Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Grounds Maintenance Services

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
028223-2026
Value
£100,000
Location
North West England, United Kingdom
Published
April 08, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 30, 2026

Budget
£100,000
Duration
36 months
Location
North West England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

To provide grounds maintenance for various properties within The Dean Trust, Greater Manchester

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France, UK, Denmark, Netherlands, Norway, and Finland.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

OCDS RecordDOC
028223-2026_ocds_record.json

No summary available for this document.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
028223-2026_ocds_release.json

No summary available for this document.

Official PDF VersionPDF
028223-2026_official.pdf

No summary available for this document.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for grounds maintenance services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by specifying an open procedure, providing a CPV code, and indicating no disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is present. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements outline the necessary categories for submission. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and submission deadline. However, the critical issue of zero documents with content or summaries severely hinders completeness, as bidders cannot access the full scope of requirements.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the criteria, though not fully specified, are listed as mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements. The lack of specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is a positive. However, the absence of a document URL and the lack of explicit financing information reduce its practicality. The deadline being potentially too short also impacts practical execution.

No document URL
Deadline may be too short
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadline, and value are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical within the context of the tender's active status.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
CPV code provided
Open procedure indicated

Concerns

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential for a short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documents with detailed content.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if feasible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline