Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Dynamic purchasing system for the purchase of passenger cars for Sorø Municipality

Open
Deadline
6024 days left
October 01, 2042
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
00148198-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Denmark
Published
March 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 03, 2026

Deadline for Questions

September 24, 2042

Submission Deadline

October 01, 2042

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Denmark
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Sorø Municipality has a fleet of approx. 200 vehicles distributed among the municipality's institutions and continuously replaces approx. 10-25 vehicles annually depending on the age and condition of the cars. The municipality will pool the procurement of vehicles and conduct dynamic purchasing in the system twice a year in spring and autumn respectively. The dynamic purchasing system concerns the purchase and delivery of passenger cars to all contracting authority units and institutions.

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements provided.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a dynamic purchasing system for passenger cars is generally well-structured but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and an open procedure. However, the absence of an 'reveal date' and specified evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks if not clarified in the full documentation.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement's purpose and scope is clear, outlining the need for a dynamic purchasing system for passenger cars to replace approximately 10-25 vehicles annually. The core objective is well-communicated.

Completeness70/100

While basic information like title, organization, and CPV code are present, crucial details such as estimated value, contract duration, and specific eligibility/technical/financial requirements are missing. The AI-extracted requirements section indicates a lack of specific criteria.

Estimated value not disclosed
No specific eligibility requirements provided
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair by using an open procedure and e-procurement. However, the lack of disclosed value and unspecified evaluation criteria could potentially hinder a fully objective assessment by bidders.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a contract start date, financing information, and contract duration limits the practical assessment for potential bidders. The submission deadline is exceptionally long, which is unusual.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, although the submission deadline is exceptionally far in the future.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern public tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No mention of green procurement
No mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
Description of procurement need is clear
E-procurement is indicated

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Missing crucial contract details (duration, start date)
No sustainability considerations mentioned

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria and weighting.
2. Disclose the estimated financial value of the contract.
3. Include details on contract duration and start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline