Tenders

The City of Liverpool College - Dynamic Purchasing System - Adult Education Budget (Liverpool City Region)

Open
Deadline
2584 days left
March 30, 2033
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
009430-2023
Value
£12,500,000
Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 31, 2023

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2033

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2033

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£12,500,000
Duration
120 months
Location
Merseyside
Type
Other
70
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The City of Liverpool College intends to create a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for training delivery partners for the Liverpool City Region. This provision qualifies under the Light Touch Regime. The College has opted to establish a DPS as it is deemed the most appropriate option to meet Its requirements and will enable a clear, consistent, and compliant route to market. The DPS will be open to new entrants throughout its lifespan (10 years). This is a two-stage procurement process, the first stage will involve an assessment of suitability and capability to join the Framework. The estimated contract value is the estimated value over the 10 year period based on the current annual value. Any contract awarded as a result of this process would be for an initial 12 month period.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (6)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submission for a two-stage procurement process.
--Submission for an assessment of suitability and capability to join the Framework (Stage 1).
--Submission must be made by the deadline: 2033-03-30 11:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are explicitly detailed in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Must be a training delivery partner.
--Must be able to deliver Adult Education Budget (AEB) training.
--Must be able to deliver training within the Liverpool City Region.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Capability to deliver Adult Education Budget (AEB) training.
--Capability to operate as a training delivery partner within a DPS framework.
--Capability to deliver training within the Liverpool City Region.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial thresholds (e.g., minimum annual turnover, specific guarantees) are explicitly detailed in the provided tender information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
009430-2023_official.pdf

The City of Liverpool College is establishing a 10-year Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Adult Education Budget training delivery partners in the Liverpool City Region, involving a two-stage suitability and capability assessment to join the framework.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System for adult education, offering flexibility and market access, but critically lacks detailed documentation, specific requirements, and evaluation criteria, hindering fair and transparent participation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The use of a DPS under the Light Touch Regime is a legally compliant procurement approach for this type of service. However, the absence of explicitly detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria in the provided information is a significant legal compliance risk.

Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
Absence of detailed evaluation criteria
Clarity40/100

While the overall concept of the DPS and its purpose is clear, the specific requirements for suitability and capability are vague and lack detail. Bidders cannot understand what is truly expected without further documentation.

Vague suitability and capability requirements
Lack of detailed criteria for assessment
Completeness83/100

The tender information provided is severely incomplete. Crucial elements such as full tender documents, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed eligibility/technical/financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing.

No tender documents attached
Missing detailed eligibility and technical requirements
Fairness80/100

The DPS structure, being open to new entrants throughout its lifespan, promotes fairness and broad market access. However, the critical absence of detailed suitability, capability, and evaluation criteria creates a significant risk of subjective assessment, potentially undermining fairness.

Risk of subjective assessment due to missing detailed evaluation criteria
Practicality40/100

The DPS model is practical for the College's long-term needs. However, from a bidder's perspective, preparing a meaningful submission is impractical without access to comprehensive tender documents and clear, detailed requirements.

Impractical for bidders to prepare submissions without full documentation
Data Consistency100/100

The provided data points (e.g., 10-year duration, estimated value over 10 years) are consistent with each other and the DPS model.

Sustainability0/100

The provided information does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social criteria, or innovation, which are increasingly important aspects of modern public procurement.

Absence of sustainability criteria
Absence of social criteria

Strengths

Utilizes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for flexibility and continuous market access.
DPS is open to new entrants throughout its 10-year lifespan, promoting competition.
Clear description of the procurement approach and contract duration.
Estimated contract value is disclosed.

Concerns

Critical absence of comprehensive tender documents and detailed requirements.
Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds and financial thresholds.
Lack of explicit and detailed evaluation criteria for suitability and capability.
Risk of subjective assessment due to vague requirements.
Absence of sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all comprehensive tender documents, including detailed requirements, specific exclusion grounds, and clear evaluation criteria.
2. Provide explicit and measurable suitability and capability criteria for Stage 1 assessment.
3. Consider integrating sustainability, social, and innovation objectives into the procurement process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline