12, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€650,589
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
722 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Rental of passenger bus with driver
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--*
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--*
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--*

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Įsigijimo sąlygosDOC
isigijimo salygos autobuso nuoma.docx

This document contains the procurement conditions for a low-value tender for the rental of a bus with a driver, issued by the Major Juozas Lukša Training Centre of the Lithuanian Land Force.

Pasiūlymo pateikimo formaDOC
Pasiūlymo pateikimo forma.docx

This document is a proposal form for renting a passenger bus with a driver, confirming agreement with all tender conditions and providing details of the offer.

SutartisDOC
Supaprastinta+sutartis keleiviu pervezimo pas...

This document contains the draft contract and its appendices, including requirements for passenger transport services, a service handover-acceptance act, and a confidentiality pledge, for the rental of a bus with a driver.

NoticePDF
Notice_7130052.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the rental of a passenger bus with a driver by the Lithuanian Army Ground Forces Juozas Lukša Training Centre.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7130052_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a simplified open tender for bus rental with a driver, requiring the submission of a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for bus rental with a driver is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a straightforward process. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. The deadlines appear reasonable for an open tender, and no disputes are noted. The use of e-procurement aligns with regulatory requirements.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the attached documents provide necessary details regarding terms, conditions, and contract drafts. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which could be a minor point of confusion.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The submission deadline is provided.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and e-procurement is utilized, promoting fairness. All documents are accessible, and the process appears objective. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'No e-submission' check in the provided statistics contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating ambiguity. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no noted suspensions or disputes. The 'Missing reveal date' issue is minor and does not impact overall consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded' but does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria, limiting its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and service description
Comprehensive set of required documents (terms, contract draft, forms)
Use of e-procurement
Active status and clear reference number

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Ambiguity regarding e-submission vs. E-Procurement characteristic
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted proposals.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure consistency with the E-Procurement characteristic.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline