IT Professional Services Framework

This tender for IT Professional Services Framework is generally well-structured, with clear LOT definitions and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

The tender adheres to the Procurement Act 2023 and uses a competitive flexible procedure. The CPV code is appropriate. While no disputes are noted, the absence of a reveal date and specific evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern if these are mandated by the Act for this procedure type. Deadlines are provided, but their reasonableness is subjective without full documentation.

The description of services and the structure into four distinct LOTs are clear and well-defined. The scope of services within each LOT is detailed, providing good guidance to potential suppliers. The conditions for call-offs are also outlined.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and CPV code. However, the lack of accessible content for the tender documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduce its completeness score. Financial requirements are implied but not explicitly detailed.

The tender is divided into LOTs, allowing suppliers to bid on specific areas of expertise, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is competitive. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of a multi-supplier framework also suggests a competitive approach.

The tender specifies a submission deadline and contract duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of a direct URL for tender documents are significant drawbacks. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, though implied by the value.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The contract start date aligns with the submission deadline, indicating logical sequencing. No suspensions or disputes are reported.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.