Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Microscope (ILK) (11910)

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 29, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6982471
Value
€8,500
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
April 08, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 22, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 29, 2026

Tender Opening

April 29, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€8,500
Duration
6 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€136,921
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
1,192 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Microscope (ILK) 1 pc. (details in the procurement conditions)
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for a single microscope presents a moderate competition opportunity. The key to winning lies in a highly compliant, technically superior bid that leverages the 'Green Procurement' aspect and clearly articulates value beyond the basic requirement. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a proactive approach to demonstrating best value is crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Superior Technical Performance & Sustainability: Offering a microscope that not only meets but exceeds technical requirements while demonstrating a clear commitment to energy efficiency and reduced environmental impact.

Best Value Proposition: Presenting a compelling case for overall value, considering not just the initial purchase price but also long-term operational costs, reliability, and support.

Unwavering Compliance and Reliability: Ensuring a flawless bid submission that demonstrates a thorough understanding of all requirements and a commitment to delivering a high-quality product and service.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging 'Green Procurement' as a differentiator.
Proactive definition of 'best value' due to unspecified evaluation criteria.
Potential for higher scores by exceeding minimum technical specifications.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid scoring.

Assume a balanced approach where price, technical merit, and green aspects are all important. Focus on providing a comprehensive and well-justified proposal that clearly articulates benefits across all potential evaluation dimensions. Highlight the 'Green Procurement' aspect prominently.

Limited information on specific technical requirements (awaiting 'Pirkimo sąlygos' documents).

Thoroughly review all provided tender documents (SPS 2, SPS 3, BPS) as soon as they are available. If ambiguity remains, consider submitting a clarification request to the contracting authority well in advance of the deadline.

Potential for a highly competitive market for a single unit of specialized equipment.

Focus on unique selling propositions beyond price, such as superior warranty, exceptional customer support, advanced features, and demonstrable energy efficiency.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized supplier of laboratory equipment, specifically microscopes, with a proven track record of supplying to public institutions in Lithuania or the EU. The ideal bidder will have a strong understanding of 'Green Procurement' principles and can offer a technically advanced, energy-efficient microscope model. They should also possess robust after-sales support capabilities.
Key Requirements
Compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements (as detailed in SPS 3 EBVPD.zip and implied by standard procurement practices).
Provision of a single microscope (1 vnt.) as per the description.
Adherence to 'Green Procurement' principles.
Technical specifications of the microscope must meet or exceed implied industry standards for a research/clinical setting (given the contracting authority).
Submission of all required documentation by the deadline of 2026-04-29 10:00:00.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable energy efficiency and environmental certifications of the proposed microscope model.
Comprehensive warranty and after-sales support package, including local service availability.
A clear and compelling narrative on how the proposed microscope offers the best long-term value and contributes to the contracting authority's sustainability goals.
A technically superior microscope that offers advanced features relevant to a leading university hospital's needs.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'SOCIAL ASPECTS: No' is stated, a bidder could proactively propose a commitment to local training or knowledge transfer related to the microscope's operation and maintenance, framing it as a value-add that enhances the long-term utility of the investment for Santaros klinikos.
Bid Focus Areas
Price

Offer a competitive price, but do not let it be the sole focus. Ensure it is justified by the quality and features offered. Consider total cost of ownership in pricing strategy.

Technical Compliance & Superiority

Thoroughly analyze the 'Pirkimo sąlygos' documents to ensure 100% compliance. Highlight any technical features that exceed minimum requirements and provide clear benefits to the end-user. Use evidence-based justifications for technical claims.

Green Procurement

Prominently feature the energy efficiency ratings, eco-labels, and any other sustainability credentials of the proposed microscope. Quantify the environmental benefits (e.g., reduced energy consumption over its lifespan).

Overall Value Proposition

Articulate a holistic value proposition that combines competitive pricing, superior technical performance, long-term operational efficiency (linked to green procurement), and excellent support services.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Review All Tender Documents
CriticalHigh effort

Immediately download and meticulously review all provided tender documents (SPS 2, SPS 3, BPS) to fully understand all explicit and implicit requirements, including any technical specifications, contract clauses, and submission formats.

Ensures full compliance and avoids disqualification.
Proactively Define Best Value
CriticalHigh effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, develop a compelling narrative that demonstrates the 'best value' proposition. This should encompass competitive pricing, superior technical performance, long-term operational cost savings (linked to green procurement), and robust support.

Maximizes scoring potential by addressing all likely evaluation factors.
Emphasize Green Procurement Credentials
HighMed effort

Highlight the energy efficiency, environmental certifications, and any other sustainability features of the proposed microscope. Quantify the benefits where possible (e.g., estimated energy savings).

Addresses a stated tender requirement and differentiates from less eco-conscious competitors.
Clarify Technical Specifications if Necessary
HighMed effort

If the 'Pirkimo sąlygos' documents are unclear regarding specific technical requirements, submit a formal clarification request to the contracting authority well in advance of the submission deadline.

Ensures the proposed solution precisely meets the buyer's needs and avoids technical non-compliance.
Ensure Flawless Submission
CriticalHigh effort

Pay meticulous attention to all submission requirements, including format, deadlines, and required documentation. Conduct thorough internal reviews to catch any errors or omissions.

Prevents disqualification due to administrative errors.
Consider Value-Added Service Offerings
MediumLow effort

Even though social aspects are not explicitly required, consider offering a value-added service such as basic user training or a maintenance overview session to enhance the overall offering and demonstrate commitment.

Enhances the perceived value of the bid and can create goodwill.
Benchmark Competitor Offerings
HighMed effort

Research typical microscope offerings in the market that meet similar specifications and price points to understand potential competitor strengths and weaknesses. This helps in positioning the bid effectively.

Informs pricing and feature strategy to be competitive.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most technically advanced and sustainable solution that offers the best long-term value for money, rather than solely focusing on the lowest initial price. Highlight the expertise and reliability of the supplier.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in this category]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in this category]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in this category]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in this category]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in this category]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

(BPS) Pirkimo sąlygos.docxDOC
(BPS) Pirkimo sąlygos.docx -- 90.7 KB

No content extracted

(BPS) priedai 1_2.docxDOC
(BPS) priedai 1_2.docx -- 22.2 KB

No content extracted

SPS 2 Viešojo pirkimo sutarties projektas.docxDOC
SPS 2 Viešojo pirkimo sutarties projektas.doc... -- 157.0 KB

No content extracted

(SPS) Pirkimo sąlygos.docxDOC
(SPS) Pirkimo sąlygos.docx -- 105.0 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6982471.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of one microscope (ILK) by VšĮ Vilniaus universiteto ligoninė Santaros klinikos in Lithuania, with a deadline for submission on April 29, 2026.

SPS 1 Pasiūlymas_Techninė specifikacija.xlsxXLS
SPS 1 Pasiūlymas_Techninė specifikacija.xlsx -- 52.9 KB

No content extracted

SPS 3 EBVPD.zipZIP
SPS 3 EBVPD.zip -- 79.2 KB

This document contains the general terms and conditions for an open international tender by VŠĮ Vilniaus universiteto ligoninė Santaros klinikos for the procurement of goods, services, or works, including specific requirements and appendices.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a microscope is generally well-structured with clear basic information and available documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed technical requirements, impacting clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and provides a clear procedure. The CPV code is appropriate. There are no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure.

Clarity80/100

The title and basic description are clear, but the 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' section is notably empty. Key details such as evaluation criteria are missing, requiring bidders to infer them from attached documents.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the absence of explicit requirements in the AI-extracted section and the reliance on attached documents for crucial details reduce overall completeness.

Lack of explicit requirements in AI-extracted section
Reliance on attached documents for critical details
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. There are no immediately apparent tailored requirements for specific companies. E-procurement is indicated.

Practicality65/100

While e-procurement is mentioned, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not detailed. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration is short.

Lack of specific e-submission details
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded' but does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Appropriate CPV code provided
Open procedure with EU funding
Documents are available

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed technical requirements
Unclear e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly within the tender notice or accessible documents.
2. Provide more detailed technical specifications or a clear link to them.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and platform.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline